Societal risk acceptance criteria of the global general cargo ships

被引:5
|
作者
Wang, Jinhui [1 ]
Zhou, Yu [1 ]
Zhang, Shaogang [1 ]
Zhuang, Lei [2 ]
Shi, Long [3 ]
Chen, Jihong [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Hu, Daoxian [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Maritime Univ, Coll Ocean Sci & Engn, Shanghai 201306, Peoples R China
[2] China Classificat Soc, Shanghai Rules & Res Inst, Shanghai 200135, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Sci & Technol China, State Key Lab Fire Sci, Hefei 232001, Peoples R China
[4] Shenzhen Univ, Coll Management, Shenzhen 518071, Peoples R China
[5] Shenzhen Int Maritime Inst, Shenzhen 518081, Peoples R China
[6] Hyde Guangzhou Int Logist Grp Co LTD, Guangzhou 510665, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
General cargo ship; Risk acceptance criteria; Societal risk; F-N curve; ALARP principle; FORMAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT; EXPLOSION ACCIDENTS; OIL; COLLISION; MODEL; FIRE;
D O I
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112162
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
The societal risk acceptance criteria (SRAC) are used in the shipping industry as a ruler to judge whether the actual ship risk is in control. To exploringly refresh SRAC for general cargo ship formulated by International Maritime Organization (IMO) in 2000, a comprehensive analysis was performed by using the accident data recorded in the Marine Casualties and Incidents (MCI) module of the Global Integrated Shipping Information System (GISIS) database from 2005 to 2019. The risk levels of four typical accident factors, including initial event, ship size, classification society, and geographical zone, were evaluated. The results illustrate that the SRAC established in this study for general cargo ship fatality accidents are found stricter than that by IMO presented in 2000. Fire/explosion and capsizing show the highest societal risk levels in the initial events, and large general cargo ships face higher societal risk. In addition, ships that do not belong to the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS) are at a higher risk than IACS ships. And the societal risk levels of fatality accidents in East & Southeast Asia and injury accidents in Europe, the Mediterranean & Black Sea are higher than those in the other zones.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Risk acceptance criteria for temporary phases
    Vinnem, JE
    JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1996, 118 (03): : 204 - 209
  • [32] Study of risk acceptance criteria for dams
    LI ShouYi
    ZHOU XingBo
    WANG YuJie
    ZHOU JianPing
    DU XiaoHu
    CHEN ZuYu
    Science China(Technological Sciences), 2015, (07) : 1263 - 1271
  • [33] ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR WELD DEFECTS AND NONDESTRUCTIVE INSPECTION PROCEDURES FOR LNG TANKS IN SHIPS
    TENGE, P
    SOLLI, O
    FORLI, O
    METAL CONSTRUCTION, 1975, 7 (01): : 29 - 34
  • [34] Influence of the required EEDI reduction factor application on general cargo ships GHG emissions
    Ancic, I
    Sestan, A.
    Vladimir, N.
    TOWARDS GREEN MARINE TECHNOLOGY AND TRANSPORT, 2015, : 777 - 782
  • [35] Development of Risk Acceptance Criteria for Indian Railways
    Malviya, Ashwin
    Singh, Vishal Kumar
    Yadav, Bikarama Prasad
    ADVANCES IN FIRE AND PROCESS SAFETY, 2018, : 91 - 102
  • [36] Ethics and fundamental principles of risk acceptance criteria
    Vanem, Erik
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2012, 50 (04) : 958 - 967
  • [37] On the ethical justification for the use of risk acceptance criteria
    Aven, Terje
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2007, 27 (02) : 303 - 312
  • [38] STRENGTHENING THE NONPROLIFERATION REGIME WITH RISK ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
    d'Oro, Edoardo Cavalieri
    Golay, Michael W.
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 179 (01) : 117 - 128
  • [39] New risk acceptance criteria for process safety
    Moseman, James
    PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2012, 31 (01) : 6 - 8
  • [40] Research on Risk Acceptance Criteria of Railway System
    Zhang Ya-dong
    Guo Jin
    Xiao Nv-e
    EBM 2010: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-8, 2010, : 4103 - +