Geometric properties of 2D and 3D unilateral large slip contact operators

被引:11
|
作者
Heegaard, JH [1 ]
Curnier, A [1 ]
机构
[1] ECOLE POLYTECH FED LAUSANNE, DEPT MECAN, LAB MECAN APPL, CH-1015 LAUSANNE, SWITZERLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0045-7825(95)00977-9
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In order to treat the unilateral (frictionless) large slip contact between a deformable body and a smooth rigid obstacle, geometrical properties associated to smooth curves (2D) and surfaces (3D) are investigated. Starting from basic differential geometry properties of smooth 2D curves, the kinematics of node-to-node or node-to-facet contact is generalized: the projection of a potential contactor point (striker) on any parametrizable curve and its first variation are derived. Expressions for the contact gap and its first and second variations are then calculated to obtain force equilibrium conditions and associated consistent linearization. These results are extended to 3D geometries: intrinsic properties of smooth surfaces, related to their first and second fundamental forms are introduced and serve to characterize the projection of a striker on the surface. The signed contact gap and its first two variations are then expressed explicitly. These results are specialized to the particular case where cubic Hermite curves and surfaces are considered. The resulting contact element features are illustrated with a Hertz contact benchmark problem and with a 3D model of the human patella (knee-cap) sliding over the femur during knee flexion.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 286
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Algorithmic stabilization of FE analyses of 2D frictional contact problems with large slip
    Liu, WN
    Meschke, G
    Mang, HA
    COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2003, 192 (16-18) : 2099 - 2124
  • [22] Prenatal diagnosis of unilateral megalencephaly by 2D and 3D ultrasound: A case report
    Hafner, E
    Bock, W
    Zoder, G
    Schuchter, K
    Rosen, A
    Plattner, M
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1999, 19 (02) : 159 - 162
  • [23] 21/2D or 3D?
    Roth, S
    Küster, B
    Sura, H
    KUNSTSTOFFE-PLAST EUROPE, 2004, 94 (07): : 65 - 67
  • [24] 2D and 3D on demand
    Philippi, Anne
    F & M; Feinwerktechnik, Mikrotechnik, Messtechnik, 1998, 106 (06): : 412 - 414
  • [25] From 2D to 3D
    Steven De Feyter
    Nature Chemistry, 2011, 3 (1) : 14 - 15
  • [26] Influence of 3D Integration on 2D Interconnections and 2D Self Inductors HF Properties
    Roullard, J.
    Capraro, S.
    Lacrevaz, T.
    Cadix, L.
    Eid, E.
    Farcy, A.
    Flechet, B.
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON 3D SYSTEMS INTEGRATION, 2009, : 126 - +
  • [27] A differential-geometric approach for 2D and 3D object grasping and manipulation
    Arimoto, Suguru
    ANNUAL REVIEWS IN CONTROL, 2007, 31 (02) : 189 - 209
  • [28] 3D reconstruction of complex geometric solids from 2D line drawings
    1600, Association for Computing Machinery, 2 Penn Plaza, Suite 701, New York, NY 10121-0701, United States
  • [29] Lifting 2D Object Detections to 3D: A Geometric Approach in Multiple Views
    Rubino, Cosimo
    Fusiello, Andrea
    Del Bue, Alessio
    IMAGE ANALYSIS AND PROCESSING,(ICIAP 2017), PT I, 2017, 10484 : 561 - 572
  • [30] Automation of 2D and 3D bridge deck representations based on a geometric database
    Sampaio, AA
    DEVELOPMENTS IN ENGINEERING COMPUTATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2000, : 43 - 50