The Impact of Dynamic Two-Sided Platform Pricing on Fairness Perception in the Sharing Economy

被引:0
|
作者
Angerer, Peter [1 ]
Zimmermann, Steffen [1 ]
Pale, Gerald [1 ]
Salomon, Gina [2 ]
Provin, Daniel [1 ]
Kathan, Wolfgang [1 ]
Matzler, Kurt [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
[2] Management Ctr Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
From an economic perspective, dynamic pricing seems to be the profit maximizing pricing strategy for consumer-to-consumer (C2C) sharing platforms because it allows balancing supply and demand over time. Based on distributive justice and equity theory we investigate how two characteristics of dynamic pricing, namely 'fee changes over time' and 'fee differences across consumer groups', influence fairness perception and intention to share of consumers. Using a laboratory experiment, we find that fee differences between lenders and borrowers is the dominant source of negative fairness perception, which in turn results in a lower intention to share, especially for the consumer group that is charged with a higher fee. Consequently, C2C sharing platforms have to be aware of this negative effect from fairness perception when they implement a dynamic two-sided platform pricing strategy to maximize profits.
引用
收藏
页码:675 / 684
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pricing strategies of MOSNS platform based on the theory of two-sided markets
    Li Zhonghua
    Zhang Wei
    PROCEEDINGS OF 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT COMPUTATION TECHNOLOGY AND AUTOMATION (ICICTA 2015), 2015, : 659 - 662
  • [22] Pricing Strategies of Monopoly Platform for Technology Transition in a Two-Sided Market
    Kim, Dohoon
    PICMET '12: PROCEEDINGS - TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT FOR EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2012, : 165 - 172
  • [23] Pricing Infrastructure-as-a-Service for online two-sided platform providers
    Chakraborty S.
    Basu S.
    Sharma M.
    Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 2014, 13 (3) : 199 - 223
  • [24] Profit or welfare? Pricing decisions of a two-sided socially responsible platform
    Cai X.
    Xiao Y.
    Zhang J.
    Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2024, 44 (06): : 2003 - 2017
  • [25] Worry not rareness but disparity: Impact of fairness concerns on platforms' pricing and matching decision in competitive two-sided markets
    Gui, Yunmiao
    Tan, Dingbo
    Liu, Zhi
    Dong, Feng
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 238
  • [26] Dynamic risk-sharing with two-sided moral hazard
    Zhao, Rui R.
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2007, 136 (01) : 601 - 640
  • [27] Pricing and commitment by two-sided platforms
    Hagiu, Andrei
    RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2006, 37 (03): : 720 - 737
  • [28] Exclusionary pricing in two-sided markets
    Amelio, Andrea
    Giardino-Karlinger, Liliane
    Valletti, Tommaso
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2020, 73
  • [29] An Analysis of Two-Sided Internet Pricing
    Li, Sicong
    Ma, Richard T. B.
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (ICCS), 2014, : 167 - 171
  • [30] A Dynamic Contest Model of Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets
    Grossmann, Martin
    Lang, Markus
    Dietl, Helmut M.
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ELECTRONIC COMMERCE RESEARCH, 2021, 16 (06): : 2091 - 2109