Energy metabolism of pregnant zebu and crossbred zebu dairy cattle

被引:1
|
作者
Lage, Helena Ferreira [1 ]
da Costa Cruz Borges, Ana Luiza [1 ]
e Silva, Ricardo Reis [1 ]
Borges, Alan Maia [1 ]
Mendes Ruas, Jose Reinaldo [2 ]
Araujo de Carvalho, Pedro Henrique [1 ]
Fonseca, Marcelina Pereira [1 ]
Dutra Vivenza, Paolo Antonio [1 ]
Goncalves, Lucio Carlos [1 ]
de Souza, Andre Santos [1 ]
de Carvalho, Antonio Ultimo [1 ]
Facury Filho, Elias Jorge [1 ]
Silva, Edilane Aparecida [3 ]
da Gloria, Joana Ribeiro [1 ]
Ferreira, Alexandre Lima [1 ]
Meneses, Rodrigo Melo [1 ]
Simoes Saliba, Eloisa de Oliveira [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Vet Sch, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[2] Unimontes, Dept Anim Sci, Janauba, MG, Brazil
[3] Empresa Pesquisa Agr Minas Gerais, Uberaba, MG, Brazil
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 02期
关键词
NUTRIENT RESTRICTION; OXYGEN-CONSUMPTION; GRAVID UTERUS; GROWTH; MIDGESTATION; LACTATION; HOLSTEIN; HEIFERS; PROTEIN; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0246208
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to determine the energy partition of pregnant F1 Holstein x Gyr with average initial body weight (BW) of 515.6 kg and Gyr cows with average initial BW of 435.1 kg at 180, 210 and 240 days of gestation, obtained using respirometry. Twelve animals in two groups (six per genetic group) received a restricted diet equivalent to 1.3 times the net energy for maintenance (NEm). The proportion of gross energy intake (GEI) lost as feces did not differ between the evaluated breeds and corresponded to 28.65% on average. The daily methane production (L/d) was greater for (P<0.05) F1 HxG compared to Gyr animals. However, when expressed as L/kg dry matter (DM) or as percentage of GEI there were no differences between the groups (P>0.05). The daily loss of energy as urine (mean of 1.42 Mcal/d) did not differ (P>0.05) between groups and ranged from 3.87 to 5.35% of the GEI. The metabolizable energy intake (MEI) of F1 HxG animals was greater (P < 0.05) at all gestational stages compared to Gyr cows when expressed in Mcal/d. However, when expressed in kcal/kg of metabolic BW (BW0,75), the F1 HxG cows had MEI 11% greater (P<0.05) at 240 days of gestation and averaged 194.39 kcal/kg of BW0,75. Gyr cows showed no change in MEI over time (P>0.05), with a mean of 146.66 kcal/kg BW0. 75. The ME used by the conceptus was calculated by deducting the metabolizable energy for maintenance (MEm) from the MEI, which was obtained in a previous study using the same cows prior to becoming pregnant. The values of NEm obtained in the previous study with similar non-pregnant cows were 92.02 kcal/kg BW0.75 for F1 HxG, and 76.83 kcal/kg BW0.75 for Gyr (P = 0.06). The average ME for pregnancy (MEp) was 5.33 Mcal/d for F1 HxG and 4.46 Mcal/d for Gyr. The metabolizability ratio, averaging 0.60, was similar among the evaluated groups (P>0.05). The ME / Digestible Energy (DE) ratio differed between groups and periods evaluated (P<0.05) with a mean of 0.84. The heat increment (HI) accounted for 22.74% and 24.38% of the GEI for F1 HxG and Gyr cows, respectively. The proportion of GEI used in the basal metabolism by pregnant cows in this study represented 29.69%. However, there were no differences between the breeds and the evaluation periods and corresponded to 29.69%. The mean NE for pregnancy (NEp) was 2.76 Mcal/d and did not differ between groups and gestational stages (P>0.05).
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] LIVEWEIGHT PERFORMANCE OF CROSSBRED AND ZEBU CATTLE GRAZING ON NATIVE OR RHODES GRASS PASTURES
    ODONOVAN, PB
    WOLDEGEBRIEL, A
    TAYLOR, MS
    GEBREWOLDE, A
    TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 1978, 10 (04) : 243 - 249
  • [22] ECTOPARASITIC AND ENDOPARASITIC EFFECTS ON GROWTH RATES OF ZEBU CROSSBRED AND BRITISH CATTLE IN FIELD
    SEIFERT, GW
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1971, 22 (05): : 839 - &
  • [23] Leptin Gene Markers in Crossbred cattle with Angus, Zebu, Romosinuano and Blanco Orejinegro
    Fernando Ceron-Munoz, Mario
    Montoya Atehortua, Alba Eunery
    Trujillo Bravo, Esperanza del Rocio
    Ramirez Toro, Edison Julian
    Monsalve Fonnegra, Zulma Isabel
    REVISTA CIENTIFICA-FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS VETERINARIAS, 2009, 19 (04): : 371 - 381
  • [24] Bovine mastitis in zebu and crossbred cattle under the extensive management system in Tanzania
    Shem, MN
    Mosha, EA
    Machangu, R
    Karnbarage, D
    Fujihara, T
    ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2002, 15 (05): : 751 - 756
  • [25] SIMULATING LACTATION MILK-YIELD FROM INTERVAL RECORDING IN CROSSBRED (TEMPERATE X ZEBU) DAIRY-CATTLE
    KHANNA, AS
    BALAINE, DS
    TROPICAL AGRICULTURE, 1989, 66 (04): : 365 - 368
  • [26] Follicular dynamics in Zebu cattle
    Viana, JHM
    Ferreira, AD
    De Sá, WF
    Camargo, LSD
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2000, 35 (12) : 2501 - 2509
  • [27] PRACTICAL USE OF MOLECULAR MARKERS IN BEEF AND DAIRY ZEBU CATTLE IN BRAZIL
    Sterman Ferraz, Jose Bento
    Eler, Joanir Pereira
    Meirelles, Flavio Vieira
    Carvalho Balieiro, Julio Cesar
    ACTA SCIENTIAE VETERINARIAE, 2008, 36 : S305 - S310
  • [28] OESTRUS IN ZEBU CATTLE IN UGANDA
    ROLLINSON, DHL
    NATURE, 1955, 176 (4477) : 352 - 353
  • [29] LYMPHOSARCOMA IN INDIAN ZEBU CATTLE
    NAIK, SN
    DABHOLKAR, RD
    RANDELIA, HP
    ONCOLOGY, 1971, 25 (01) : 72 - +
  • [30] Signatures of positive selection in African Butana and Kenana dairy zebu cattle
    Bahbahani, Hussain
    Salim, Bashir
    Almathen, Faisal
    Al Enezi, Fahad
    Mwacharo, Joram M.
    Hanotte, Olivier
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (01):