Moxifloxacin monotherapy is effective in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia: The MOTIV study - A randomized clinical trial

被引:68
|
作者
Torres, Antoni [2 ]
Garau, Javier [3 ]
Arvis, Pierre
Carlet, Jean [4 ,5 ]
Choudhri, Shurjeel [6 ]
Kureishi, Amar [7 ]
Le Berre, Marie-Aude
Lode, Hartmut [8 ]
Winter, John [9 ]
Read, Robert C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sch Med, Sect Infect Immun & Inflammat, Sheffield S10 2RX, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Barcelona, Hosp Clin Barcelona, Inst Clin Torax, Serv Pneumol & Allergia Resp,Fac Med,Consorcio CI, E-08007 Barcelona, Spain
[3] Univ Barcelona, Hosp Mutua Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Fondat Hop St Joseph, Dept Infect Dis, Paris, France
[5] Fondat Hop St Joseph, Intens Care Unit, Paris, France
[6] Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceut, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Bayer HealthCare Co, Beijing, Peoples R China
[8] Charite, Inst Clin Pharmacol, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[9] Univ Dundee, Ninewells Hosp & Med Sch, Dept Med, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland
关键词
D O I
10.1086/587519
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. The aim of this study was to show that sequential intravenous and oral moxifloxacin monotherapy (400 mg once per day) is as efficacious and safe as a combination regimen (intravenous ceftriaxone, 2 g once per day, plus sequential intravenous and oral levofloxacin, 500 mg twice per day) in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. Methods. We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind noninferiority trial. Patients with a Pneumonia Severity Index ( PSI) of III-V were stratified on the basis of PSI risk class before randomization. The primary efficacy end point was clinical response at test of cure (4-14 days after the completion of treatment). Secondary efficacy end points were clinical and bacteriological response at end of treatment (days 7-14) and at follow-up assessment (21-28 days after the end of treatment), overall mortality, and mortality attributable to pneumonia. Results. Seven hundred thirty-three patients were enrolled in the study (368 in the moxifloxacin arm and 365 in the comparator arm); 49% had a PSI of IV, and 10% had a PSI of V. Of 569 patients (291 in the moxifloxacin arm and 278 in the comparator arm) valid for per-protocol analysis, the overall clinical cure rates at test of cure were 86.9% for moxifloxacin and 89.9% for the comparator regimen (95% confidence interval, -8.1% to 2.2%). Bacteriological success at test of cure was 83.3% for moxifloxacin and 85.1% for the comparator regimen (95% confidence interval, -15.4% to 11.8%). There were no significant differences between moxifloxacin and comparator treatments in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events or in mortality. Conclusions. Monotherapy with sequential intravenous/oral moxifloxacin was noninferior to treatment with ceftriaxone plus levofloxacin combination therapy in patients with community-acquired pneumonia who required hospitalization. Clinical trials registration. The MOxifloxacin Treatment IV Study is registered at NLM Clinical Trials ( registration number NCT00431678).
引用
收藏
页码:1499 / 1509
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Moxifloxacin monotherapy versus β-lactam mono- or combination therapy in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia
    Ewig, S.
    Hecker, H.
    Suttorp, N.
    Marre, R.
    Welte, T.
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2011, 62 (03) : 218 - 225
  • [2] Therapeutic efficacy of moxifloxacin in hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia
    De Benedetto, Fernando
    Del Ponte, Adriana
    Grassi, Carlo
    MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2010, 5 (06) : 422 - 431
  • [3] A randomized trial comparing the cardiac rhythm safety of moxifloxacin vs levofloxacin in elderly patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia
    Morganroth, J
    DiMarco, JP
    Anzueto, A
    Niederman, MS
    Choudhri, SJ
    CHEST, 2005, 128 (05) : 3398 - 3406
  • [4] A cost-minimization analysis comparing moxifloxacin versus levofloxacin and ceftriaxone for the treatment of patients hospitalized with Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Results from the MOTIV trial
    Lloyd, A. C.
    Holman, A. J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 (06) : A307 - A307
  • [5] Monotherapy versus dual therapy for community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients
    Martinez, FJ
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 38 : S328 - S340
  • [6] Clinical efficacy of intravenous followed by oral azithromycin monotherapy in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia
    Plouffe, J
    Schwartz, DB
    Kolokathis, A
    Sherman, BW
    Arnow, PM
    Gezon, JA
    Suh, B
    Anzuetto, A
    Greenberg, RN
    Niederman, M
    Paladino, JA
    Ramirez, JA
    Inverso, J
    Knirsch, CA
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2000, 44 (07) : 1796 - 1802
  • [7] Sequential intravenous to oral moxifloxacin monotherapy for community-acquired pneumonia.
    Fogarty, C
    Larsen, S
    Jackson, T
    Hamed, K
    Song, J
    Church, D
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2002, 22 (10): : 1349 - 1349
  • [8] Update Moxifloxacin in community-acquired Pneumonia
    Ewig, S.
    INFECTION, 2012, 40 : 10 - 10
  • [9] Moxifloxacin in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP)
    Welte, T.
    INFECTION, 2009, 37 : 7 - 8
  • [10] A randomized controlled trial of filgrastim as an adjunct to antibiotics for treatment of hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia
    Nelson, S
    Belknap, SM
    Carlson, RW
    Dale, D
    DeBoisblanc, B
    Farkas, S
    Fotheringham, N
    Ho, H
    Marrie, T
    Movahhed, H
    Root, R
    Wilson, J
    JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1998, 178 (04): : 1075 - 1080