Treatment of rat spinal cord injury with a Rho-kinase inhibitor and bone marrow stromal cell transplantation

被引:33
|
作者
Furuya, Takeo [1 ]
Hashimoto, Masayuki [1 ]
Koda, Masao [1 ]
Okawa, Akihiko [1 ]
Murata, Atsushi [1 ]
Takahashi, Kazuhisa [1 ]
Yamashita, Toshihide [2 ]
Yamazaki, Masashi [1 ]
机构
[1] Chiba Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chuo Ku, Chiba 2608670, Japan
[2] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Mol Neurosci, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
关键词
Spinal cord injury; Rho-kinase inhibitor; Fasudil; Bone marrow stromal cell (BMSC); Cell transplantation; CHONDROITIN SULFATE PROTEOGLYCANS; PROMOTE FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY; CENTRAL-NERVOUS-SYSTEM; STEM-CELLS; ADULT-RAT; IN-VITRO; AXONAL REGENERATION; NEURONAL DEATH; SCHWANN-CELLS; NEURAL CELLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.brainres.2009.07.087
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
In light of reports that the administration of fasudil, a Rho-kinase inhibitor, improved rats locomotor abilities following spinal cord injury, we hypothesized that combining fasudil with another type of therapy, such as stem cell transplantation, might further improve the level of locomotor recovery. Bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) are readily available for stem cell therapy. in the present study, we examined whether fasudil combined with BMSC transplantation would produce synergistic effects on recovery. Adult female Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to spinal cord contusion injury at the T10 vertebral level using an IH impactor (200 Kdyn). Immediately after contusion, they were administrated fasudil intrathecally for 4 weeks. GFP rat-derived BMSCs (2.5x10(6)) were injected into the lesion site 14 days after contusion. Locomotor recovery was assessed for 9 weeks with BBB scoring. Sensory tests were conducted at 8 weeks. Biotinylated dextran amine (BDA) was injected into the sensory-motor cortex at 9 weeks. In addition to an untreated control group, the study also included a fasudil-only group and a BMSC-only group in order to compare the effects of combined therapy vs. single-agent therapy. Animals were perfused transcardially 11 weeks after contusion, and histological examinations were performed. The combined therapy group showed statistically better locomotor recovery than the untreated control group at 8 and 9 weeks after contusion. Neither of the two single-agent treatments improved open field locomotor function. Sensory tests showed no statistically significant difference by treatment. Histological and immunohistochemical studies provided some supporting evidence for better locomotor recovery following combined therapy. The average area of the cystic cavity was significantly smaller in the fasudil+BMSC group than in the control group. The number of 5-HT nerve fibers was significantly higher in the fasudil+BMSC group than in the control group on the rostral side of the lesion site. BDA-labeled fibers on the caudal side of the lesion epicenter were observed only in the fasudil+BMSC group. on the other hand, only small numbers of GFP-labeled grafted cells remained 9 weeks after transplantation, and these were mainly localized at the site of injection. Double immunofluorescence studies showed no evidence of differentiation of grafted BMSCs into glial cells or neurons. The Rho-kinase inhibitor fasudil combined with BMSC transplantation resulted in better locomotor recovery than occurred in the untreated control group. However, the data failed to demonstrate significant synergism from combined therapy compared with the levels of recovery following single-agent treatment. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 202
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spinal cord injury in rat: treatment with bone marrow stromal cell transplantation
    Chopp, M
    Zhang, XH
    Li, Y
    Wang, L
    Chen, JL
    Lu, DY
    Lu, M
    Rosenblum, M
    NEUROREPORT, 2000, 11 (13) : 3001 - 3005
  • [2] Analysis of bone marrow stromal cell transplantation for spinal cord injury in the rat
    Nakano, Norihiko
    Nakai, Yoshiyasu
    Ide, Chizuka
    NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2011, 71 : E338 - E338
  • [3] The future of bone marrow stromal cell transplantation for the treatment of spinal cord injury
    Enomoto, Mitsuhiro
    NEURAL REGENERATION RESEARCH, 2015, 10 (03) : 383 - 384
  • [4] The future of bone marrow stromal cell transplantation for the treatment of spinal cord injury
    Mitsuhiro Enomoto
    NeuralRegenerationResearch, 2015, 10 (03) : 383 - 384
  • [5] Bone marrow stromal cell transplantation for treatment of sub-acute spinal cord injury in the rat
    Ide, Chizuka
    Nakai, Yoshiyasu
    Nakano, Norihiko
    Seo, Tae-Beom
    Yamada, Yoshihiro
    Endo, Katsuaki
    Noda, Toru
    Saito, Fukuki
    Suzuki, Yoshihisa
    Fukushima, Masanori
    Nakatani, Toshio
    BRAIN RESEARCH, 2010, 1332 : 32 - 47
  • [6] Synergistic effects of bone marrow stromal cells and a Rho kinase (ROCK) inhibitor, Fasudil on axon regeneration in rat spinal cord injury
    Chiba, Yasuhiro
    Kuroda, Satoshi
    Shichinohe, Hideo
    Hokari, Masaaki
    Osanai, Toshiya
    Maruichi, Katsuhiko
    Yano, Shunsuke
    Hida, Kazutoshi
    Iwasaki, Yoshinobu
    NEUROPATHOLOGY, 2010, 30 (03) : 241 - 250
  • [7] Functional recovery after bone marrow stromal cell transplantation in rat with spinal cord injury
    Lee, I. W.
    Ahn, H. H.
    Lee, H. K.
    Lee, H. J.
    Yi, J. S.
    Yang, J. H.
    Lee, S. J.
    Khang, G.
    Lee, H. B.
    CELL TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 16 (03) : 332 - 332
  • [8] A possible role of RhoA/Rho-kinase in experimental spinal cord injury in rat
    Sung, JK
    Miao, L
    Calvert, JW
    Huang, LX
    Harkey, HL
    Zhang, JH
    BRAIN RESEARCH, 2003, 959 (01) : 29 - 38
  • [9] Cell transplantation for the treatment of spinal cord injury–bone marrow stromal cells and choroid plexus epithelial cells
    Chizuka Ide
    Norihiko Nakano
    Kenji Kanekiyo
    Neural Regeneration Research, 2016, 11 (09) : 1385 - 1388
  • [10] Cell transplantation for the treatment of spinal cord injury - bone marrow stromal cells and choroid plexus epithelial cells
    Ide, Chizuka
    Nakano, Norihiko
    Kanekiyo, Kenji
    NEURAL REGENERATION RESEARCH, 2016, 11 (09) : 1385 - 1388