Proficiency Testing for Monitoring Global Laboratory Performance and Identifying Discordance

被引:4
|
作者
Halim, Abdel-Baset [1 ]
机构
[1] Daiichi Sankyo Pharma Dev, Dept Clin Biomarkers, Edison, NJ 08837 USA
来源
LABMEDICINE | 2013年 / 44卷 / 01期
关键词
proficiency test; laboratory performance; discrepant laboratory results; patient management; pharmaceutical trials; biomarkers;
D O I
10.1309/LMTQ586TDYTAEOXO
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Although discrepant laboratory results still pose considerable risk to patients and to pharmaceutical development, overall clinical laboratory performance has improved with time due to significant efforts from lab professionals, diagnostic partners, and regulatory and accrediting agencies. These efforts include multiple internal and external laboratory quality control and quality assurance (QC/QA) measures. Proficiency testing (PT), provided by multiple agencies and led by the College of American Pathologists (CAP), currently serves as the main external QC/QA tool. In addition to its regulatory and educational aspects and its value as an efficient tool to monitor overall laboratory performance, this article will highlight the potential and crucial uses of PT. These uses include raising awareness among health care professionals about the serious problem of discrepancies in lab results between different methodologies or platforms, monitoring improvements in global lab performance, and expansion of the educational capacity of PT to end users in patient management and clinical trials, helping laboratorians and other health care professionals to correctly interpret biomarker data from different platforms.
引用
收藏
页码:E19 / E30
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ranking of Individual Laboratory Performance in Immunohistochemistry Proficiency Testing Using Digital Image Analysis
    Neufeld, H.
    Pilavdzic, D.
    Garratt, J.
    Gilks, B.
    Cheung, C.
    Ziola, B.
    Berendt, R.
    Krahn, J.
    Carlsen, S.
    Torlakovic, E.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2013, 26 : 479A - 480A
  • [32] COMPARISON OF LABORATORY PERFORMANCE WITH BLIND, ONSITE, AND MAIL-DISTRIBUTED PROFICIENCY TESTING SAMPLES
    HANSEN, HJ
    LEWIS, S
    BOONE, DJ
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 1979, 25 (06) : 1085 - 1085
  • [33] Proficiency testing for global solar collector certification
    Tong, Xiaochao
    Chang, Wenfang
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOLAR HEATING AND COOLING FOR BUILDINGS AND INDUSTRY, SHC 2014, 2015, 70 : 364 - 370
  • [34] Proficiency testing of therapeutic drug monitoring techniques
    Gochman, N
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2000, 46 (01) : 132 - 132
  • [35] Evaluating the Effectiveness of External Molecular Proficiency Testing in the Global Polio Laboratory Network, 2021-2022
    Gerloff, Nancy
    Burns, Cara C.
    PATHOGENS, 2024, 13 (11):
  • [36] EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE IN MICROBIOLOGY PROFICIENCY TESTING
    BLACK, WA
    DORSE, SE
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 1976, 67 (02): : 132 - 132
  • [37] Causes of unsatisfactory performance in proficiency testing
    Jenny, RW
    Jackson-Tarentino, KY
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2000, 46 (01) : 89 - 99
  • [38] Monitoring performance in South African parasitology proficiency testing programmes, 2003-2007
    Poonsamy, B.
    Dini, L.
    Frean, J.
    JOURNAL OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN VETERINARY ASSOCIATION, 2009, 80 (02) : 133 - 133
  • [40] Performance indication improvement for a proficiency testing
    D. Kisets
    Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2006, 10 : 461 - 465