Comparing Methods to Assess Intraobserver Measurement Error of 3D Craniofacial Landmarks Using Geometric Morphometrics Through a Digitizer Arm

被引:17
|
作者
Menendez, Lumila Paula [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tubingen, DFG Ctr Adv Studies, Rumelinstr 23, D-72070 Tubingen, Germany
关键词
forensic science; craniofacial morphometry; intraobserver error; geometric morphometrics; repeated measures ANOVA; intraclass correlation coefficient; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; REPEATABILITY; SHAPE; PRECISION;
D O I
10.1111/1556-4029.13301
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
Intraobserver error (INTRA-OE) is the difference between repeated measurements of the same variable made by the same observer. The objective of this work was to evaluate INTRA-OE from 3D landmarks registered with a Microscribe, in different datasets: (A)the 3D coordinates, (B) linear measurements calculated from A, and (C) the six-first principal component axes. INTRA-OE was analyzed by digitizing 42 landmarks from 23 skulls in three events two weeks apart from each other. Systematic error was tested through repeated measures ANOVA (ANOVA-RM), while random error through intraclass correlation coefficient. Results showed that the largest differences between the three observations were found in the first dataset. Some anatomical points like nasion, ectoconchion, temporosphenoparietal, asterion, and temporomandibular presented the highest INTRA-OE. In the second dataset, local distances had higher INTRA-OE than global distances while the third dataset showed the lowest INTRA-OE.
引用
收藏
页码:741 / 746
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quantitative analysis of modern human and fossil mandibles using 3D geometric morphometrics.
    Nicholson, E
    Harvati, K
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2005, : 158 - 158
  • [32] Inside-out view in variational modularity of an actinopterygian using 3D geometric morphometrics
    Vanhaesebroucke, O.
    Larouche, O.
    Cloutier, R.
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 61 : E931 - E932
  • [33] Differentiating percussion pits and carnivore tooth pits using 3D reconstructions and geometric morphometrics
    Yravedra, Jose
    Aramendi, Julia
    Angel Mate-Gonzalez, Miguel
    Austin Courtenay, Lloyd
    Gonzalez-Aguilera, Diego
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (03):
  • [34] COMPARING GNG3D AND QUADRIC ERROR METRICS METHODS TO SIMPLIFY 3D MESHES
    Alvarez, Rafael
    Tortosa, Leandro
    Vicent, Jose F.
    Zamora, Antonio
    GRAPP 2009: PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER GRAPHICS THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2009, : 99 - +
  • [35] Missing the third dimension in geometric morphometrics: how to assess if 2D images really are a good proxy for 3D structures?
    Cardini, Andrea
    HYSTRIX-ITALIAN JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 2014, 25 (02): : 73 - 81
  • [36] Binocular vision measurement system for geometric error of 3D printers at high temperature
    Li, Rui
    Huang, Nuodi
    Zhang, Yang
    Zhu, Limin
    Ibaraki, Soichi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 130 (5-6): : 2675 - 2686
  • [37] Binocular vision measurement system for geometric error of 3D printers at high temperature
    Rui Li
    Nuodi Huang
    Yang Zhang
    Limin Zhu
    Soichi Ibaraki
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2024, 130 : 2771 - 2783
  • [38] Volume Visualization and Error Analysis Using 3D ARM Imaging Data
    Fahey, B. J.
    Dumont, D. M.
    Trahey, G. E.
    2006 IEEE ULTRASONICS SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1-5, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 1140 - 1143
  • [39] Error tracking in Ikonos Geometric processing using a 3D parametric model
    Toutin, T
    PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2003, 69 (01): : 43 - 51
  • [40] 3D pollination biology using micro-computed tomography and geometric morphometrics in Theobroma cacao
    Wolcott, Katherine A.
    Stanley, Edward L.
    Gutierrez, Osman A.
    Wuchty, Stefan
    Whitlock, Barbara Ann
    APPLICATIONS IN PLANT SCIENCES, 2023, 11 (05):