The Development and Evaluation of Personalized Training in Shared Decision-making Skills for Rheumatologists

被引:4
|
作者
Mahmood, Sehrash [1 ]
Hazes, Johanna M. W. [2 ]
Veldt, Petra [3 ]
van Riel, Piet [4 ]
Landewe, Robert [1 ]
Moens, Hein Bernelot [5 ]
Pasma, Annelieke [2 ]
机构
[1] Amsterdam Rheumatol & Immunol Ctr, De Boelelaan 1117,Room 3A56, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Rheumatol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Dept Rheumatol, Delft, Netherlands
[4] Radhoud Univ, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, IQ Healthcare, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Ziekenhuis Grp Twente, Dept Rheumatol, Almelo, Netherlands
关键词
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICIAN PRACTICE PATTERNS; RHEUMATIC DISEASES; COMMUNICATION; SATISFACTION; PERCEPTIONS; MANAGEMENT; ADHERENCE; CARE;
D O I
10.3899/jrheum.180780
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. Many factors influence a patient's preference in engaging in shared decision making (SDM). Several training programs have been developed for teaching SDM to physicians, but none of them focused on the patients' preferences. We developed an SDM training program for rheumatologists with a specific focus on patients' preferences and assessed its effects. Methods. A training program was developed, pilot tested, and given to 30 rheumatologists. Immediately after the training and 10 weeks later, rheumatologists were asked to complete a questionnaire to evaluate the training. Patients were asked before and after the training to complete a questionnaire on patient satisfaction. Results. Ten weeks after the training, 57% of the rheumatologists felt they were capable of estimating the need of patients to engage in SDM, 62% felt their communication skills had improved, and 33% reported they engaged more in SDM. Up to 268 patients were included. Overall, patient satisfaction was high, but there were no statistically significant differences in patient satisfaction before and after the training. Conclusion. The training was received well by the participating rheumatologists. Even in a population of rheumatologists that communicates well, 62% reported improvement. The training program increased awareness about the principles of SDM in patients and physicians, and improved physicians' communicative skills, but did not lead to further improvement in patients' satisfaction, which was already high.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 297
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Shared decision-making in HCM
    Barry J. Maron
    Rick A. Nishimura
    Martin S. Maron
    Nature Reviews Cardiology, 2017, 14 : 125 - 126
  • [42] Shared decision making and determining decision-making capacity
    Brody, H
    PRIMARY CARE, 2005, 32 (03): : 645 - +
  • [43] Focus on shared decision-making
    Chew-Graham, Carolyn A.
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2017, 20 (06) : 1181 - 1182
  • [44] Futility and Shared Decision-Making
    Rubin, Michael A.
    Riecke, Jenny
    Heitman, Elizabeth
    NEUROLOGIC CLINICS, 2023, 41 (03) : 455 - 467
  • [45] The Importance of Shared Decision-Making
    Lichtstein, Daniel M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2022, 135 (06):
  • [46] The Shared Decision-Making Continuum
    Kon, Alexander A.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 304 (08): : 903 - 904
  • [47] Shared decision-making in question
    Charavel, M
    Bremond, A
    Moumjid-Ferdjaoui, N
    Mignotte, H
    Carrere, MO
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2001, 10 (02) : 93 - 102
  • [48] Shared Decision-Making in Pediatrics
    Sawyer, Kimberly E.
    Opel, Douglas J.
    PEDIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 71 (01) : 39 - 48
  • [49] Shared Decision-Making in Prosthodontics
    Sailer, Irena
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2020, 33 (06) : 597 - 598
  • [50] Shared decision-making in HCM
    Maron, Barry J.
    Nishimura, Rick A.
    Maron, Martin S.
    NATURE REVIEWS CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 14 (03) : 125 - 126