Blastocyst transfer for all? Higher cumulative live birth chance in a blastocyst-stage transfer policy compared to a cleavage-stage transfer policy

被引:2
|
作者
Di Croo, I [1 ]
Colman, R. [2 ]
De Sutter, P. [1 ]
Tilleman, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Ghent, Reprod Med, C Heymanslaan 10, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Ghent Univ Hosp, Biostat Unit, C Heymanslaan 10, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
来源
FACTS VIEWS AND VISION IN OBGYN | 2019年 / 11卷 / 02期
关键词
Cleavage-stage transfer; blastocyst-stage transfer; cumulative live birth rate; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; EMBRYO-TRANSFER; DELIVERY RATE; FRESH; PREGNANCIES; OUTCOMES; CULTURE; IMPACT; AGE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: In an unselected patient population, what is the cumulative live birth rate per oocyte collection cycle in a blastocyst-stage transfer policy compared to a cleavage-stage transfer policy? Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of 1656 IVF and ICSI cycles was performed in two time-frames between January 2010 and December 2016. Transfer was scheduled, either on day 3 (n=729) or on day 5 (n=927). In this study, the main outcome measure was cumulative live birth rate per oocyte collection cycle including fresh and frozen embryo transfers in both groups. Results: The cumulative live birth rates per oocyte collection cycle were comparable between patients with cleavage-stage transfers (day 3 group) and those with blastocyst-stage transfers (day 5 group) (23.7% versus 25.5%, respectively; p = 0.42). After controlling for confounders, there was a 34% increased chance of live birth with blastocyst-stage transfer policy compared with cleavage-stage transfer policy (odds ratio (OR) =1.34; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.051 to 1.704; p = 0.018). Conclusion: In an unselected patient cohort, the cumulative live birth chance per oocyte collection cycle is higher in a blastocyst-stage transfer policy compared to a cleavage-stage transfer policy.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 176
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ongoing and cumulative pregnancy rate after cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer using vitrification for cryopreservation: Impact of age on the results
    S. Fernández-Shaw
    R. Cercas
    C. Braña
    C. Villas
    I. Pons
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2015, 32 : 177 - 184
  • [22] A higher male to female sex ratio is seen with blastocyst transfer compared to cleavage stage transfer
    Jun, SH
    Milki, AA
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2004, 81 : S29 - S29
  • [23] Ongoing and cumulative pregnancy rate after cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer using vitrification for cryopreservation: Impact of age on the results
    Fernandez-Shaw, S.
    Cercas, R.
    Brana, C.
    Villas, C.
    Pons, I.
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2015, 32 (02) : 177 - 184
  • [24] BIRTHWEIGHT IN INFANTS FOLLOWING BLASTOCYST TRANSFER COMPARED TO CLEAVAGE STAGE TRANSFER.
    Litzky, J. F.
    Boulet, S.
    Esfandiari, N.
    Zhang, Y.
    Kissin, D. M.
    Theiler, R. N.
    Marsit, C.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2017, 108 (03) : E37 - E37
  • [25] Incidence of monozygotic twinning with blastocyst transfer compared to cleavage stage transfer.
    Milki, AA
    Jun, SH
    Hinckley, MD
    Behr, B
    Giudice, LC
    Westphal, LM
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2002, 78 (03) : S47 - S47
  • [26] Live birth rate following a euploid blastocyst transfer is not affected by double vitrification and warming at cleavage or blastocyst stage
    Theodorou, Efstathios
    Jones, Benjamin P.
    Armas, Daniella F. Cardenas
    Heath, Carleen
    Serhal, Paul
    Ben-Nagi, Jara
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2022, 39 (04) : 987 - 993
  • [27] Live birth rate following a euploid blastocyst transfer is not affected by double vitrification and warming at cleavage or blastocyst stage
    Efstathios Theodorou
    Benjamin P. Jones
    Daniella F. Cardenas Armas
    Carleen Heath
    Paul Serhal
    Jara Ben-Nagi
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2022, 39 : 987 - 993
  • [28] Cleavage stage embryo transfer impairs cumulative live birth rates and time to livebirth as compared to blastocyst transfer in oocyte recipients. A randomized controlled trial
    Clua Obrado, E.
    Rodriguez, I.
    Arroyo, G.
    Martinez, F.
    Latre, L.
    Coroleu, B.
    Polyzos, N. P.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 35 : 2 - 3
  • [29] An informed decision between cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage transfer in IVF requires data on the transfers of frozen-thawed embryos
    Cornelisse, Simone
    Fleischer, Kathrin
    Repping, Sjoerd
    Mastenbroek, Sebastiaan
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2018, 33 (07) : 1370 - 1370
  • [30] Comparison of the Sex Ratio with Blastocyst Transfer and Cleavage Stage Transfer
    Amin A. Milki
    Sunny H. Jun
    Mary D. Hinckley
    Lynn W. Westphal
    Linda C. Giudice
    Barry Behr
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2003, 20 : 323 - 326