A randomized trial comparing the cardiac rhythm safety of moxifloxacin vs levofloxacin in elderly patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia

被引:63
|
作者
Morganroth, J
DiMarco, JP
Anzueto, A
Niederman, MS
Choudhri, SJ
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Sch Med & eRes Technol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Charlottesville, VA USA
[3] Univ Texas San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78285 USA
[4] Winthrop Univ Hosp, Mineola, NY 11501 USA
[5] SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[6] Bayer Pharmaceut Corp, West Haven, CT USA
关键词
ambulatory ECG ECG monitoring; cardiac repolaration; cardiac safety; community-acquired pneumonia; elderly; levofloxacin; moxifloxacin; QTc interval;
D O I
10.1378/chest.128.5.3398
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Context: Antimicrobial cardiac safety is of particular concern during the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in elderly patients, due to the presence of comorbid conditions and the use of multiple medications that may individually or synergistically affect cardiac repolarization. Study objective: To assess the cardiac rhythm safety of moxifloxacin vs levofloxacin in elderly patients hospitalized with CAP. Design and setting: Prospective, randomized, double-blind trial conducted at 47 hospitals in the United states. Patients: Subjects : 65 years old with clinical signs/symptoms of CAP requiring initial parenteral therapy, including those with comorbidities. The safety population included 394 patients: 51.3% male; 85.3% white; mean age, 77.8 years. Two-thirds of the patients were > 75 years old, and 74.1% had a history of cardiac disease. Interventions: Patients received IV/oral moxifloxacin (400 mg qd) or IV/oral levofloxacin (500 mg qd) for 7 to 14 days. Safety evaluations included 72 h of digital continuous 12-lead Holter monitoring, 12-lead ECGs at baseline and at maximum serum concentration on day 3, and adverse events'. Main outcome measures: The primary safety end point was a composite of ventricular arrhythmia events based on Holter monitoring. Results: Holter monitor data were available for 387 patients (192 receiving moxilloxacin and 195 receiving levofloxacin). Sixteen moxifloxacin-treated patients (8.3%) and 10 levofloxacin-treated patients (5.1%) had a primary composite cardiac event (p = 0.29); most events were nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) [14 patients receiving moxifloxacin, 7.3%; and 10 patients receiving levofloxacin, 5.1%]. One moxifloxacin-treated patient had sustained monomorphic VT (> 30 S), and one levofloxacin-treated patient had torsade de pointes. Mean +/- SD QTc (Fridericia formula) change on day 3 was + 6.4 +/- 23.2 ms for moxilloxacin and - 2.5 +/- 22.9 ms for levofloxacin (p = 0.04). No deaths clearly related to study drugs occurred during the observation period. Conclusions: IV/oral moxifloxacin, although known to cause QTc interval prolongation, has a comparable cardiac rhythm safety profile to IV/oral levofloxacin in high-risk elderly patients with CAP.
引用
收藏
页码:3398 / 3406
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Moxifloxacin monotherapy is effective in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia: The MOTIV study - A randomized clinical trial
    Torres, Antoni
    Garau, Javier
    Arvis, Pierre
    Carlet, Jean
    Choudhri, Shurjeel
    Kureishi, Amar
    Le Berre, Marie-Aude
    Lode, Hartmut
    Winter, John
    Read, Robert C.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2008, 46 (10) : 1499 - 1509
  • [2] Efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin vs clarithromycin for community-acquired pneumonia
    Fogarty, C
    Grossman, C
    Williams, J
    Haverstock, D
    Church, D
    INFECTIONS IN MEDICINE, 1999, 16 (11) : 748 - +
  • [3] Community-acquired pneumonia recovery in the elderly (CAPRIE): Efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin therapy versus that of levofloxacin therapy
    Anzueto, A
    Niederman, MS
    Pearle, J
    Restrepo, MI
    Heyder, A
    Choudhri, SH
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2006, 42 (01) : 73 - 81
  • [4] Switch therapy in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia: Tigecycline vs. Levofloxacin
    Ramirez, Julio A.
    Cooper, Angel C.
    Wiemken, Timothy
    Gardiner, David
    Babinchak, Timothy
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2012, 12
  • [5] Switch therapy in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia: Tigecycline vs. Levofloxacin
    Julio A Ramirez
    Angel C Cooper
    Timothy Wiemken
    David Gardiner
    Timothy Babinchak
    BMC Infectious Diseases, 12
  • [6] A cost-minimization analysis comparing moxifloxacin versus levofloxacin and ceftriaxone for the treatment of patients hospitalized with Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Results from the MOTIV trial
    Lloyd, A. C.
    Holman, A. J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 (06) : A307 - A307
  • [7] Speed of recovery in adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia; moxifloxacin versus levofloxacin
    Al Ramahi, Jamal Wadi
    Ramadan, Mustafa
    Jaber, Waad
    Abushanab, Lamya
    Mughrabi, Mohammad
    Alshamayleh, Noor
    Mulhem, Ahmad
    Momani, Dania
    Obaidat, Mohammad
    Haddad, Ghayda
    Khali, Basma
    Zahran, Anas
    Odat, Esraa
    Kufoof, Nadeen
    Arabiat, Haneen
    Diab, Amr
    Anzueto, Antonio
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 2018, 12 (10): : 878 - 886
  • [8] Therapeutic efficacy of moxifloxacin in hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia
    De Benedetto, Fernando
    Del Ponte, Adriana
    Grassi, Carlo
    MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2010, 5 (06) : 422 - 431
  • [9] A comparison of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin use in hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients in the US: focus on length of stay
    Schein, Jeff
    Janagap-Benson, Carmela
    Grant, Richard
    Sikirica, Vanja
    Doshi, Dilesh
    Olson, William
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2008, 24 (03) : 895 - 906
  • [10] Lefamulin vs moxifloxacin for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia
    Tang, Hung-Jen
    Wang, Jui-Hsiang
    Lai, Chih-Cheng
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (29) : E21223