Comparison of the efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg vs levocetirizine 5 mg for the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria: a multi-centre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study

被引:99
|
作者
Zuberbier, T. [1 ]
Oanta, A. [2 ]
Bogacka, E. [3 ]
Medina, I. [4 ]
Wesel, F. [5 ]
Uhl, P. [6 ]
Antepara, I. [7 ]
Jauregui, I. [7 ]
Valiente, R. [8 ]
机构
[1] Charite, Allergie Ctr Charite, Dept Dermatol & Allergy, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[2] SC Dermamed SRL, Brasov, Romania
[3] NZOZ Mat Med, Wroclaw, Poland
[4] Ctr Med Vitae, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[5] Cabinet Allergol, Nantes, France
[6] Arzt Haut u Geschlechlskrankheiten Allergol, Berlin, Germany
[7] Hosp Basurto, Serv Alergol, Bilbao, Spain
[8] FAES FARMA SA, Bilbao, Spain
关键词
bilastine; chronic idiopathic urticaria; Dermatology Life Quality Index; H(1)antihistamine; total symptoms score; LIFE QUALITY INDEX; EAACI/GA(2)LEN/EDF GUIDELINE; DESLORATADINE; MANAGEMENT; CETIRIZINE; PARALLEL; POTENT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02217.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
P>Background: Bilastine is a novel nonsedative H-1-receptor antagonist, which may be used for the symptomatic treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria (CU). The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg vs levocetirizine 5 mg and placebo in CU patients with moderate-to-severe symptoms. Methods: Overall 525 male and female subjects aged 18-70 years were randomized to receive bilastine 20 mg, levocetirizine 5 mg or placebo, once daily for 28 days, in double-blind manner, in 46 centres across Europe and Argentina. Patients rated symptoms of pruritus, number of wheals, and maximum size of wheals (on predefined scales) as reflective (over past 12 h) symptoms twice daily, for assessment of change from baseline in the total symptoms scores (TSS) over 28 days as the primary efficacy measure. Changes in reflective and instantaneous symptoms scores, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and CU-associated discomfort and sleep disturbance were assessed as secondary outcomes. Safety was assessed according to adverse events, laboratory tests and electrocardiograms. Results: Bilastine reduced patients' mean reflective and instantaneous TSS from baseline to a significantly greater degree than placebo (P < 0.001); from day 2 onwards of treatment. The DLQI, general discomfort, and sleep disruption were also improved significantly in bilastine-treated patients as compared with placebo-treated patients (P < 0.001 for all parameters). Comparison with levocetirizine indicated both treatments to be equally efficacious as well as equally safe and well tolerated as compared with placebo. Conclusions: Bilastine 20 mg is a novel effective and safe treatment option for the management of CU.
引用
收藏
页码:516 / 528
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Tenoxicam 20 mg or 40 mg after thoracotomy: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Merry, AF
    Sidebotham, DA
    Middleton, NG
    Calder, MV
    Webster, CS
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2002, 30 (02) : 160 - 166
  • [22] Efficacy and safety of vilazodone 20 and 40 mg in major depressive disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Mathews, Maju
    Gommoll, Carl
    Chen, Dalei
    Nunez, Rene
    Khan, Arif
    INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 30 (02) : 67 - 74
  • [23] ACRIVASTINE VERSUS CLEMASTINE IN THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC IDIOPATHIC URTICARIA - A DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY
    JUHLIN, L
    GIBSON, JR
    HARVEY, SG
    HUSON, LW
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 1987, 26 (10) : 653 - 654
  • [24] Efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg compared with cetirizine 10 mg and placebo for the symptomatic treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study
    Kuna, P.
    Bachert, C.
    Nowacki, Z.
    van Cauwenberge, P.
    Agache, I.
    Fouquert, L.
    Roger, A.
    Sologuren, A.
    Valiente, R.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2009, 39 (09): : 1338 - 1347
  • [25] Efficacy and Safety of Duloxetine 30 mg/d in Patients With Fibromyalgia A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study
    Arnold, Lesley M.
    Zhang, Shuyu
    Pangallo, Beth A.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2012, 28 (09): : 775 - 781
  • [26] Rizatriptan 5 mg for the acute treatment of migraine in adolescents: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Winner, P
    Lewis, D
    Visser, WH
    Jiang, KH
    Ahrens, S
    Evans, JK
    HEADACHE, 2002, 42 (01): : 49 - 55
  • [27] Citicoline in intracerebral haemorrhage:: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multi-centre pilot study
    Secades, Julio J.
    Alvarez-Sabin, Jose
    Rubio, Francisco
    Lozano, Rafael
    Davalos, Antoni
    Castillo, Jose
    CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2006, 21 (5-6) : 380 - 385
  • [28] Efficacy and safety of tadalafil 5, 10, and 20 mg in Japanese men with erectile dysfunction: Results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Nagao, Koichi
    Kimoto, Yasusuke
    Marumo, Ken
    Tsujimura, Akira
    Vail, G. Matthew
    Watts, Steven
    Ishii, Nobuhisa
    Kamidono, Sadao
    UROLOGY, 2006, 68 (04) : 845 - 851
  • [29] Safety and efficacy of cetirizine versus cetirizine plus ranitidine in chronic urticaria: Double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study
    Guevara-Gutierrez, Elizabeth
    Bonilla-Lopez, Sonia
    Hernandez-Arana, Socorro
    Tlacuilo-Parra, Alberto
    JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT, 2015, 26 (06) : 548 - 550
  • [30] Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of safety and efficacy of miltefosine in antihistamine-resistant chronic spontaneous urticaria
    Magerl, M.
    Rother, M.
    Bieber, T.
    Biedermann, T.
    Brasch, J.
    Dominicus, R.
    Hunzelmann, N.
    Jakob, T.
    Mahler, V.
    Popp, G.
    Schaekel, K.
    Schlingensiepen, R.
    Schmitt, J.
    Siebenhaar, F.
    Simon, J. C.
    Staubach, P.
    Wedi, B.
    Weidner, C.
    Maurer, M.
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2013, 27 (03) : e363 - e369