Environmental regulations, innovation and firm performance: A revisit of the Porter hypothesis

被引:368
|
作者
Ramanathan, Ramakrishnan [1 ]
He, Qile [2 ]
Black, Andrew [3 ]
Ghobadian, Abby [4 ]
Gallear, David [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bedfordshire, Business Sch, Luton, Beds, England
[2] Coventry Univ, Coventry Business Sch, Coventry CV1 5FB, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Nottingham, Business Sch, Nottingham, England
[4] Univ Reading, Henley Business Sch, Reading, Berks, England
[5] Brunel Univ, Brunel Business Sch, Uxbridge, Middx, England
关键词
Environmental regulations; Flexibility; Innovation; Public benefits of sustainability; Private benefits of sustainability; Porter hypothesis; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; PRODUCT INNOVATION; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; IMPACT; INDUSTRY; MANAGEMENT; COMPETITIVENESS; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.116
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper examines the relationships between environmental regulations, firms' innovation and private sustainability benefits using nine case studies of UK and Chinese firms. It aims to unravel the mechanisms by which a firm's environmental behaviour in improving its private benefits of sustainability is influenced by its relationship with the government, which primarily enacts regulations to maximise public sustainability benefits in the interests of society as a whole. The paper takes its cue from the Porter hypothesis to make some broad preliminary assumptions to inform the research design. A conceptual framework was developed through inductive case studies using template analysis. The results show that depending on firms' resources and capabilities, those that adopt a more dynamic approach to respond to environmental regulations innovatively and take a proactive approach to manage their environmental performance are generally better able to reap the private benefits of sustainability. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 92
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessment of Technology vs Environmental Regulations in China Based on DEA Malmquist Model and Porter Hypothesis
    Yue, Li-ping
    Yuan, Rui
    Shi, Mei-ni
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOCIAL SCIENCE AND DEVELOPMENT (ICSSD 2017), 2017, : 88 - 91
  • [22] Porter's hypothesis on environmental policy in an oligopoly model with cost asymmetry caused by innovation
    Feess, E
    Taistra, G
    JAHRBUCHER FUR NATIONALOKONOMIE UND STATISTIK, 2000, 220 (01): : 18 - 31
  • [23] The stringency of environmental regulation and the 'Porter Hypothesis'
    Roediger-Schluga, T
    ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND THE INTERNATIOANAL ECONOMY, 2002, 25 : 123 - 147
  • [24] Industry and Regional Environmental Regulations: Policy Heterogeneity and Firm Performance
    Li, Mei
    Li, Zhubo
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2022, 31 (03): : 2665 - 2682
  • [25] Environmental Innovation and Firm Performance: How Firm Size and Motives Matter
    Andries, Petra
    Stephan, Ute
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (13)
  • [26] Regulations, politics, and firm green innovation
    Xu, Jian
    Sheng, Yan
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2023, 80 : 13 - 32
  • [27] Impact of Environmental Protection Regulations on Corporate Performance From Porter Hypothesis Perspective: A Study Based on Publicly Listed Manufacturing Firms Data
    Mu, Shaohong
    Wang, Xianglu
    Mohiuddin, Muhammad
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [28] The extension of the Porter hypothesis: Can the role of environmental regulation on economic development be affected by other dimensional regulations?
    Mi Zefeng
    Zeng Gang
    Xin Xiaorui
    Shang Yongmin
    Hai Junjiao
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 203 : 933 - 942
  • [29] A meta-analysis of environmental innovation and firm performance
    Liao, Zhongju
    Liu, Ping
    Liu, Shuchun
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 64 (11) : 2047 - 2065
  • [30] Environmental taxes, enterprise innovation, and environmental total factor productivity—effect test based on Porter’s hypothesis
    Hongjun Guan
    Yingxue Zhang
    Aiwu Zhao
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 99885 - 99899