Rule-based models for evaluating mechanisms of distributional change

被引:18
|
作者
Skelly, DK [1 ]
Meir, E [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV WASHINGTON,DEPT ZOOL,SEATTLE,WA 98195
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.95415.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Viability models assume that particular mechanisms (e.g., decreased probability of colonization in isolated habitats) drive the pattern of population invasion and extinction. Although authors often provide evidence supporting the inclusion or exclusion of a mechanism, there has been no means of rigorously comparing different factors for a given species. We present a method of evaluating alternative mechanisms of distributional change that relies on two or more surveys of species presence-absence across a large number of sites, a dataset often available (or at least attainable) for many taxa. The key idea of our approach is to use hypotheses to specify rules for dividing sites into classes. Our model estimates class-specific probabilities of invasion and extinction and then uses these rates to assign invasions and extinctions to sites in multiple stochastic simulations. The output of the model is a frequency distribution of mistakes generated by comparing predicted distributions with the actual distributions. As a first attempt to apply the approach we modeled invasions and extinctions of 14 amphibian species across 32 ponds in Michigan. We compared hypotheses that amphibian distributions changed as a result of the spatial arrangement of sites, as a result of succession, or randomly. Overall, the spatial approach provided a poor explanation of distributional changes, performing no better than the random model for all species. In contrast, the succession model, based on temporal changes in breeding sites, performed better than the null model for at least three species. These results were surprising as spatial effects are thought to be important to the dynamics of pond-breeding amphibians. Our results say little about the general importance of fragmentation and other spatial effects, but do suggest that alternative mechanisms of change can be important. Because of their ability to assess the importance of different mechanisms, rule based models could provide useful input into the design of biodiversity management strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 538
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Semantics of Visual Models in a Rule-based Setting
    Kreowski, Hans-Joerg
    Hoelscher, Karsten
    Knirsch, Peter
    ELECTRONIC NOTES IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2006, 148 (01) : 75 - 88
  • [22] Random ensemble of fuzzy rule-based models
    Hu, Xingchen
    Pedrycz, Witold
    Wang, Xianmin
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2019, 181
  • [23] Linearity testing for fuzzy rule-based models
    Luis Aznarte, Jose
    Medeiros, Marcelo C.
    Benitez, Jose M.
    FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2010, 161 (13) : 1836 - 1851
  • [24] On cognitive preferences and the plausibility of rule-based models
    Fuernkranz, Johannes
    Kliegr, Tomas
    Paulheim, Heiko
    MACHINE LEARNING, 2020, 109 (04) : 853 - 898
  • [25] Fuzzy rule-based models for case retrieval
    Sun, Z.
    Finnie, G.
    International Journal of Engineering Intelligent Systems for Electrical Engineering and Communications, 2002, 10 (04): : 215 - 226
  • [26] bnglViz: online visualization of rule-based models
    Liguori-Bills, Noah
    Blinov, Michael L.
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2024, 40 (06)
  • [27] Fuzzy rule-based models for case retrieval
    Sun, Z
    Finnie, G
    ENGINEERING INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS FOR ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMMUNICATIONS, 2002, 10 (04): : 215 - 226
  • [28] Rule-Based Classification Models of Molecular Autofluorescence
    Su, Bo-Han
    Tu, Yi-Shu
    Lin, Olivia A.
    Harn, Yeu-Chern
    Shen, Meng-Yu
    Tseng, Yufeng J.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2015, 55 (02) : 434 - 445
  • [29] EXPLANATORY PITFALLS AND RULE-BASED DRIVER MODELS
    MICHON, JA
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 1989, 21 (04): : 341 - 353
  • [30] On cognitive preferences and the plausibility of rule-based models
    Johannes Fürnkranz
    Tomáš Kliegr
    Heiko Paulheim
    Machine Learning, 2020, 109 : 853 - 898