A Comparative Study on the Export Competitiveness of Rare Earth Products from China, the United States, Russia and India

被引:2
|
作者
Guo, Qing [1 ]
Mai, Zishan [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Foreign Studies, Sch Econ & Trade, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
关键词
rare earths; CMS model; WRCA index; export competitiveness; INDUSTRY; PROSPECTS; POLICIES;
D O I
10.3390/su141912358
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper evaluates and compares the export competitiveness of rare-earth products from China, the US, Russia, and India between 2006 and 2020 using the CMS model and the WRCA index. The results show that (1) the competitiveness of the four countries' rare-earth products has changed differently. The overall competitiveness of rare-earth products of China, the US, and India has decreased, whereas the competitiveness of Russia's rare-earth products has increased. (2) The factors inhibiting the development of the competitiveness of rare-earth products in the four countries are different. In China and India they are market factors and product factors, in the US it is the overall market share factor, and in Russia it is the market factor. (3) The competitiveness of rare-earth products varies greatly among the four countries. China has the highest rare-earth export competitiveness, whereas the US has significantly lower export competitiveness of rare-earth products than China. Russia and India do not have comparative advantages. (4) The four countries have different trends in the evolution of the competitiveness of rare-earth products. The export competitiveness of rare-earth products of China and India tends to decline, whereas that of the United States and Russia tends to rise. Based on the above findings, the paper puts forward corresponding policy recommendations.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Competitiveness of Colombian agricultural products under the free trade agreement with United States: comparative advantages analysis
    Stellian, Remi
    Paola Danna-Buitrago, Jenny
    CEPAL REVIEW, 2017, (122): : 139 - 163
  • [33] India, China, and the United States in Space: Partners, Competitors, Combatants? A Perspective From the United States
    Samson, Victoria
    INDIA REVIEW, 2011, 10 (04) : 422 - 439
  • [34] The United States' Export Promotion and Comparative Advantage in the Trade of Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Products: 1962-2018
    Hong, Yu
    Yu, Kexuan
    Yang, Yumeng
    Hu, Aijing
    Ma, Ping
    BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2020, 126 : 56 - 56
  • [35] A Comparative Study of Pioneer Entry Decisions in the United States and China
    Zhao, Y. Lisa
    Song, Michael
    Parry, Mark E.
    JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2014, 31 (05) : 987 - 1003
  • [36] A comparative study of the status of GSHP applications in the United States and China
    Liu, Xiaobing
    Lu, Shilei
    Hughes, Patrick
    Cai, Zhe
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 48 : 558 - 570
  • [37] A Comparative Study of Agile Manufacturing between China and the United States
    Sun, Yuan
    2019 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREEN POWER, MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS (GPMMTA 2019), 2019, 2185
  • [38] Unhappy and Happy Obesity: A Comparative Study on the United States and China
    Kazuma Sato
    Journal of Happiness Studies, 2021, 22 : 1259 - 1285
  • [39] Unhappy and Happy Obesity: A Comparative Study on the United States and China
    Sato, Kazuma
    JOURNAL OF HAPPINESS STUDIES, 2021, 22 (03) : 1259 - 1285
  • [40] A Comparative Study of Internet Addiction between the United States and China
    Zhang, Lixuan
    Amos, Clinton
    McDowell, William C.
    CYBERPSYCHOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2008, 11 (06): : 727 - 729