The impact of urbanization and climate change on ecosystem services: A case study of the city belt along the Yellow River in Ningxia, China

被引:45
|
作者
Lyu, Rongfang [1 ,2 ]
Clarke, Keith C. [3 ]
Zhang, Jianming [1 ,2 ]
Jia, Xuehui [2 ]
Feng, Junli [2 ]
Li, Jijun [2 ]
机构
[1] Lanzhou Univ, Inst Studies Cty Econ Dev, 222 Tianshui South Rd, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China
[2] Lanzhou Univ, Coll Earth & Environm Sci, 222 Tianshui South Rd, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Geog, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ecosystem services; Climate change; Land use change; Trade-offs; Scenario prediction; LAND-USE CHANGE; TRADE-OFFS; URBAN-GROWTH; SPATIOTEMPORAL ASSESSMENT; NUTRIENT RETENTION; CHANGE SCENARIOS; YINCHUAN BASIN; BUNDLES; SYNERGIES; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101351
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Understanding the impacts of climate and land use changes driven by urbanization upon ecosystem services (ESs) has great importance in ES management and policy making. However, knowledge of their impacts on ESs correlation and bundles are still lacking. This study quantified five ESs in a spatially explicit manner for 1989-2017 in the City Belt along the Yellow River in Ningxia, China. Ten scenarios based on two Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP 2.6 and 8.5) and five urban expansion policies, were used to predict the potential change of ESs in 2017-2045. Temporal trade-off and synergy relations among ESs were analyzed using correlation analysis, while ES bundles were delineated and mapped through a self-organizing map. Results indicated that climate change has larger impacts on sand fixation and carbon sequestration, especially in mountain areas. In 2017-2045, RCP 8.5 would result in a larger increase in sand fixation (by 1.75 times to 2045) and a slight decrease in carbon sequestration (by 1.62%) than RCP 2.6. Land use change has a more substantial impact on the other three ESs than climate change, especially in the central plain. Specifically, cropland reclamation during 1989-2017 and urban expansion in 2017-2045 caused the most intense alterations in ESs. Reclamation can increase food production and nutrient retention, but reduce recreational opportunity, while urban expansion has the opposite impacts. Encouraging compact urban growth, creating riparian vegetation buffers and environment protection policies can effectively reduce the trade-offs and simultaneous losses among ESs. Specific recommendations are proposed for different sub-regions indicated by the ES bundle classification. Our results can provide references for urban planning to enhance ESs under future global warming.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Land fragmentation and variation of ecosystem services in the context of rapid urbanization: the case of Taizhou city, China
    Qi, Zhi-Fang
    Ye, Xin-Yue
    Zhang, Hao
    Yu, Zi-Long
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2014, 28 (04) : 843 - 855
  • [42] Land fragmentation and variation of ecosystem services in the context of rapid urbanization: the case of Taizhou city, China
    Zhi-Fang Qi
    Xin-Yue Ye
    Hao Zhang
    Zi-Long Yu
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2014, 28 : 843 - 855
  • [43] Impact assessment on ecosystem to climate change in, Heihe River basin in NW China
    Sun Landong
    Xu Zhongmin
    Ren Zhenhe
    REMOTE SENSING AND MODELING OF ECOSYSTEMS FOR SUSTAINABILITY IV, 2007, 6679
  • [44] On the spatial relationship between ecosystem services and urbanization: A case study in Wuhan, China
    Zhang, Yan
    Liu, Yanfang
    Zhang, Yang
    Liu, Yi
    Zhang, Guangxia
    Chen, Yiyun
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 637 : 780 - 790
  • [45] Impact of climate and land use change on ecosystem services: A case study of Samutsakorn province, Thailand
    Monprapussorn, Sathaporn
    ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2018, 47 : 45 - 49
  • [46] Urbanization Intensifies the Mismatch between the Supply and Demand of Regional Ecosystem Services: A Large-Scale Case of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China
    Liu, Huayan
    Xiao, Wenfa
    Zhu, Jianhua
    Zeng, Lixiong
    Li, Qi
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (20)
  • [47] Does China's Yangtze River Economic Belt policy impact on local ecosystem services?
    Luo, Qiaoling
    Luo, Yanlong
    Zhou, Qingfeng
    Song, Yan
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 676 : 231 - 241
  • [48] Impact of urbanization on energy demand: An empirical study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China
    Yu, Yantuan
    Zhang, Ning
    Kim, Jong Dae
    ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 139
  • [49] Response of ecosystem carbon storage to land use change from 1985 to 2050 in the Ningxia Section of Yellow River Basin, China
    LIN Yanmin
    HU Zhirui
    LI Wenhui
    CHEN Haonan
    WANG Fang
    NAN Xiongxiong
    YANG Xuelong
    ZHANG Wenjun
    JournalofAridLand, 2024, 16 (01) : 110 - 130
  • [50] Relationship between Climate-Shaped Urbanization and Forest Ecological Function: A Case Study of the Yellow River Basin, China
    Gu, Xiaobing
    Wang, Guangyu
    Zhang, Shunli
    Feng, Linyan
    Sharma, Ram P.
    Zhou, Huoyan
    Fu, Liyong
    Wu, Qingjun
    Dou, Yaquan
    Zhao, Xiaodi
    LAND, 2023, 12 (11)