Classification, diagnosis, and differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis

被引:204
|
作者
Sand, Ilana Katz [1 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Neurol, Corinne Goldsmith Dickinson Ctr Multiple Sclerosi, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
classification; diagnosis; differential diagnosis; multiple sclerosis; phenotype; CLINICALLY ISOLATED SYNDROME; NEUROMYELITIS-OPTICA; FOLLOW-UP; PREDICT CONVERSION; BRAIN ATROPHY; MRI CRITERIA; DOUBLE-BLIND; SPINAL-CORD; DISABILITY; NEURITIS;
D O I
10.1097/WCO.0000000000000206
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose of reviewThe increasing availability of effective therapies for multiple sclerosis as well as research demonstrating the benefits of early treatment highlights the importance of expedient and accurate multiple sclerosis diagnosis. This review will discuss the classification, diagnosis, and differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.Recent findingsAn international panel of multiple sclerosis experts, the MS Phenotype Group, recently revised the multiple sclerosis phenotypic classifications and published their recommendations in 2014. Recent research developments have helped improve the accuracy of multiple sclerosis diagnosis, especially with regard to differentiating multiple sclerosis from neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders.SummaryCurrent multiple sclerosis phenotypic classifications include relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, clinically isolated syndrome, radiologically isolated syndrome, primary-progressive multiple sclerosis, and secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis. The McDonald 2010 diagnostic criteria provide formal guidelines for the diagnosis of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and primary-progressive multiple sclerosis. These require demonstration of dissemination in space and time, with consideration given to both clinical findings and imaging data. The criteria also require that there exist no better explanation for the patient's presentation. The clinical history, examination, and MRI should be most consistent with multiple sclerosis, including the presence of features typical for the disease as well as the absence of features that suggest an alternative cause, for a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis to be proposed.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 205
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Vertigo and multiple sclerosis: aspects of differential diagnosis
    D. Alpini
    D. Caputo
    L. Pugnetti
    D. A. Giuliano
    A. Cesarani
    Neurological Sciences, 2001, 22 : S84 - S87
  • [22] The differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis and bipolar disorder
    Young, CR
    Weiss, EL
    Bowers, MB
    Mazure, CM
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1997, 58 (03) : 123 - 123
  • [23] Differential Diagnosis in Late Onset Multiple Sclerosis
    Yorio, Florencia
    Marrodan, Mariano
    Farez, Mauricio
    Correale, Jorge
    NEUROLOGY, 2019, 92 (15)
  • [24] Guidelines for differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis
    Palace, Jacqueline
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE NEUROLOGY, 2009, 5 (03): : 134 - 135
  • [25] Vertigo and multiple sclerosis: aspects of differential diagnosis
    Alpini, D
    Caputo, D
    Pugnetti, L
    Giuliano, DA
    Cesarani, A
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2001, 22 (Suppl 2) : S84 - S87
  • [26] Differential diagnosis and evaluation in pediatric multiple sclerosis
    Hahn, Jin S.
    Pohl, Daniela
    Rensel, Mary
    Rao, Sanjai
    NEUROLOGY, 2007, 68 : S13 - S22
  • [27] MRI differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis
    Chen, J. J.
    Carletti, E.
    Young, V.
    Mckean, D.
    Quaghebeur, G.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 71 (09) : 815 - 827
  • [28] Guidelines for differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis
    Jacqueline Palace
    Nature Reviews Neurology, 2009, 5 : 134 - 135
  • [29] A Clinical Approach to the Differential Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis
    Michel Toledano
    Brian G. Weinshenker
    Andrew J. Solomon
    Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 2015, 15
  • [30] The contribution of spinal cord MRI to the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis
    Simon, JH
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2000, 172 : S32 - S35