Comprehensive evaluation of microneedle-based intradermal adalimumab delivery vs. subcutaneous administration: results of a randomized controlled clinical trial

被引:18
|
作者
Jacobse, Justin [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ]
ten Voorde, Wouter [2 ,3 ]
Tandon, Anushka [2 ]
Romeijn, Stefan G. [3 ]
Grievink, Hendrika W. [2 ]
van der Maaden, Koen [3 ]
van Esdonk, Michiel J. [2 ]
Moes, Dirk Jan A. R. [5 ]
Loeff, Floris [4 ]
Bloem, Karien [4 ]
de Vries, Annick [4 ]
Rispens, Theo [4 ]
Wolbink, Gertjan [4 ]
de Kam, Marieke [2 ]
Ziagkos, Dimitrios [2 ]
Moerland, Matthijs [2 ]
Jiskoot, Wim [3 ]
Bouwstra, Joke [3 ]
Burggraaf, Jacobus [2 ,3 ]
Schrier, Lenneke [1 ,7 ]
Rissmann, Robert [2 ,3 ,5 ]
ten Cate, Rebecca [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Willem Alexander Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat Rheumatol, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Ctr Human Drug Res, Zernikedreef 8, NL-2333 CL Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Leiden Acad Ctr Drug Res, Div BioTherapeut, Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Sanquin Diagnost Serv, Biol Lab, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Pharm & Toxicol, Leiden, Netherlands
[6] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Pathol Microbiol & Immunol, 221 Kirkland Hall, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[7] Princess Maxima Ctr Pediat Oncol, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
adalimumab; intradermal; microneedle; pain; subcutaneous; SKIN COLOR; PAIN; TEMPERATURE; ABSORPTION; INJECTION; VACCINE; PHARMACOKINETICS; ANTIBODIES; INFUSION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1111/bcp.14729
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Aims To evaluate feasibility of intradermal (i.d.) adalimumab administration using hollow microneedles, and to compare a single i.d. dose of adalimumab using a hollow microneedle with a single subcutaneous (s.c.) dose using a conventional needle. Methods In this single-centre double-blind, placebo-controlled, double-dummy clinical trial in 24 healthy adults we compared 40 mg adalimumab (0.4 mL) administered i.d. using a hollow microneedle with a s.c. dose using a conventional needle. Primary parameters were pain, acceptability and local tolerability; secondary parameters safety, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity. We explored usability of optical coherence tomography, clinical photography, thermal imaging, and laser speckle contrast imaging to evaluate skin reaction after i.d. injections. In vitro protein analysis was performed to assess compatibility of adalimumab with the hollow microneedle device. Results While feasible and safe, injection pain of i.d. adalimumab was higher compared to s.c. adalimumab (35.4 vs. 7.9 on a 100-point visual analogue scale). Initial absorption rate and relative bioavailability were higher after i.d. adalimumab (time to maximum plasma concentration = 95 h [47-120]; F-rel = 129% [6.46%]) compared to s.c. adalimumab (time to maximum plasma concentration = 120 h [96-221]). Anti-adalimumab antibodies were detected in 50% and 83% of the subjects after i.d. and s.c. adalimumab, respectively. We observed statistically significantly more erythema and skin perfusion after i.d. adalimumab, compared to s.c. adalimumab and placebo injections (P < .0001). Cytokine secretion after whole blood lipopolysaccharide challenge was comparable between administration routes. Conclusions Intradermal injection of adalimumab using hollowing microneedles was perceived as more painful and less accepted than s.c. administration, but yields a higher relative bioavailability with similar safety and pharmacodynamic effects.
引用
收藏
页码:3162 / 3176
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Randomized Controlled Trial of High-Dose Intradermal vs. Standard Intramuscular Influenza Vaccine in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.
    Baluch, A.
    Humar, A.
    Egli, A.
    Hoschler, K.
    Campbell, P.
    Urschel, S.
    Wilson, L.
    Kumar, D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 12 : 53 - 54
  • [42] EFFECT OF TIME TO INTRAVENOUS THROMBOLYSIS ON CLINICAL OUTCOMES WITH TENECTEPLASE VS. ALTEPLASE: RESULTS FROM THE ACT PHASE 3 RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Singh, N.
    Bala, F.
    Almekhlafi, M.
    Buck, B.
    Ademola, A.
    Coutts, S.
    Deschaintre, Y.
    Khosravani, H.
    Appireddy, R.
    Francois, M.
    Phillips, S.
    Gubitz, G.
    Tkach, A.
    Catanese, L.
    Dowlatshahi, D.
    Medvedev, G.
    Mandzia, J.
    Aleksandra, P.
    Shankar, J. J.
    Williams, H.
    Field, T.
    Manosalva, H.
    Siddiqui, M.
    Zafar, A.
    Imoukhoude, O.
    Hunter, G.
    Sehgal, A.
    Zhang, Q.
    Doram, C.
    Hill, M.
    Shamy, M.
    Kenney, C.
    Sajobi, T.
    Swartz, R.
    Menon, B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2022, 17 (3_SUPPL) : 295 - 295
  • [43] Oral Analgesia in Fixed-Time Interval vs. OnDemand following Vaginal Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Bachar, Gal
    Justman, Naphtali
    Fater, Gili Buchnik
    Farago, Naama
    Ben David, Chen
    Abu-Rass, Hiba
    Siegler, Yoav
    Hajaj, Areen
    Zipori, Yaniv
    Khatib, Nizar
    Weiner, Zeev
    Vitner, Dana
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 230 (01) : S50 - S51
  • [44] Postplacental insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device after cesarean delivery vs. delayed insertion: a randomized controlled trial
    Whitaker, Amy K.
    Endres, Loraine K.
    Mistretta, Stephanie Q.
    Gilliam, Melissa L.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2014, 89 (06) : 534 - 539
  • [45] Preoperative intensive, community-based vs. traditional stoma education:: A randomized, controlled trial
    Chaudhri, S
    Brown, L
    Hassan, I
    Horgan, AF
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (03) : 504 - 509
  • [46] Subthreshold Micropulse Laser vs. Conventional Laser for Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Zhou, Lijun
    Lai, Kunbei
    Jin, Ling
    Huang, Chuangxin
    Xu, Fabao
    Gong, Yajun
    Li, Longhui
    Zhu, Zhe
    Lu, Lin
    Jin, Chenjin
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [47] Induction of ovulation with clomiphene vs. clomiphene with bromocriptine in PCOS patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial
    Zhang, Wei
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2016, 32 : 80 - 80
  • [48] Efficacy of topical clotrimazole vs. topical tolnaftate in the treatment of otomycosis. A randomized controlled clinical trial
    Jimenez-Garcia, Lesly
    Celis-Aguilar, Erika
    Diaz-Pavon, Gaudencio
    Munoz Estrada, Victor
    Castro-Urquizo, Angel
    Hernandez-Castillo, Nemiliztli
    Amaro-Flores, Ernesto
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2020, 86 (03) : 300 - 307
  • [49] Abdominal vs. transvaginal ultrasound guided embryo transfer preliminary results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Porat, N.
    Biaggio, B. E.
    Ansay, S. E.
    Boehnlein, L. M.
    Evans, M. D.
    Lindheim, S. R.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 88 : S28 - S28
  • [50] Clinical, radiographic, microbiological, and immunological outcomes of flapped vs. flapless dental implants: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial
    Tsoukaki, Marina
    Kalpidis, Christos D. R.
    Sakellari, Dimitra
    Tsalikis, Lazaros
    Mikrogiorgis, George
    Konstantinidis, Antonis
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2013, 24 (09) : 969 - 976