Integrating Social and Ecological Knowledge for Targeting Voluntary Biodiversity Conservation

被引:40
|
作者
Paloniemi, Riikka [1 ]
Hujala, Teppo [2 ,3 ]
Rantala, Salla [1 ]
Harlio, Annika [4 ]
Salomaa, Anna [5 ]
Primmer, Eeva [1 ]
Pynnonen, Sari [6 ]
Arponen, Anni [4 ]
机构
[1] Finnish Environm Inst SYKE, Environm Policy Ctr, POB 140, FIN-00251 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Nat Resources Inst Finland Luke, Biobased Business & Ind, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Eastern Finland UEF, Sch Forest Sci, Joensuu, Finland
[4] Univ Helsinki, Metapopulat Res Ctr, Dept Biosci, Helsinki, Finland
[5] Univ Helsinki, Dept Environm Sci, Helsinki, Finland
[6] Cent Union Agr Producers & Forest Owners MTK, Helsinki, Finland
来源
CONSERVATION LETTERS | 2018年 / 11卷 / 01期
关键词
Conservation targeting; dialogue; landowner; prioritization; survey; voluntary conservation; Zonation software; PRIVATE LANDS; PROTECTION; FORESTS; WILLINGNESS; EXPANSION;
D O I
10.1111/conl.12340
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Improving the effectiveness of voluntary biodiversity policies requires developing trans-disciplinary conservation plans that consider social constraints to achieving ecological objectives. We integrated data on landowners' willingness to participate in voluntary conservation efforts with ecological data on conservation values in a spatial prioritization, and found that doing so considerably reduced the loss in conservation value caused by landowners' reluctance to participate. We learned that conducting prioritization with stakeholder input gained through dialogue during field visits could be beneficial for increasing the legitimacy of conservation plans with stakeholders. Thus, in addition to developing a methodology for using data on stakeholder perceptions of conservation in spatial prioritization, our study suggests that engaging landowners and other stakeholders in the conservation prioritization process will improve the success of conservation plans.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A collaborative GIS method for integrating local and technical knowledge in establishing biodiversity conservation priorities
    Balram, S
    Suzana, DE
    Dragicevic, S
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2004, 13 (06) : 1195 - 1208
  • [32] Ecological and social challenges to biodiversity conservation on farmland: reconnecting habitats on a landscape scale
    Dutton, Adam
    Edwards-Jones, Gareth
    Strachan, Robert
    Macdonald, David W.
    MAMMAL REVIEW, 2008, 38 (2-3) : 205 - 219
  • [33] Characterizing social-ecological units to inform biodiversity conservation in cultural landscapes
    Hanspach, Jan
    Loos, Jacqueline
    Dorresteijn, Ine
    Abson, David J.
    Fischer, Joern
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2016, 22 (08) : 853 - 864
  • [34] Integrating Ecological and Ethnobotanical Knowledge to Promote Collaborative Conservation Planning in the Nepal Himalaya
    Shrestha, Sushma
    Medley, Kimberly E.
    MOUNTAIN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 37 (01) : 97 - 107
  • [35] The role, use of and requirement for traditional ecological knowledge in bioprospecting and biobanking biodiversity conservation schemes
    Chapman, Tamzyn
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING LAW JOURNAL, 2008, 25 (03):
  • [36] Biodiversity conservation, human-animal interactions, and zootherapy in ecological knowledge of Indonesian Healers
    Patrick, Patricia G.
    Rahman, Abdul
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2024, 38 (04)
  • [38] Integrating evolutionary patterns in biodiversity science and conservation
    Forest, F.
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2017, 109 : 323 - 323
  • [39] Integrating biodiversity and conservation with modern agricultural landscapes
    S. Kumaraswamy
    K. Kunte
    Biodiversity and Conservation, 2013, 22 : 2735 - 2750
  • [40] Integrating Proximal and Horizon Threats to Biodiversity for Conservation
    Bonebrake, Timothy C.
    Guo, Fengyi
    Dingle, Caroline
    Baker, David M.
    Kitching, Roger L.
    Ashton, Louise A.
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2019, 34 (09) : 781 - 788