The impact of product presentation on decision-making and purchasing

被引:31
|
作者
Boardman, Rosy [1 ]
McCormick, Helen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Manchester, Lancs, England
来源
QUALITATIVE MARKET RESEARCH | 2019年 / 22卷 / 03期
关键词
Age; Website design; Eye-tracking; Product image; Product presentation; Product viewing; QUALITY; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1108/QMR-09-2017-0124
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose This paper aims to investigate how apparel product presentation influences consumer decision-making and whether there are any differences between age groups. Design/methodology/approach A mixed methodology was used including eye-tracking and qualitative in-depth interviews, with a purposive sample of 50 participants between age 20 and 70. Findings A higher number of product presentation features resulted in increased positive visual, cognitive and affective responses as consumers wanted as much visual information as possible to aid decision-making. Images of models attracted the most attention and were the most influential product presentation feature, followed by mannequin images and the zoom function. The 20 s spent much less time viewing and interacting with the product presentation features than middle age groups (30 s-50 s), had minimal fixations on mannequin images and had a much quicker decision-making process than other age groups. Practical implications - The research informs retailers which product presentation features are the most effective for their target market to aid consumer decision-making with the aim of reducing returns. Originality/value The paper contributes to the literature by providing more in-depth insights than previous studies into the impact of online product presentation on consumer decision-making by using qualitative research and eye-tracking. The research also explores more product presentation features than previous research and investigates the presentation of apparel products, which are notoriously the most difficult products for consumers to assess online. The research is unique in its exploration of age differences in relation to product presentation features.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 380
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Linking Purchasing to Ethical Decision-Making: An Empirical Investigation
    Husser, Jocelyn
    Gautier, Laurence
    Andre, Jean-Marc
    Lespinet-Najib, Veronique
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2014, 123 (02) : 327 - 338
  • [12] RESEARCH OF CONSUMER TRENDS IN THE PURCHASING DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
    Nanic, Arnela
    Tevsic, Dijana
    5TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ECONOMY OF INTEGRATION (ICEI 2017): THE ROLE OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT IN MODERN ENVIRONMENT, 2017, : 299 - 313
  • [13] INTRAORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT IN THE HOSPITAL PURCHASING DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
    COCHRAN, DS
    WHITE, DD
    ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1981, 24 (02): : 324 - 332
  • [14] DECISION-MAKING UNDER RISK - APPLICATIONS TO INSURANCE PURCHASING
    SHANTEAU, J
    ADVANCES IN CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1992, 19 : 177 - 181
  • [15] The Impact of Environmental Indicators on Consumer Decision-Making in the Purchasing of Lifestyle Essentials: A Quantitative Analysis
    Paliwoda, Beata
    Matuszak-Flejszman, Alina
    Ankiel, Magdalena
    Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek, Malgorzata
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (04)
  • [16] PARTOGRAM PRESENTATION AND OBSTETRIC DECISION-MAKING
    SHARMA, JB
    SHAXTED, EJ
    KHASTGIR, G
    LANCET, 1992, 340 (8813): : 240 - 240
  • [17] Impact of Muslim decision-making style and religiosity on intention to purchasing certified halal food
    Usman, Hardius
    Chairy, Chairy
    Projo, Nucke Widowati Kusumo
    JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC MARKETING, 2022, 13 (11) : 2268 - 2289
  • [18] The impact of information presentation on self-other risk decision-making
    Zhou, Ai-Bao
    Li, Ze-Kai
    Xie, Pei
    Lei, Yun-Fei
    Cui, Bai-Xia
    Yao, Le
    Huang, Chao-Zheng
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [20] THE IMPACT OF INFLUENCERS ON THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS REGARDING THE PURCHASE OF THE BRAND PRODUCT
    Gajanova, Lubica
    Majerova, Jana
    Nadanyiova, Margareta
    BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATION, 2020, 18 (02) : 282 - 293