Calcium Scoring at Coronary CT Angiography Using Deep Learning

被引:38
|
作者
Mu, Dan [1 ]
Bai, Junjie [2 ]
Chen, Wenping [1 ]
Yu, Hongming [1 ]
Liang, Jing [1 ]
Yin, Kejie [1 ]
Li, Hui [1 ]
Qing, Zhao [1 ]
He, Kelei [3 ,4 ]
Yang, Hao-Yu [2 ]
Zhang, Jinyao [2 ]
Yin, Youbing [2 ]
McLellan, Hunter W. [5 ]
Schoepf, U. Joseph [6 ]
Zhang, Bing [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Med Sch, Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hosp, Dept Radiol, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Keya Med, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ, Med Sch, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Univ, Natl Inst Healthcare Data Sci, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[5] Univ South Carolina, Sch Med Columbia, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[6] Med Univ South Carolina, Div Cardiovasc Imaging, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[7] Nanjing Univ, Inst Brain Sci, Nanjing 210008, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
DUAL-ENERGY-CT; ARTERY CALCIUM; AUTOMATIC DETECTION; CARDIAC CT; CONTRAST; QUANTIFICATION; FEASIBILITY;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2021211483
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Separate noncontrast CT to quantify the coronary artery calcium (CAC) score often precedes coronary CT angiography (CTA). Quantifying CAC scores directly at CTA would eliminate the additional radiation produced at CT but remains challenging. Purpose: To quantify CAC scores automatically from a single CTA scan. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, a deep learning method to quantify CAC scores automatically from a single CTA scan was developed on training and validation sets of 292 patients and 73 patients collected from March 2019 to July 2020. Virtual noncontrast scans obtained with a spectral CT scanner were used to develop the algorithm to alleviate tedious manual annotation of calcium regions. The proposed method was validated on an independent test set of 240 CTA scans collected from three different CT scanners from August 2020 to November 2020 using the Pearson correlation coefficient, the coefficient of determination, or r(2), and the Bland-Altman plot against the semiautomatic Agatston score at noncontrast CT. The cardiovascular risk categorization performance was evaluated using weighted kappa based on the Agatston score (CAC score risk categories: 0-10, 11-100, 101-400, and >400). Results: Two hundred forty patients (mean age, 60 years 6 11 [standard deviation]; 146 men) were evaluated. The positive correlation between the automatic deep learning CTA and semiautomatic noncontrast CT CAC score was excellent (Pearson correlation = 0.96; r(2) = 0.92). The risk categorization agreement based on deep learning CTA and noncontrast CT CAC scores was excellent (weighted k = 0.94 [95% CI: 0.91, 0.97]), with 223 of 240 scans (93%) categorized correctly. All patients who were miscategorized were in the direct neighboring risk groups. The proposed method's differences from the noncontrast CT CAC score were not statistically significant with regard to scanner (P = .15), sex (P = .051), and section thickness (P = .67). Conclusion: A deep learning automatic calcium scoring method accurately quantified coronary artery calcium from CT angiography images and categorized risk. (c) RSNA, 2021
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 316
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Coronary artery calcium scoring vs. coronary CT angiography for the assessment of occupationally significant coronary artery disease
    Holland, Jennifer
    Eveson, Leanne
    Holdsworth, David
    Nicol, Edward
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2022, 16 (05) : 454 - 459
  • [42] Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Using Virtual Versus True Noncontrast Images From Photon-Counting Coronary CT Angiography
    Haag, Nina P.
    Michael, Arwed E.
    Lennartz, Simon
    Panknin, Christoph
    Niehoff, Julius H.
    Borggrefe, Jan
    Shahzadi, Iram
    Zwanenburg, Alex
    Kroeger, Jan Robert
    RADIOLOGY, 2024, 310 (03)
  • [43] Calcium scoring and contrast-enhanced CT angiography
    Sanz, J.
    Dellegrottaglie, S.
    Fuster, V.
    Rajagopalan, S.
    CURRENT MOLECULAR MEDICINE, 2006, 6 (05) : 525 - 539
  • [44] Effective dose from multislice CT calcium scoring and coronary anglography compared with conventional diagnostic coronary angiography
    Coles, DR
    Smail, M
    Negus, I
    Wilde, P
    Oberhoff, M
    Karsch, K
    Baumbach, A
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 45 (03) : 267A - 267A
  • [45] Prevalence of significant extracoronary findings on multislice CT coronary angiography examinations and coronary artery calcium scoring examinations
    Law, Y. M.
    Huang, J.
    Chen, K.
    Cheah, F. K.
    Chua, T.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2008, 52 (01): : 49 - 56
  • [46] Automated Coronary Artery Identification in CT Angiography: A Deep Learning Approach Using Bounding Boxes
    Sakamoto, Marin
    Yoshimura, Takaaki
    Sugimori, Hiroyuki
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2025, 15 (06):
  • [47] Deep learning–based image restoration algorithm for coronary CT angiography
    Fuminari Tatsugami
    Toru Higaki
    Yuko Nakamura
    Zhou Yu
    Jian Zhou
    Yujie Lu
    Chikako Fujioka
    Toshiro Kitagawa
    Yasuki Kihara
    Makoto Iida
    Kazuo Awai
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 5322 - 5329
  • [48] Deep learning-based atherosclerotic coronary plaque segmentation on coronary CT angiography
    Javorszky, Natasa
    Homonnay, Balint
    Gerstenblith, Gary
    Bluemke, David
    Kiss, Peter
    Torok, Mihaly
    Celentano, David
    Lai, Hong
    Lai, Shenghan
    Kolossvary, Marton
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (10) : 7217 - 7226
  • [49] Automatic coronary calcium scoring using noncontrast and contrast CT images
    Yang, Guanyu
    Chen, Yang
    Ning, Xiufang
    Sun, Qiaoyu
    Shu, Huazhong
    Coatrieux, Jean-Louis
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (05) : 2174 - 2186
  • [50] Deep Learning Analysis of Coronary Arteries in Cardiac CT Angiography for Detection of Patients Requiring Invasive Coronary Angiography
    Zreik, Majd
    van Hamersvelt, Robbert W.
    Khalili, Nadieh
    Wolterink, Jelmer M.
    Voskuil, Michiel
    Viergever, Max A.
    Leiner, Tim
    Isgum, Ivana
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2020, 39 (05) : 1545 - 1557