Health anxiety and cognitive interference: Evidence from the application of a modified Stroop task in two studies

被引:31
|
作者
Karademas, Evangelos C. [1 ]
Christopoulou, Stavroula [1 ]
Dimostheni, Anna [1 ]
Pavlu, Fotini [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Crete, Dept Psychol, Rethimnon 74100, Greece
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
health anxiety; perceived symptoms; information processing; Stroop task;
D O I
10.1016/j.paid.2007.11.007
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The number of studies using a modified Stroop task in the examination of health anxiety-related cognitive biases is limited, and their results are divergent. The use of research methods that preclude conscious processes is, however, essential. The purpose of the present two studies was to examine whether health anxiety is associated with information processing biases towards illness-related stimuli, as well as whether health anxiety interacts with perceived physical symptoms regarding such biases. In both studies a modified Stroop task was implemented. Fifty-one healthy university students in the first study, and 69 in the second study completed a modified Stroop task and filled out questionnaires regarding mood, state anxiety, health anxiety and perceived symptoms. According to the results of both studies, after controlling for positive and negative mood and state anxiety, individuals with higher levels of health anxiety displayed greater information biases towards illness-related words. Moreover, health anxiety did not interact with perceived physical symptoms, as shown in the second study. The implications of these findings are significant, not only as far as health anxiety is concerned, but also for everyday health-related behaviour. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1138 / 1150
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Validation of a modified Stroop task for fMRI studies in patients with schizophrenia
    Antonius, D
    Nolan, KA
    Weiss, EM
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2003, 60 (01) : 122 - 122
  • [32] The Modified Stroop Task Is Susceptible to Feigning: Stroop Performance and Symptom Over-endorsement in Feigned Test Anxiety
    Boskovic, Irena
    Biermans, Anita J.
    Merten, Thomas
    Jelicic, Marko
    Hope, Lorraine
    Merckelbach, Harald
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [33] Evidence for Two Types of Task Conflict in a Color-Digit Stroop Task
    Hershman, Ronen
    Keha, Eldad
    Sapir, Ayelet
    Weiss, Elisabeth m.
    Henik, Avishai
    Kaufmann, Liane
    JOURNAL OF COGNITION, 2024, 7 (01):
  • [34] Stroop interference in a delayed match-to-sample task: evidence for semantic competition
    Sturz, Bradley R.
    Green, Marshall L.
    Locker, Lawrence, Jr.
    Boyer, Ty W.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 4
  • [35] The Roles of Sensory Function and Cognitive Load in Age Differences in Inhibition: Evidence From the Stroop Task
    Peng, Huamao
    Gao, Yue
    Mao, Xiaofei
    PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2017, 32 (01) : 42 - 50
  • [36] Do innocent victims threaten the belief in a just world? Evidence from a modified stroop task
    Hafer, CL
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 79 (02) : 165 - 173
  • [37] Interference with Processing Negative Stimuli in Problematic Internet Users: Preliminary Evidence from an Emotional Stroop Task
    Schimmenti, Adriano
    Starcevic, Vladan
    Gervasi, Alessia M.
    Deleuze, Jory
    Billieux, Joel
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2018, 7 (07)
  • [38] Assessing Cognitive Interference Using the Emotional Stroop Task in Students with and Without Attention Problems
    Sideridis, Georgios D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2009, 25 (02) : 99 - 106
  • [39] Animacy and attentional processes: Evidence from the Stroop task
    Bugaiska, Aurelia
    Gregoire, Laurent
    Camblats, Anna-Malika
    Gelin, Margaux
    Meot, Alain
    Bonin, Patrick
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 72 (04): : 882 - 889
  • [40] The Cancer Stroop Task as an Implicit Measure of Cognitive Interference in Head and Neck Cancer Patients
    Milbury, K.
    Badr, H.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2011, 20 (04) : 717 - 717