A Review on Unit Commitment Algorithms for the Italian Electricity Market

被引:7
|
作者
Falvo, Maria Carmen [1 ]
Panella, Stefano [1 ]
Caprabianca, Mauro [2 ]
Quaglia, Federico [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rome Sapienza, DIAEE Dept Astronaut Energy & Elect Engn, Via Eudossiana 18, I-00184 Rome, Italy
[2] TERNA, Viale Egidio Galbani 70, I-00056 Rome, Italy
关键词
alternating current optimal power flow (ACOPF); unit commitment (UC); optimal power flow (OPF); mixed integer nonlinear programming (MINLP); direct current optimal power flow (DCOPF); security constrained unit commitment (SCUC); ancillary service market (ASM); transmission system operator (TSO); OPTIMAL POWER-FLOW; CONSTRAINED OPF; SECURITY; UNCERTAINTY; OPTIMIZATION; DEMAND;
D O I
10.3390/en15010018
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This paper focuses on the state-of-the-art of unit commitment (UC) and economic dispatch (ED) algorithms suitable for the Italian electricity market. In view of the spread of renewable energy systems (RES), the desired UC algorithm should be able to properly consider the uncertainty affecting key input variables into the formulation of the problem, as well as the different capabilities of dispatched power plants to provide ancillary services (e.g., voltage regulation). The goal of this paper is to resume the developments in UC and ED algorithms which occurred in the last decades, having a particular focus on alternating current (AC) security constrained (SC) approaches and stochastic ones, highlighting the advantages and weakness of each technique. This review is useful for the Italian TSO (Terna) to investigate what is the best solution to formulate a new algorithm to be potentially adopted in the framework of the Italian Ancillary Service Market, striving for an explicit modelization of stochastic variables and voltage constraints. This review is also useful to all system operators (SOs), independently to the market environment in which they operate, because UC algorithms are widely adopted to ensure real-time security of power systems. In conclusion, an SC-UC algorithm which takes into account both stochastic variables and AC formulation does not exist.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Volatility of unit commitment in competitive electricity markets
    Oren, SS
    Svoboda, AJ
    Johnson, RB
    THIRTIETH HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES, VOL 5: ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY, 1997, : 594 - 601
  • [32] Evolutionary Algorithms for the Unit Commitment Problem
    Uyar, A. Sima
    Tuerkay, Belgin
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2008, 16 (03) : 239 - 255
  • [33] Ramsey prices in the Italian electricity market
    Bigerna, Simona
    Bollino, Carlo Andrea
    ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 88 : 603 - 612
  • [34] Electricity Demand in Wholesale Italian Market
    Bigerna, Simona
    Bollino, Carlo Andrea
    ENERGY JOURNAL, 2014, 35 (03): : 25 - 46
  • [35] Demand market power and renewables in the Italian electricity market
    Bigerna, Simona
    Bollino, Carlo Andrea
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 55 : 1154 - 1162
  • [36] Measuring the impact of market coupling on the Italian electricity market
    Pellini, Elisabetta
    ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 48 : 322 - 333
  • [37] Renewable Energy and Market Power in the Italian Electricity Market
    Bigerna, Simona
    Bollino, Carlo Andrea
    Polinori, Paolo
    ENERGY JOURNAL, 2016, 37 : 123 - 144
  • [38] Market Power and Transmission Congestion in the Italian Electricity Market
    Bigerna, Simona
    Bollino, Carlo Andrea
    Polinori, Paolo
    ENERGY JOURNAL, 2016, 37 (02): : 133 - 154
  • [39] Unit commitment optimisation of hydro-thermal power systems in the day-ahead electricity market
    Bello, S. A.
    Akorede, M. F.
    Pouresmaeil, E.
    Ibrahim, O.
    COGENT ENGINEERING, 2016, 3 (01):
  • [40] A unit commitment and economic dispatch model of the GB electricity market - Formulation and application to hydro pumped storage
    Chyong, Chi Kong
    Newbery, David
    ENERGY POLICY, 2022, 170