Description, prescription and the choice of discount rates
被引:32
|
作者:
Baum, Seth D.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Penn State Univ, Dept Geog, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
Penn State Univ, Rock Eth Inst, University Pk, PA 16802 USAPenn State Univ, Dept Geog, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
Baum, Seth D.
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Geog, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Rock Eth Inst, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
Discounting;
Cost-benefit analysis;
Ethics;
Social choice;
Democracy;
Climate change;
CLIMATE-CHANGE;
SOCIAL RATE;
ECONOMICS;
FUTURE;
UTILITY;
STERN;
D O I:
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.08.024
中图分类号:
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号:
071012 ;
0713 ;
摘要:
The choice of discount rates is a key issue in the analysis of long-term societal issues, in particular environmental issues such as climate change. Approaches to choosing discount rates are generally placed into two categories: the descriptive approach and the prescriptive approach. The descriptive approach is often justified on grounds that it uses a description of how society discounts instead of having analysts impose their own discounting views on society. This paper analyzes the common forms of the descriptive and prescriptive approaches and finds that, in contrast with customary thinking. both forms are equally descriptive and prescriptive. The prescriptions concern who has standing (i.e. who is included) in society. how the views of these individuals are measured, and how the measurements are aggregated. Such prescriptions are necessary to choose from among the many possible descriptions of how society discounts. The descriptions are the measurements made given a choice of measurement technique. Thus, the labels "descriptive approach" and "prescriptive approach" are deeply misleading, as analysts cannot avoid imposing their own views on society. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.