MANAGING FOR STAKEHOLDERS, STAKEHOLDER UTILITY FUNCTIONS, AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE

被引:643
|
作者
Harrison, Jeffrey S. [1 ]
Bosse, Douglas A. [1 ]
Phillips, Robert A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Richmond, Robins Sch Business, Richmond, VA 23173 USA
关键词
stakeholder management; competitive advantage; firm performance; organizational justice; reciprocity; network theory; CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; NETWORK; RECIPROCITY; TIES; RESPONSIBILITY; CAPABILITIES; PERSPECTIVE; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1002/smj.801
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A firm that manages for stakeholders allocates more resources to satisfy the needs and demands of its legitimate stakeholders than would be necessary to simply retain their willful participation in the firm's productive activities. We explain why this sort of behavior unlocks additional potential for value creation, as well as the conditions that either facilitate or disrupt the value-creation process. Firms that managed for stakeholders develop trusting relationships with them based on principles of distributional, procedural, and interactional justice. Under these conditions, stakeholders are more likely to share nuanced information regarding their utility functions, thereby increasing the ability of the firm to allocate its resources to areas that will best satisfy them (thus increasing demand for business transactions with the firm). In addition, this information can spur innovation, as well as allow the firm to deal better with changes in the environment. Competitive advantages stemming from a managing-for-stakeholders approach are argued to be sustainable because they are associated with path dependence and causal ambiguity. These explanations provide a strong rationale for including stakeholder theory in the discussion of firm competitiveness and performance. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 74
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Building competitive advantage with sustainable products e A case study perspective of stakeholders
    Kahupi, Inamutila
    Hull, Clyde Eirikur
    Okorie, Okechukwu
    Millette, Sherwyn
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 289
  • [33] FIRM FUNCTIONS AND THE NATURE OF COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN INTERNATIONALIZING SMEs
    Haapanen, Lauri
    Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, Pia
    Hermes, Jan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2018, 22 (03)
  • [34] Stakeholder dynamics of contextual ambidextrous capabilities and authenticity: A conceptual synchronisation for competitive advantage
    Shams, S. M. Riad
    Vrontis, Demetris
    Thrassou, Alkis
    Themistocleous, Christos
    Christofi, Michael
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 46 (01) : 26 - 35
  • [35] Dynamic capabilities, strategic stakeholder alliances and sustainable competitive advantage: evidence from
    Cui, Yu
    Jiao, Hao
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2011, 11 (04): : 386 - +
  • [36] Demystifying the Role of Stakeholder Pressure and Competitive Advantage on Environmental Performance of Garments Industries in
    Chowdhury, Mohammed Ali Arshad
    Dey, Mouri
    Rahman, Mohammad Morshedur
    Ali, Mostafa
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ACCOUNTING AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 11 (02) : 115 - 138
  • [37] HOW APPLYING INSTRUMENTAL STAKEHOLDER THEORY CAN PROVIDE SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
    Jones, Thomas M.
    Harrison, Jeffrey S.
    Felps, Will
    ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2018, 43 (03): : 371 - 391
  • [38] Reducing transportation emissions A reaction to stakeholder pressure or a strategy to increase competitive advantage
    Palsson, Henrik
    Kovacs, Gyongyi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION & LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2014, 44 (04) : 283 - 304
  • [39] COMPETITIVE PRODUCTION FOR CONSTANT RISK UTILITY FUNCTIONS
    MCCALL, JJ
    REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1967, 34 (04): : 417 - 420
  • [40] Review of Effective Practices for Managing Utility Coordination Stakeholders in Highway Projects
    Victorio, Shani A. Montes
    Sturgill, Roy E., Jr.
    CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH CONGRESS 2024: CONTRACTING, DELIVERY, SCHEDULING, ESTIMATING, ECONOMICS, AND ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT AND PLANNING IN CONSTRUCTION, 2024, : 580 - 590