Societal risk acceptance criteria of the global general cargo ships

被引:5
|
作者
Wang, Jinhui [1 ]
Zhou, Yu [1 ]
Zhang, Shaogang [1 ]
Zhuang, Lei [2 ]
Shi, Long [3 ]
Chen, Jihong [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Hu, Daoxian [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Maritime Univ, Coll Ocean Sci & Engn, Shanghai 201306, Peoples R China
[2] China Classificat Soc, Shanghai Rules & Res Inst, Shanghai 200135, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Sci & Technol China, State Key Lab Fire Sci, Hefei 232001, Peoples R China
[4] Shenzhen Univ, Coll Management, Shenzhen 518071, Peoples R China
[5] Shenzhen Int Maritime Inst, Shenzhen 518081, Peoples R China
[6] Hyde Guangzhou Int Logist Grp Co LTD, Guangzhou 510665, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
General cargo ship; Risk acceptance criteria; Societal risk; F-N curve; ALARP principle; FORMAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT; EXPLOSION ACCIDENTS; OIL; COLLISION; MODEL; FIRE;
D O I
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112162
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
The societal risk acceptance criteria (SRAC) are used in the shipping industry as a ruler to judge whether the actual ship risk is in control. To exploringly refresh SRAC for general cargo ship formulated by International Maritime Organization (IMO) in 2000, a comprehensive analysis was performed by using the accident data recorded in the Marine Casualties and Incidents (MCI) module of the Global Integrated Shipping Information System (GISIS) database from 2005 to 2019. The risk levels of four typical accident factors, including initial event, ship size, classification society, and geographical zone, were evaluated. The results illustrate that the SRAC established in this study for general cargo ship fatality accidents are found stricter than that by IMO presented in 2000. Fire/explosion and capsizing show the highest societal risk levels in the initial events, and large general cargo ships face higher societal risk. In addition, ships that do not belong to the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS) are at a higher risk than IACS ships. And the societal risk levels of fatality accidents in East & Southeast Asia and injury accidents in Europe, the Mediterranean & Black Sea are higher than those in the other zones.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Societal risk acceptance criteria for pressure pipelines in China
    Pei, Jingjing
    Wang, Guantao
    Luo, Sida
    Luo, Yun
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2018, 109 : 20 - 26
  • [2] Safety of general cargo ships
    Mikelis, N
    NAVAL ARCHITECT, 2001, : 26 - 26
  • [3] General cargo ships - danger overlooked?
    Spouge, J
    NAVAL ARCHITECT, 2003, : 30 - +
  • [4] ECONOMIES OF SCALE OF GENERAL CARGO-SHIPS
    JANSSON, JO
    SHNEERSON, D
    REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1978, 60 (02) : 287 - 293
  • [5] New uncertainty modelling for cargo stowage plans of general cargo ships
    Zhang, Daihui
    Qu, Zhuohau
    Wang, Wenxin
    Yu, Jiagen
    Yang, Zaili
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2020, 144
  • [6] Risk criteria for ports and ships
    Trbojevic, V
    MARITIME TRANSPORTATION AND EXPLOITATION OF OCEAN AND COASTAL RESOURCES, VOLS 1 AND 2: VOL 1: VESSELS FOR MARITIME TRANSPORTATION, 2005, : 1629 - 1635
  • [7] Estimating the Risk of Communicable Diseases aboard Cargo Ships
    Schlaich, Clara C.
    Oldenburg, Marcus
    Lamshoeft, Maike M.
    JOURNAL OF TRAVEL MEDICINE, 2009, 16 (06) : 402 - 406
  • [8] Risk assessment for container ships focusing on cargo fire
    Povel, D.
    Langbecker, U.
    Dausendschoen, K.
    Sinai, Y.
    Owens, M.
    Gehl, S.
    Forsman, B.
    Ellis, J.
    Riedel, K.
    Design and Operation of Container Ships, International Conference, 2006, : 161 - 170
  • [9] Summary: Societal risk criteria and pipelines
    Schork, Joan M.
    Lutostansky, Elizabeth M.
    Auvil, Steven R.
    PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2012, 31 (04) : 409 - 410
  • [10] Societal life safety risk criteria
    Zielinski, P. A.
    Baecher, Gregory B.
    COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TECHNOLOGICAL AND INTELLIGENT TERRORISM IMPACTS ON COMPLEX TECHNICAL SYSTEMS, 2012, 102 : 168 - 183