Comparing Methods to Assess Intraobserver Measurement Error of 3D Craniofacial Landmarks Using Geometric Morphometrics Through a Digitizer Arm

被引:17
|
作者
Menendez, Lumila Paula [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tubingen, DFG Ctr Adv Studies, Rumelinstr 23, D-72070 Tubingen, Germany
关键词
forensic science; craniofacial morphometry; intraobserver error; geometric morphometrics; repeated measures ANOVA; intraclass correlation coefficient; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; REPEATABILITY; SHAPE; PRECISION;
D O I
10.1111/1556-4029.13301
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
Intraobserver error (INTRA-OE) is the difference between repeated measurements of the same variable made by the same observer. The objective of this work was to evaluate INTRA-OE from 3D landmarks registered with a Microscribe, in different datasets: (A)the 3D coordinates, (B) linear measurements calculated from A, and (C) the six-first principal component axes. INTRA-OE was analyzed by digitizing 42 landmarks from 23 skulls in three events two weeks apart from each other. Systematic error was tested through repeated measures ANOVA (ANOVA-RM), while random error through intraclass correlation coefficient. Results showed that the largest differences between the three observations were found in the first dataset. Some anatomical points like nasion, ectoconchion, temporosphenoparietal, asterion, and temporomandibular presented the highest INTRA-OE. In the second dataset, local distances had higher INTRA-OE than global distances while the third dataset showed the lowest INTRA-OE.
引用
收藏
页码:741 / 746
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing 3D Descriptors for Local Search of Craniofacial Landmarks
    Sukno, Federico M.
    Waddington, John L.
    Whelan, Paul F.
    ADVANCES IN VISUAL COMPUTING, ISVC 2012, PT II, 2012, 7432 : 92 - 103
  • [2] Comparisons of craniofacial dysmorphology in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder using 3D geometric morphometrics
    Hennessy, R. J.
    Baldwin, P. A.
    Browne, D. J.
    Kinsella, A.
    Waddington, J. L.
    SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2007, 33 (02) : 335 - 335
  • [3] Measurement error using a SeeMaLab structured light 3D scanner against a Microscribe 3D digitizer
    Messer, Dolores
    Svendsen, Michelle S.
    Galatius, Anders
    Olsen, Morten T.
    Dahl, Vedrana A.
    Conradsen, Knut
    Dahl, Anders B.
    PEERJ, 2021, 9
  • [4] Standardisation in 3D Geometric Morphometrics: Ethics, Ownership, and Methods
    Hirst, Cara S.
    White, Suzanna
    Smith, Sian E.
    ARCHAEOLOGIES-JOURNAL OF THE WORLD ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONGRESS, 2018, 14 (02): : 272 - 298
  • [5] Standardisation in 3D Geometric Morphometrics: Ethics, Ownership, and Methods
    Cara S. Hirst
    Suzanna White
    Sian E. Smith
    Archaeologies, 2018, 14 : 272 - 298
  • [6] Measuring 3D shape in orthodontics through geometric morphometrics
    Luis Huanca Ghislanzoni
    Roberta Lione
    Paola Cozza
    Lorenzo Franchi
    Progress in Orthodontics, 18
  • [7] Measuring 3D shape in orthodontics through geometric morphometrics
    Ghislanzoni, Luis Huanca
    Lione, Roberta
    Cozza, Paola
    Franchi, Lorenzo
    PROGRESS IN ORTHODONTICS, 2017, 18
  • [8] 3D approaches in paleoanthropology using geometric morphometrics and laser scanning
    Delson, Eric
    Wiley, David
    Harcourt-Smith, William
    JOURNAL OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY, 2006, 26 (03) : 55A - 56A
  • [9] Ecomorphological variation in Artiodactyl calcanei using 3D geometric morphometrics
    Dunn, Rachel H.
    Avery, Jori E.
    ANATOMICAL RECORD-ADVANCES IN INTEGRATIVE ANATOMY AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2021, 304 (07): : 1529 - 1540
  • [10] Analysis of Hyoid–Larynx Complex Using 3D Geometric Morphometrics
    Anthony Loth
    Julien Corny
    Laure Santini
    Laurie Dahan
    Patrick Dessi
    Pascal Adalian
    Nicolas Fakhry
    Dysphagia, 2015, 30 : 357 - 364