Predicting shrimp disease occurrence: artificial neural networks vs. logistic regression

被引:39
|
作者
Leung, P
Tran, LT
机构
[1] Univ Hawaii Manoa, Dept Biosyst Engn, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Coll Earth & Mineral Sci, Ctr Integrated Reg Assessment, University Pk, PA 16803 USA
关键词
shrimp disease; artificial neural networks; logistic regression;
D O I
10.1016/S0044-8486(00)00300-8
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Predicting the occurrence of disease outbreaks in aquacultural farms can be of considerable value to the long-term sustainable development of the industry. Prior research on disease prediction has essentially depended upon traditional statistical models with varying degrees of prediction accuracy. Furthermore, the application of these models in sustainable aquaculture development and in controlling environmental deterioration has been very limited. In an attempt to look for a more reliable model, we developed a probabilistic neural network (PNN) to predict shrimp disease outbreaks in Vietnam using farm-level data from 480 Vietnamese shrimp farms, including 86 semi-intensive and 394 extensive farms. We also compared predictive performance of the PNN against the more traditional logistic regression approach on the same data set. Disease occurrence (a 0-1 variable) is hypothesized to be affected by a set of nearly 70 variables including site characteristics, farming systems, and farm practices. Results show that the PNN model has a better predictive power than the logistic regression model. However, the PNN model uses significantly more input (explanatory) variables than the logistic regression. The logistic regression is estimated using a stepwise procedure starting with the same input variables as in PNN model. Adapting the same input variables found in the logistic regression model to the PNN model yields results no better than the logistic regression model. More importantly, the key factors for prediction in the PNN model are difficult to interpret, suggesting besides prediction accuracy, model interpretation is an important issue for further investigation. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 49
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The usage of logistic regression and artificial neural networks for evaluation and predicting property-liability insurers' solvency in Egypt
    Elghaly, Hassan Eid
    Zhang, Diping
    DATA SCIENCE IN FINANCE AND ECONOMICS, 2021, 1 (03): : 215 - 234
  • [22] A comparison of logistic regression and artificial neural networks in predicting central lymph node metastases in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma
    Ozden, Sabri
    Er, Sadettin
    Saylam, Bari
    Yildiz, Bari Dogu
    Senol, Kazim
    Tez, Mesut
    ANNALI ITALIANI DI CHIRURGIA, 2018, 89 (03) : 193 - 198
  • [23] Predicting hospital mortality for patients in the intensive care unit: A comparison of artificial neural networks with logistic regression models
    Clermont, G
    Angus, DC
    DiRusso, SM
    Griffin, M
    Linde-Zwirble, WT
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (02) : 291 - 296
  • [24] Predicting shrimp growth: Artificial neural network versus nonlinear regression models
    Yu, R
    Leung, P
    Bienfang, P
    AQUACULTURAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 34 (01) : 26 - 32
  • [25] Note on the Reliability of Biological vs. Artificial Neural Networks
    Stoop, Ruedi
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [26] Forecasting Exchange Rates: Artificial Neural Networks Vs Regression
    Semaan, David
    Harb, Atef
    Kassem, Abdallah
    2014 THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-TECHNOLOGIES AND NETWORKS FOR DEVELOPMENT (ICEND), 2014, : 156 - 161
  • [27] Predicting Diabetes Disease Occurrence Using Logistic Regression: An Early Detection Approach
    Abdalrada A.S.
    Neamah A.F.
    Murad H.
    Iraqi Journal for Computer Science and Mathematics, 2024, 5 (01): : 160 - 167
  • [28] Estimating United States-Asia Clothing Trade: Multiple Regression vs. Artificial Neural Networks
    Chan, Eve M. H.
    Ho, Danny C. K.
    Tsang, C-W
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2021, 8 (07): : 403 - 411
  • [29] Neural networks vs logistic regression: a comparative study on a large data set
    Adeodato, PJL
    Vasconcelos, GC
    Arnaud, AL
    Santos, RAF
    Cunha, RCLV
    Monteiro, DOSMP
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PATTERN RECOGNITION, VOL 3, 2004, : 355 - 358
  • [30] Predicting wildfire vulnerability using logistic regression and artificial neural networks: a case study in Brazil's Federal District
    de Bem, Pablo Pozzobon
    de Carvalho Junior, Osmar Abilio
    Trondoli Matricardi, Eraldo Aparecido
    Guimaraes, Renato Fontes
    Trancoso Gomes, Roberto Arnaldo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2019, 28 (01) : 35 - 45