Electric field determination in streamer discharges in air at atmospheric pressure

被引:72
|
作者
Bonaventura, Z. [1 ,2 ]
Bourdon, A. [1 ]
Celestin, S. [3 ]
Pasko, V. P. [3 ]
机构
[1] CNRS, EM2C Lab, Ecole Cent Paris, UPR 288, F-92295 Chatenay Malabry, France
[2] Masaryk Univ, Dept Phys Elect, Fac Sci, CS-61137 Brno, Czech Republic
[3] Penn State Univ, Commun & Space Sci Lab, Dept Elect Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
来源
PLASMA SOURCES SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY | 2011年 / 20卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
PHOTOIONIZATION; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1088/0963-0252/20/3/035012
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
The electric field in streamer discharges in air can be easily determined by the ratio of luminous intensities emitted by N(2)(C(3) Pi(u)) and N(2)(+) (B(2) Sigma(+)(u)) if the steady-state assumption of the emitting states is fully justified. At ground pressure, the steady-state condition is not fulfilled and it is demonstrated that its direct use to determine the local and instantaneous peak electric field in the streamer head may overestimate this field by a factor of 2. However, when spatial and time-integrated optical emissions (OEs) are considered, the reported results show that it is possible to formulate a correction factor in the framework of the steady-state approximation and to accurately determine the peak electric field in an air discharge at atmospheric pressure. A correction factor is defined as Gamma = E(s)/ E(e), where E(e) is the estimated electric field and E(s) is the true peak electric field in the streamer head. It is shown that this correction stems from (i) the shift between the location of the peak electric field and the maximum excitation rate for N(2)(C(3) Pi(u)) and N(2)(+) (B(2) Sigma(+)(u)) as proposed by Naidis (2009 Phys. Rev. E 79 057401) and (ii) from the cylindrical geometry of the streamers as stated by Celestin and Pasko (2010 Geophys. Res. Lett. 37 L07804). For instantaneous OEs integrated over the whole radiating plasma volume, a correction factor of Gamma similar to 1.4 has to be used. For time-integrated OEs, the reported results show that the ratio of intensities can be used to derive the electric field in discharges if the time of integration is sufficiently long (i.e. at least longer than the longest characteristic lifetime of excited species) to have the time to collect all the light from the emitting zones of the streamer. For OEs recorded using slits (i.e. a window with a small width but a sufficiently large radial extension to contain the total radial extension of the discharge) the calculated correction factor is Gamma similar to 1.4. As for OEs observed through pinholes, the reported results demonstrate that for local OEs, the Gamma coefficient depends slightly on the radial position and is in a range [1.24, 1.28]. For line-integrated OEs, the radial variation of Gamma is more significant and Gamma is in the range [1.24, 1.38]. Finally, it is noted that the use of different sets of Einstein coefficients and quenching rates of excited states has negligible influence on the value of Gamma.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Electric Field in a Positive Streamer in Long Air Gaps
    Bazelyan, E. M.
    Aleksandrov, N. L.
    PLASMA PHYSICS REPORTS, 2022, 48 (07) : 789 - 797
  • [32] Filamentary streamer discharges in argon at atmospheric pressure excited by surface plasmon polaritons
    Chen, Zhaoquan
    Xia, Guangqing
    Zhou, Qiyan
    Hu, Yelin
    Zheng, Xiaoliang
    Zheng, Zhen
    Hong, Lingli
    Li, Ping
    Huang, Yourui
    Liu, Minghai
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 2012, 83 (08):
  • [33] A numerical model of streamer breakdown in air gap at atmospheric pressure
    Tanthanuch N.
    Petcharaks K.
    IEEJ Transactions on Power and Energy, 2010, 130 (12) : 1119 - 1124+10
  • [34] Simulation of long-streamer propagation in air at atmospheric pressure
    Aleksandrov, NL
    Bazelyan, EM
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 1996, 29 (03) : 740 - 752
  • [35] Three-Dimensional Streamer Modeling in Atmospheric Pressure Air
    Papageorgiou, L.
    Metaxas, A. C.
    Georghiou, G. E.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PLASMA SCIENCE, 2011, 39 (11) : 2224 - 2225
  • [36] Surface Electric Field for Negative Corona Discharge in Atmospheric Pressure Air
    Zheng, Yuesheng
    He, Jinliang
    Zhang, Bo
    Zeng, Rong
    Yu, Zhanqing
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PLASMA SCIENCE, 2011, 39 (08) : 1644 - 1651
  • [37] Interrelations between the atmospheric electric field, air pressure, and hydrogeological processes
    V. N. Shuleikin
    G. G. Shchukin
    Russian Meteorology and Hydrology, 2017, 42 : 19 - 26
  • [38] Electric field breakdown at micrometre separations in air and nitrogen at atmospheric pressure
    Dhariwal, RS
    Torres, JM
    Desmulliez, MPY
    IEE PROCEEDINGS-SCIENCE MEASUREMENT AND TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 147 (05) : 261 - 265
  • [39] Nonequilibrium effects in the plasma of hot air at atmospheric pressure in electric field
    Aleksandrov, NL
    Bazelyan, EM
    Kochetov, IV
    Novitskii, GA
    HIGH TEMPERATURE, 1998, 36 (06) : 966 - 968
  • [40] Interrelations between the Atmospheric Electric Field, Air Pressure, and Hydrogeological Processes
    Shuleikin, V. N.
    Shchukin, G. G.
    RUSSIAN METEOROLOGY AND HYDROLOGY, 2017, 42 (01) : 19 - 26