Effect of food variety on intake of a meal: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:26
|
作者
Embling, Rochelle [1 ]
Pink, Aimee E. [1 ,2 ]
Gatzemeier, Jennifer [1 ]
Price, Menna [1 ]
Lee, Michelle D. [1 ]
Wilkinson, Laura L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Swansea Univ, Coll Human & Hlth Sci, Dept Psychol, Swansea, W Glam, Wales
[2] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Social Sci, Singapore, Singapore
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION | 2021年 / 113卷 / 03期
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
food variety; intake; systematic review; meta-analysis; dietary diversity; SENSORY-SPECIFIC SATIETY; DIETARY VARIETY; VEGETABLE INTAKE; NORMAL-WEIGHT; ENERGY-INTAKE; FLAVOR VARIETY; ACCEPTANCE; INCREASES; CHOICE; LIKING;
D O I
10.1093/ajcn/nqaa352
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background: Many studies have shown that food variety-the presence of multiple foods and/or sensory characteristics within and across meals-increases intake. However, studies report mixed findings, and effect size remains unclear. Objectives: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to 1) synthesize data across experimental studies that examined effects of variety on total meal intake, relative to a control condition with comparatively less variety; 2) quantify support for this effect; and 3) assist in the identification of important moderating factors (registration: CRD42019153585). Methods: In November 2019, we searched the following databases for relevant experimental studies, published in English from 1980. with human participants: PubMed. Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, PsycINFO, and OpenGrey. This search was updated in September 2020. Means, standard deviations, and sample sizes were extracted from included articles, and Hedges' g was used to calculate effect sizes. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. Results: Of 7259 references identified in an initial search, 34 articles consisting of 37 studies contained sufficient information for review, and data from 30 studies (39 comparisons) were included in the meta-analysis. Results from a random-effects model showed a significant small to medium effect of variety on intake (in weight and energy), with greater variety being associated with increased consumption (Hedges' g = 0.405; 95% CI: 0.259, 0.552). However, heterogeneity was considerable across studies (I-2 = 84%), and this was unexplained by subgroup analyses based on form of variety, test foods, sensory characteristics, age, sex, and body weight. Conclusions: Our findings support the conclusion that variety is a robust driver of food intake. However, risk of bias was high across studies, and this review highlights methodologic limitations of studies. It is recommended that further attention is given to the development of preregistered, well-powered randomized controlled studies in eating behavior research.
引用
收藏
页码:716 / 741
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dietary Pulses, Satiety and Food Intake: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Acute Feeding Trials
    Li, Siying S.
    Kendall, Cyril W. C.
    de Souza, Russell J.
    Jayalath, Viranda H.
    Cozma, Adrian I.
    Ha, Vanessa
    Mirrahimi, Arash
    Chiavaroli, Laura
    Augustin, Livia S. A.
    Mejia, Sonia Blanco
    Leiter, Lawrence A.
    Beyene, Joseph
    Jenkins, David J. A.
    Sievenpiper, John L.
    OBESITY, 2014, 22 (08) : 1773 - 1780
  • [32] The influence of experimental confederate peers on children's food intake: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sharps, M. A.
    Coulthard, H.
    Salvy, S. J.
    Ryan, S.
    Fallon, V.
    APPETITE, 2022, 169
  • [33] Legume and Soy Food Intake and Incident Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tang, Jun
    Feng, Fengqin
    Zheng, Ju-sheng
    ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2019, 75 : 206 - 206
  • [34] Calorie reformulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the effect of manipulating food energy density on daily energy intake
    Eric Robinson
    Mercedes Khuttan
    India McFarland-Lesser
    Zina Patel
    Andrew Jones
    International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 19
  • [35] Calorie reformulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the effect of manipulating food energy density on daily energy intake
    Robinson, Eric
    Khuttan, Mercedes
    McFarland-Lesser, India
    Patel, Zina
    Jones, Andrew
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2022, 19 (01)
  • [36] The Effects of Food Advertisements on Food Intake and Neural Activity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Recent Experimental Studies
    Arrona-Cardoza, Pablo
    Labonte, Katherine
    Cisneros-Franco, Jose Miguel
    Nielsen, Daiva E.
    ADVANCES IN NUTRITION, 2023, 14 (02) : 339 - 351
  • [37] Food insecurity and hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Beltran, Sourik
    Pharel, Marissa
    Montgomery, Canada T.
    Lopez-Hinojosa, Itzel J.
    Arenas, Daniel J.
    DeLisser, Horace M.
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (11):
  • [38] Food environment and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pineda, Elisa
    Stockton, Jemima
    Scholes, Shaun
    Lassale, Camille
    Mindell, Jennifer S.
    BMJ NUTRITION, PREVENTION & HEALTH, 2024, 7 (01) : 204 - 211
  • [39] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Food Insecurity and Dyslipidemia
    Arenas, Daniel J.
    Beltr, Sourik
    Montgomery, Canada
    Pharel, Marissa
    Lopez-Hinojosa, Itzel
    Vila-Arroyo, Gilberto
    DeLisser, Horace M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (04) : 656 - 667
  • [40] The diagnosis of food allergy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Soares-Weiser, K.
    Takwoingi, Y.
    Panesar, S. S.
    Muraro, A.
    Werfel, T.
    Hoffmann-Sommergruber, K.
    Roberts, G.
    Halken, S.
    Poulsen, L.
    van Ree, R.
    Vlieg-Boerstra, B. J.
    Sheikh, A.
    ALLERGY, 2014, 69 (01) : 76 - 86