Accuracy of anterior nasal swab rapid antigen tests compared with RT-PCR for massive SARS-CoV-2 screening in low prevalence population

被引:9
|
作者
Jakobsen, Kathrine Kronberg [1 ]
Jensen, Jakob Schmidt [1 ]
Todsen, Tobias [1 ,2 ]
Kirkby, Nikolai [3 ]
Lippert, Freddy [4 ]
Vangsted, Anne-Marie [5 ]
Klokker, Mads [1 ]
von Buchwald, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg & Audiol, Inge Lehmanns Vej 8, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Copenhagen Acad Med Educ & Simulat, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, Dept Clin Microbiol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Copenhagen Emergency Med Serv, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Testctr Danmark, Statens Serum Inst, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; diagnostic testing; rapid antigen test;
D O I
10.1111/apm.13189
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
The aim was to determine the accuracy of anterior nasal swab in rapid antigen (Ag) tests in a low SARS-CoV-2 prevalence and massive screened community. Individuals, aged 18 years or older, who self-booked an appointment for real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test in March 2021 at a public test center in Copenhagen, Denmark were included. An oropharyngeal swab was collected for RT-PCR testing, followed by a swab from the anterior parts of the nose examined by Ag test (SD Biosensor). Accuracy of the Ag test was calculated with RT-PCR as reference. We included 7074 paired conclusive tests (n = 3461, female: 50.7%). The median age was 48 years (IQR: 36-57 years). The prevalence was 0.9%, that is, 66 tests were positive on RT-PCR. Thirty-two had a paired positive Ag test. The sensitivity was 48.5% and the specificity was 100%. This study conducted in a low prevalence setting in a massive screening set-up showed that the Ag test had a sensitivity of 48.5% and a specificity of 100%, that is, no false positive tests. The lower sensitivity is a challenge especially if Ag testing is not repeated frequently allowing this scalable test to be a robust supplement to RT-PCR testing in an ambitious public SARS-CoV-2 screening.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 100
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of the SARS-CoV-2 Rapid antigen test to the real star Sars-CoV-2 RT PCR kit
    Kruettgen, Alexander
    Cornelissen, Christian G.
    Dreher, Michael
    Hornef, Mathias W.
    Imoehl, Matthias
    Kleines, Michael
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2021, 288
  • [32] A comparison of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen testing with realtime RT-PCR among symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals
    Jyotsnamayee Sabat
    Subhra Subhadra
    Sonalika Rath
    Lal Mohan Ho
    Tanushree Satpathy
    Dipankar Pattnaik
    Sanghamitra Pati
    Jyotirmayee Turuk
    BMC Infectious Diseases, 23
  • [33] A comparison of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen testing with realtime RT-PCR among symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals
    Sabat, Jyotsnamayee
    Subhadra, Subhra
    Rath, Sonalika
    Ho, Lal Mohan
    Satpathy, Tanushree
    Pattnaik, Dipankar
    Pati, Sanghamitra
    Turuk, Jyotirmayee
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [34] Comparison Between GenBody COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Kit and SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR
    Yi, Tae Hyeon
    Lee, Jong Ho
    CLINICAL LABORATORY, 2022, 68 (06) : 1291 - 1293
  • [35] Evaluating diagnostic accuracy of an RT-PCR test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva
    Samsunder, Natasha
    Sivro, Aida
    Hassan-Moosa, Razia
    Lewis, Lara
    Kara, Zahra
    Baxter, Cheryl
    Karim, Quarraisha Abdool
    Karim, Salim Abdool
    Kharsany, Ayesha B. M.
    Naidoo, Kogieleum
    Ngcapu, Sinaye
    DIAGNOSTIC AND PROGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2024, 8 (01)
  • [36] Diagnostic Performance and Tolerability of Saliva and Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens in the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR
    Ahti, Jaakko
    Osterback, Riikka
    Keskitalo, Anniina
    Mokkala, Kati
    Vidback, Siina
    Veikkolainen, Ville
    Vuorinen, Tytti
    Peltola, Ville
    Hakanen, Antti J.
    Waris, Matti
    Laine, Miia
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2023, 11 (03)
  • [37] Value of swab types and collection time on SARS-COV-2 detection using RT-PCR assay
    Liu, Min
    Li, Qianyuan
    Zhou, Jun
    Ai, Wen
    Zheng, Xiaoling
    Zeng, Jingjing
    Liu, Yuwen
    Xiang, Xiying
    Guo, Rong
    Li, Xiaoyin
    Wu, Xiandi
    Xu, Haiying
    Jiang, Ling
    Zhang, Huaqin
    Chen, Jing
    Tian, Lili
    Luo, Jun
    Luo, Chunhua
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2020, 286
  • [38] Effect of swab pooling on the Accula point-of-care RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 detection
    Lancelot, Moira
    Fibben, Kirby
    Sullivan, Julie
    O'Sick, William
    McLendon, Kaleb
    Wu, Huixia
    Rao, Anuradha
    Bassit, Leda C.
    Greenleaf, Morgan
    Miller, Pamela
    Krull, Wolfgang
    Tyburski, Erika
    Roback, John D.
    Lam, Wilbur A.
    Damhorst, Gregory L.
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [39] Comparison of RT-PCR, RT-LAMP, and Antigen Quantification Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Tanimoto, Yoshihiko
    Mori, Ai
    Miyamoto, Sonoko
    Ito, Erika
    Arikawa, Kentaro
    Iwamoto, Tomotada
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 75 (03) : 249 - 253
  • [40] Extraction-Free Rapid Cycle Quantitative RT-PCR and Extreme RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Virus Detection
    Lownik, Joseph C.
    Way, Grayson W.
    Farrar, Jared S.
    Martin, Rebecca K.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 23 (12): : 1671 - 1679