Practical applications of ecosystem services in spatial planning: Lessons learned from a systematic literature review

被引:66
|
作者
Longato, Davide [1 ]
Cortinovis, Chiara [2 ]
Albert, Christian [3 ]
Geneletti, Davide [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Trento, Dept Civil Environm & Mech Engn, Via Mesiano 77, I-38123 Trento, Italy
[2] Lund Univ, Ctr Environm & Climate Sci, Ecology Bldg,Solvegatan 37, S-22362 Lund, Sweden
[3] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Inst Geog, Univ Str 150, D-44801 Bochum, Germany
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”; 瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Ecosystem service integration; Land use planning; Planning process; Planning instrument; Science-policy interface; STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ACTIONABLE KNOWLEDGE; REGIONAL PLANNERS; VALUATION; ADAPTATION; CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT; LANDSCAPE;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2021.02.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The integration of ecosystem service (ES) knowledge into decision-making processes is increasingly endorsed by various policies and initiatives, with spatial planning targeted as one of the most relevant fields. Learning and feeding back from existing experiences is therefore a fundamental step to ensure appropriate and useful support by ES science. This paper aims to gather and critically analyse how ES science contributes to spatial planning practices. Through a systematic review of the literature about ES use in spatial planning, we map the level of integration of ES knowledge, the scale of case studies, and the type of planning addressed; and we identify and analyse case studies of real-world applications. Studies explicitly aimed at supporting spatial planning have increased over the last decade, but are still scarce. The real-world case studies reveal advantages of integrating ES knowledge into spatial planning processes, mainly concerning practical aspects such as synthesizing complex socio-environmental information and promoting participation. Windows of opportunity offered by regulatory frameworks and innovative processes and instruments, such as marine spatial plans and strategic environmental assessments, are key factors triggering the integration. However, supportive contextual conditions are necessary, including science-policy collaborations across the entire planning process and environmental awareness among policy-makers and stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 84
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Exploring the Connections between Agroecological Practices and Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Literature Review
    Palomo-Campesino, Sara
    Gonzalez, Jose A.
    Garcia-Llorente, Marina
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (12)
  • [42] Institutional Design and Performance of Markets for Watershed Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Literature Review
    Wang, Hao
    Meijerink, Sander
    van der Krabben, Erwin
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (16)
  • [43] What is the economic value of coastal and marine ecosystem services? A systematic literature review
    Lopez-Rivas, Jose D.
    Cardenas, Juan-Camilo
    MARINE POLICY, 2024, 161
  • [44] PLANNING FOR TRANSITIONING SERVICES WHEN ELIMINATION THRESHOLDS ARE MET: LESSONS LEARNED FROM TRACHOMA TRANSITION PLANNING
    Kelly, Michaela
    Courtright, Paul
    Mwatha, Stephen
    Bokea, Helen
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2018, 99 (04): : 437 - 437
  • [45] Integrating Ecology and Economics in the Study of Ecosystem Services: Some Lessons Learned
    Polasky, Stephen
    Segerson, Kathleen
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2009, 1 : 409 - 434
  • [46] SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE-REVIEW FOR FEDERAL-GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT - APPROACH AND LESSONS LEARNED
    ODAY, DM
    STEINBERG, EP
    DICKERSIN, K
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1993, 34 (04) : 940 - 940
  • [47] Lessons learned from 40 novel PIGA patients and a review of the literature
    Bayat, Allan
    Knaus, Alexej
    Pendziwiat, Manuela
    Afenjar, Alexandra
    Barakat, Tahsin Stefan
    Bosch, Friedrich
    Callewaert, Bert
    Calvas, Patrick
    Ceulemans, Berten
    Chassaing, Nicolas
    Depienne, Christel
    Endziniene, Milda
    Ferreira, Carlos R.
    Moura de Souza, Carolina Fischinger
    Freihuber, Cecile
    Ganesan, Shiva
    Gataullina, Svetlana
    Guerrini, Renzo
    Guerrot, Anne-Marie
    Hansen, Lars
    Jezela-Stanek, Aleksandra
    Karsenty, Caroline
    Kievit, Anneke
    Kooy, Frank R.
    Korff, Christian M.
    Hansen, Johanne Kragh
    Larsen, Martin
    Layet, Valerie
    Lesca, Gaetan
    McBride, Kim L.
    Meuwissen, Marije
    Mignot, Cyril
    Montomoli, Martino
    Moore, Hannah
    Naudion, Sophie
    Nava, Caroline
    Nougues, Marie-Christine
    Parrini, Elena
    Pastore, Matthew
    Schelhaas, Jurgen H.
    Skinner, Steven
    Szczaluba, Krzysztol
    Thomas, Ashley
    Thomassen, Mads
    Tranebjaerg, Lisbeth
    van Slegtenhorst, Marjon
    Wolfe, Lynne A.
    Lal, Dennis
    Gardella, Elena
    Ousager, Lilian Bomme
    EPILEPSIA, 2020, 61 (06) : 1142 - 1155
  • [48] Letter: Telemedicine in Neurosurgery: Lessons Learned From a Systematic Review of the Literature for the COVID-19 Era and Beyond
    Kitov, Borislav D.
    Davarski, Atanas N.
    Kitova, Tanya T.
    Kilova, Kristina P.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 89 (03) : E191 - E192
  • [49] In Reply: Telemedicine in Neurosurgery: Lessons Learned From a Systematic Review of the Literature for the COVID-19 Era and Beyond
    Eichberg, Daniel G.
    Basil, Gregory W.
    Di, Long
    Shah, Ashish H.
    Luther, Evan M.
    Lu, Victor M.
    Perez-Dickens, Maggy
    Komotar, Ricardo J.
    Levi, Allan D.
    Ivan, Michael E.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 89 (03) : E193 - E193
  • [50] In Reply: Telemedicine in Neurosurgery: Lessons Learned From a Systematic Review of the Literature for the COVID-19 Era and Beyond
    Kosgi, Srinivas
    Rahman, Moshiur
    Agrawal, Amit
    Rafael Moscote-Salazar, Luis
    NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 87 (06) : E700 - E700