The design of an evaluation framework for diabetes self-management education and support programs delivered nationally

被引:9
|
作者
Olson, Jenny Louise [1 ,2 ,3 ]
White, Becky [1 ]
Mitchell, Helen [1 ]
Halliday, Jennifer [4 ,5 ]
Skinner, Timothy [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Schofield, Deborah [1 ]
Sweeting, Jennifer [1 ]
Watson, Natasha [1 ]
机构
[1] Diabet WA, Level 3,322 Hay St, Subiaco, WA, Australia
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Kinesiol, 276 Recreat Hall, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Penn State Univ, Coll Med, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
[4] Deakin Univ, Sch Psychol, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[5] Diabet Victoria, Australian Ctr Behav Res Diabet, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] La Trobe Univ, La Trobe Rural Hlth Sch, Bendigo, Vic, Australia
[7] Univ Copenhagen, Inst Psychol, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Implementation science; Program evaluation; Diabetes self-management education and support; Health services research; Self-management; Chronic disease; Diabetes mellitus; Self-determination; Psychosocial adjustment; STRUCTURED EDUCATION; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; INTERVENTIONS; EMPOWERMENT; DISTRESS; OUTCOMES; PEOPLE; ADULTS; TIME; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-021-07374-4
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The aim of this work was to develop a National Evaluation Framework to facilitate the standardization of delivery, quality, reporting, and evaluation of diabetes education and support programs delivered throughout Australia through the National Diabetes Services Scheme (NDSS). The NDSS is funded by the Australian Government, and provides access to diabetes information, education, support, and subsidized product across diverse settings in each state and territory of Australia through seven independent service-providers. This article reports the approach undertaken to develop the Framework. Methods A participatory approach was undertaken, focused on adopting nationally consistent outcomes and indicators, nominating objectives and measurement tools, specifying evaluation processes, and developing quality standards. Existing programs were classified based on related, overarching indicators enabling the adoption of a tiered system of evaluation. Results Two outcomes (i.e., improved clinical, reduced cost) and four indicators (i.e., improved knowledge and understanding, self-management, self-determination, psychosocial adjustment) were adopted from the Eigenmann and Colagiuri national consensus position statement for diabetes education. This allowed for the identification of objectives (i.e., improved empowerment, reduced distress, autonomy supportive program delivery, consumer satisfaction) and related measurement instruments. Programs were categorized as comprehensive, topic-specific, or basic education, with comprehensive programs allocated to receive the highest-level of evaluation. Eight quality standards were developed, with existing programs tested against those standards. Based on the results of testing, two comprehensive (OzDAFNE for people with type 1 diabetes, DESMOND for people with type 2 diabetes), and eight topic-specific (CarbSmart, ShopSmart, MonitorSmart, FootSmart, MedSmart, Living with Insulin, Insulin Pump Workshop, Ready Set Go - Let's Move) structured diabetes self-management education and support programs were nominated for national delivery. Conclusions The National Evaluation Framework has facilitated consistency of program quality, delivery, and evaluation of programs delivered by multiple service providers across diverse contexts. The Framework could be applied by other service providers who facilitate multiple diabetes education and support programs and could be adapted for use in other chronic disease populations where education and support are indicated.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Improving self-management and diabetes education programs through analytics and automation
    Tsai, Shih-Tzer
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2016, 120 : S32 - S32
  • [32] Outcomes of different communication channels of diabetes self-management education programs
    Pelikan, J. M.
    Roethlin, F.
    Ganahl, K.
    Peer, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 26 : 309 - 309
  • [33] Organizational conditions for providing effective diabetes self-management education programs
    Clemens, T.
    Sorensen, K.
    Brand, H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 26
  • [34] Design and Evaluation of Diabetes Self-Management mHealth Apps
    Goyal, Shivani
    DIABETES, 2017, 66 : LB30 - LB31
  • [35] Care Partner Support Following a Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support Intervention
    Mansfield, Kelly J.
    Colicchio, Vanessa D.
    Tuitama, Adonica I. Kauwe
    Tracy, Eunjin Lee
    Neuberger, Julie D.
    Litchman, Michelle L.
    SCIENCE OF DIABETES SELF-MANAGEMENT AND CARE, 2022, 48 (04): : 235 - 246
  • [36] Reducing the Risks of Diabetes Complications Through Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support
    Kent, Dan
    Melkus, Gail D'Eramo
    Stuart, Patricia W.
    McKoy, June M.
    Urbanski, Patti
    Boren, Suzanne Austin
    Coke, Lola
    Winters, Janis E.
    Horsley, Neil L.
    Sherr, Dawn
    Lipman, Ruth
    POPULATION HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2013, 16 (02) : 74 - 81
  • [37] Design Considerations for Internet-Delivered Self-Management Programs for Adults With Hearing Impairment
    Preminger, Jill E.
    Rothpletz, Ann M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2016, 25 (03) : 272 - 277
  • [38] INTERMEDIATE-TERM EFFECTS OF DIABETES SELF-MANAGEMENT SUPPORT DELIVERED VIA MHEALTH
    Aikens, James E.
    Piette, John
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2016, 50 : S112 - S112
  • [39] Appraisal the structure of diabetes self-management education and support in diabetes education units of Isfahan, Iran
    Alijani, Marzieh
    Siavash, Mansour
    Abazari, Parvaneh
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND HEALTH PROMOTION, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [40] Capacity of Diabetes Education Programs to Provide Both Diabetes Self-management Education and to Implement Diabetes Prevention Services
    Butcher, Marcene K.
    Vanderwood, Karl K.
    Hall, Taryn O.
    Gohdes, Dorothy
    Helgerson, Steven D.
    Harwell, Todd S.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE, 2011, 17 (03): : 242 - 247