Planar Hall effect bridge sensors with NiFe/Cu/IrMn stack optimized for self-field magnetic bead detection

被引:12
|
作者
Henriksen, Anders Dahl [1 ]
Rizzi, Giovanni [1 ]
Hansen, Mikkel Fougt [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, DTU Nanotech, Dept Micro & Nanotechnol, Bldg 345 East, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
关键词
MAGNETORESISTIVE SENSOR; BROWNIAN RELAXATION; BIOSENSORS; LABELS;
D O I
10.1063/1.4943033
中图分类号
O59 [应用物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
The stack composition in trilayer Planar Hall effect bridge sensors is investigated experimentally to identify the optimal stack for magnetic bead detection using the sensor self-field. The sensors were fabricated using exchange-biased stacks Ni80Fe20(t(FM))/Cu(t(Cu))/Mn80Ir20(10 nm) with t(FM) = 10, 20, and 30 nm, and 0 <= t(Cu) <= 0.6 nm. The sensors were characterized by magnetic hysteresis measurements, by measurements of the sensor response vs. applied field, and by measurements of the sensor response to a suspension of magnetic beads magnetized by the sensor self-field due to the sensor bias current. The exchange bias field was found to decay exponentially with tCu and inversely with t(FM). The reduced exchange field for larger values of t(FM) and tCu resulted in higher sensitivities to both magnetic fields and magnetic beads. We argue that the maximum magnetic bead signal is limited by Joule heating of the sensors and, thus, that the magnetic stacks should be compared at constant power consumption. For a fixed sensor geometry, the figure of merit for this comparison is the magnetic field sensitivity normalized by the sensor bias voltage. In this regard, we found that sensors with t(FM) = 20 nm or 30 nm outperformed those with t(FM) = 10 nm by a factor of approximately two, because the latter have a reduced AMR ratio. Further, the optimum layer thicknesses, t(Cu) approximate to 0.6 nm and t(FM) <= 20-30 nm, gave a 90% higher signal compared to the corresponding sensors with t(Cu) = 0nm. (C) 2016 AIP Publishing LLC.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [21] Planar Hall Effect in Spin Valve Structure for DNA Detection Immobilized with Single Magnetic Bead
    Bajaj, Bharat
    Thanh, N. T.
    Kim, C. G.
    2007 7TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON NANOTECHNOLOGY, VOL 1-3, 2007, : 1037 - 1040
  • [22] Reversible and irreversible temperature-induced changes in exchange-biased planar Hall effect bridge (PHEB) magnetic field sensors
    Rizzi, G.
    Lundtoft, N. C.
    Osterberg, F. W.
    Hansen, M. F.
    NANOTECHNOLOGY 2012, VOL 2: ELECTRONICS, DEVICES, FABRICATION, MEMS, FLUIDICS AND COMPUTATIONAL, 2012, : 215 - 218
  • [23] Simulation and Experimental Results on Manipulation and Detection of Magnetic Nanoparticles Using Planar Hall Effect Sensors
    Volmer, M.
    Avram, M.
    Avram, A. M.
    2015 INTERNATIONAL SEMICONDUCTOR CONFERENCE (CAS), 2015, : 117 - 120
  • [24] Magnetic Source Detection Using an Array of Planar Hall Effect Sensors and Machine Learning Algorithms
    Vizel, Miki
    Alimi, Roger
    Lahav, Daniel
    Schultz, Moty
    Grosz, Asaf
    Klein, Lior
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2025, 15 (02):
  • [25] Partial Discharge Detection in Pressboards Immersed in Mineral Insulation Oil with Quantum Well Hall Effect Magnetic Field Sensors
    Atalar, Fatih
    Dokur, Emrah
    Balaban, Ertan
    Missous, Mohamed
    Ugur, Mukden
    IEEE Access, 2022, 10 : 70362 - 70369
  • [26] Partial Discharge Detection in Pressboards Immersed in Mineral Insulation Oil With Quantum Well Hall Effect Magnetic Field Sensors
    Atalar, Fatih
    Dokur, Emrah
    Balaban, Ertan
    Missous, Mohamed
    Ugur, Mukden
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 70362 - 70369