Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidies with cell-free DNA in the general pregnancy population: a cost-effectiveness analysis

被引:42
|
作者
Fairbrother, Genevieve [1 ]
Burigo, John [2 ]
Sharon, Thomas [1 ]
Song, Ken [3 ]
机构
[1] Obstet & Gynecol Atlanta, Atlanta, GA USA
[2] Ob Gyn Specialists Palm Beaches PA, Palm Beach Gardens, FL USA
[3] Ariosa Diagnost Inc, 5945 Opt Court, San Jose, CA 95138 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE | 2016年 / 29卷 / 07期
关键词
Cell-free DNA; cost-effectiveness; Down syndrome; non-invasive prenatal testing; prenatal screening; DOWN-SYNDROME; NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY; MATERNAL AGE; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.3109/14767058.2015.1038703
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of fetal aneuploidy screening in the general pregnancy population using non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as compared to first trimester combined screening (FTS) with serum markers and NT ultrasound. Methods: Using a decision-analytic model, we estimated the number of fetal T21, T18, and T13 cases identified prenatally, the number of invasive procedures performed, corresponding normal fetus losses, and costs of screening using FTS or NIPT with cell-free DNA (cfDNA). Modeling was based on a 4 million pregnant women cohort, which represents annual births in the U.S. Results: For the general pregnancy population, NIPT identified 15% more trisomy cases, reduced invasive procedures by 88%, and reduced iatrogenic fetal loss by 94% as compared to FTS. The cost per trisomy case identified with FTS was $497909. At a NIPT unit, cost of $453 and below, there were cost savings as compared to FTS. Accounting for additional trisomy cases identified by NIPT, a NIPT unit cost of $665 provided the same per trisomy cost as that of FTS. Conclusions: NIPT in the general pregnancy population leads to more prenatal identification of fetal trisomy cases as compared to FTS and is more economical at a NIPT unit cost of $453.
引用
收藏
页码:1160 / 1164
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Noninvasive prenatal screening using cell-free DNA
    Mladenka, Christine
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2022, 34 (06) : 789 - 791
  • [42] Prenatal aneuploidy screening using cell-free DNA
    Wax, Joseph R.
    Chard, Renee
    Litton, Christian
    Pinette, Michael G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 213 (06) : 879 - 880
  • [43] Targeted fetal cell-free DNA screening for aneuploidies in 4,594 pregnancies: Single center study
    Koc, Altug
    Kaya, Ozge Ozer
    Ozyilmaz, Berk
    Kutbay, Yasar B.
    Kirbiyik, Ozgur
    Ozdemir, Taha R.
    Erdogan, Kadri M.
    Guvenc, Merve Saka
    Oztekin, Deniz C.
    Ozeren, Mehmet
    Pala, Halil G.
    Ekin, Atalay
    Gezer, Cenk
    Yildirim, Alkim G. Sahingoz
    Atakul, Bahar Konuralp
    Kurtulmus, Secil
    Turhan, Ugur
    Taner, Cuneyt E.
    MOLECULAR GENETICS & GENOMIC MEDICINE, 2019, 7 (07):
  • [44] Performance of a cell-free DNA prenatal screening test, choice of prenatal procedure, and chromosome conditions identified during pregnancy after low-risk cell-free DNA screening
    Scarff, Katrina L. L.
    Flowers, Nicola
    Love, Clare J. J.
    Archibald, Alison D. D.
    Hunt, Clare E. E.
    Giouzeppos, Olivia
    Elliott, Justine
    Delatycki, Martin B. B.
    Pertile, Mark D. D.
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2023, 43 (02) : 213 - 225
  • [45] Cell-free DNA fetal fraction and pregnancy outcome
    Chung, Eric
    Pierce, Brian
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (01) : S157 - S157
  • [46] Ultrasound as a second screen after positive cell-free DNA for trisomy 21: A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Avram, Carmen M.
    Shaffer, Brian L.
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (01) : S240 - S240
  • [47] Cost-effectiveness analysis of prenatal population-based fragile X carrier screening
    Musci, TJ
    Caughey, AB
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 192 (06) : 1905 - 1912
  • [48] Cost-effectiveness analysis of prenatal population-based fragile X carrier screening
    Musci, TJ
    Caughey, AB
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (06) : S117 - S117
  • [49] Implementation of maternal blood cell-free DNA testing in early screening for aneuploidies
    Gil, Maria M.
    Nicolaides, Kypros H.
    MEDIZINISCHE GENETIK, 2019, 31 (03) : 283 - 288
  • [50] Implementation of maternal blood cell-free DNA testing in early screening for aneuploidies
    Gil, M. M.
    Quezada, M. S.
    Bregant, B.
    Ferraro, M.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 42 (01) : 34 - 40