Microwave Radiometer Radio-Frequency Interference Detection Algorithms: A Comparative Study

被引:73
|
作者
Misra, Sidharth [1 ]
Mohammed, Priscilla N. [2 ,3 ]
Guener, Baris [4 ]
Ruf, Christopher S. [1 ]
Piepmeier, Jeffrey R. [2 ]
Johnson, Joel T. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Space Phys Res Lab, Dept Atmospher Ocean & Space Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Microwave Instrument Technol Branch, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[3] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, Goddard Earth Sci & Technol Ctr, Baltimore, MD 21250 USA
[4] Halliburton Energy Serv, Houston, TX 77032 USA
[5] Ohio State Univ, Electrosci Lab, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 2009年 / 47卷 / 11期
关键词
Detectors; noise measurement; radiometry; radio spectrum management; remote sensing; MITIGATION; RFI; LAND; SEA;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2009.2031104
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Two algorithms used in microwave radiometry for radio-frequency interference (RFI) detection and mitigation are the pulse detection algorithm and the kurtosis detection algorithm. The relative performance of the algorithms is compared both analytically and empirically. Their probabilities of false alarm under RFI-free conditions and of detection when RFI is present are examined. The downlink data rate required to implement each algorithm in a spaceborne application is also considered. The kurtosis algorithm is compared to a pulse detection algorithm operating under optimal RFI detection conditions. The performance of both algorithms is also analyzed as a function of varying characteristics of the RFI. The RFI detection probabilities of both algorithms under varying subsampling conditions are compared and validated using data obtained from a field campaign. Implementation details, resource usage, and postprocessing requirements are also addressed for both algorithms.
引用
收藏
页码:3742 / 3754
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Detection and Correction of AMSR-E Radio-Frequency Interference
    吴莹
    翁富忠
    Journal of Meteorological Research, 2011, 25 (05) : 669 - 681
  • [32] Detection and correction of AMSR-E radio-frequency interference
    Wu Ying
    Weng Fuzhong
    ACTA METEOROLOGICA SINICA, 2011, 25 (05): : 669 - 681
  • [33] RADIO-FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE DEPTH SOUNDING
    ROSSITER, JR
    ANNAN, AP
    WATTS, RW
    STRANGWA.DW
    GEOPHYSICS, 1971, 36 (06) : 1277 - &
  • [34] HF Radio-Frequency Interference Mitigation
    Chen, Gang
    Zhao, Zhengyu
    Zhu, Guoqiang
    Huang, Yujie
    Li, Ting
    IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2010, 7 (03) : 479 - 482
  • [35] RADIO-FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS
    HEPFNER, ST
    SKELLY, MF
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 313 (06): : 387 - 387
  • [36] Characterizing transient radio-frequency interference
    Czech, Daniel
    Mishra, Amit
    Inggs, Michael
    RADIO SCIENCE, 2017, 52 (07) : 841 - 851
  • [37] RADIO-FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE AT ORBITAL ALTITUDES
    HOFFMAN, LA
    HURLBUT, KH
    ZAMITES, CJ
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY, 1966, EMC8 (01) : 1 - &
  • [38] Radio Frequency Interference Detection for SMAP Radiometer Using Convolutional Neural Networks
    Alam, Ahmed Manavi
    Kurum, Mehmet
    Gurbuz, Ali C.
    IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 15 : 10099 - 10112
  • [39] COMPARISON OF RADIO-FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE MITIGATION STRATEGIES FOR DISPERSED PULSE DETECTION
    Hogden, John
    Vander Wiel, Scott
    Bower, Geoffrey C.
    Michalak, Sarah
    Siemion, Andrew
    Werthimer, Daniel
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 747 (02):
  • [40] MICROWAVE AND RADIO-FREQUENCY EXPOSURE LIMITS
    HARLEN, F
    IEE PROCEEDINGS-A-SCIENCE MEASUREMENT AND TECHNOLOGY, 1981, 128 (09): : 589 - 592