Offshore wind farm layout optimization regarding wake effects and electrical losses

被引:46
|
作者
Amaral, Luis [1 ]
Castro, Rui [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Lisbon, INESC, ID IST, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Offshore wind energy; Electrical losses; Wake effect; Genetic Algorithm; Particle Swarm Optimization; GENETIC ALGORITHM; PARTICLE SWARM; TURBINES; DESIGN; ENERGY; PLACEMENT; EUROPE; SYSTEM; SPACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.engappai.2017.01.010
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
A major development of the offshore wind energy market is being witnessed. Since the implicated costs are considerably high, it is extremely important to ensure that the energy production is maximum, so that the costs per energy unit are minimized. Thus, the turbines should be strategically positioned to extract as much energy as possible from the wind, considering wake effect losses, as well as internal grid electrical losses. In order to avoid turbines to be placed in unrealistic positions, they should be distributed according to a grid of rectangular shaped cells; each of these is divided in multiple sub-cells. The problem of finding the turbines optimal position among the pre-defined sub-cells so that maximum annual energy is produced could be addressed using a deterministic approach. However, the problem becomes unfeasible when the number of turbines and/or the number of sub-cells increase. To overcome this difficulty, optimization techniques should be used. Genetic Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization are approached in this paper. This paper deals with the wind park layout optimization problem. A methodology to position the turbines inside a wind park so that the annual energy production is maximum is proposed. The results proved that the meta-heuristic method is much more CPU time efficient in providing the maximum annual year production as compared to the traditional deterministic approach.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 34
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Wind Resource Analysis and Optimization of Offshore Wind Farm Layout in the Central Taiwan
    Chang, Pei-Chi
    Lai, Chi-Ming
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART GRID AND SMART CITIES (ICSGSC), 2017, : 126 - 131
  • [22] Layout Optimization Algorithms for the Offshore Wind Farm with Different Densities Using a Full-Field Wake Model
    Liang, Zhichang
    Liu, Haixiao
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (16)
  • [23] A novel technique for the optimal design of offshore wind farm electrical layout
    Chen, Yingying
    Dong, Zhaoyang
    Meng, Ke
    Luo, Fengji
    Yao, Weifeng
    Qiu, Jing
    JOURNAL OF MODERN POWER SYSTEMS AND CLEAN ENERGY, 2013, 1 (03) : 258 - 263
  • [24] Wake losses optimization of offshore wind farms with moveable floating wind turbines
    Rodrigues, S. F.
    Pinto, R. Teixeira
    Soleimanzadeh, M.
    Bosman, Peter A. N.
    Bauer, P.
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 89 : 933 - 941
  • [25] Overall Optimization for Offshore Wind Farm Electrical System
    Hou, Peng
    Hu, Weihao
    Chen, Cong
    Chen, Zhe
    WIND ENERGY, 2017, 20 (06) : 1017 - 1032
  • [26] Comparisons of the accuracy of different wake models in wind farm layout optimization
    Gao, Xiaoxia
    Li, Yue
    Zhao, Fei
    Sun, Haiying
    ENERGY EXPLORATION & EXPLOITATION, 2020, 38 (05) : 1725 - 1741
  • [27] Optimization of wind farm layout considering wake effect and multiple parameters
    Markarian, Shant
    Fazelpour, Farivar
    Markarian, Elin
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2019, 38 (05)
  • [28] Wind farm layout and hub height optimization with a novel wake model
    Sun, Haiying
    Yang, Hongxing
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2023, 348
  • [29] Integrated Layout and Support Structure Optimization for Offshore Wind Farm Design
    Ashuri, T.
    Ponnurangam, C.
    Zhang, J.
    Rotea, M.
    SCIENCE OF MAKING TORQUE FROM WIND (TORQUE 2016), 2016, 753
  • [30] Study on offshore wind farm layout optimization based on decommissioning strategy
    Sun, Haiying
    Yang, Hongxing
    Gao, Xiaoxia
    LEVERAGING ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND POLICY OPTIONS FOR LOW CARBON CITIES, 2017, 143 : 566 - 571