Preferences of women evaluating risks of tamoxifen (POWER) study of preferences for tamoxifen for breast cancer risk reduction

被引:60
|
作者
Melnikow, J
Paterniti, D
Azari, R
Kuenneth, C
Birch, S
Kuppermann, M
Nuovo, J
Keyzer, J
Henderson, S
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Family & Community Med, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Ctr Hlth Serv Res Primary Care, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[3] McMaster Univ, Ctr Hlth Econ & Policy Anal, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Inst Hlth Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
breast cancer; prevention and control; tamoxifen; decision making;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.20981
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. The objective of this study was to understand the attitudes and preferences of risk-eligible women regarding use of tamoxifen for breast cancer risk reduction. METHODS. A cross-sectional, mixed-methods interview study was conducted at a university medical center and at community sites. Participants were women who had an estimated 5-year breast cancer risk >= 1.7% and no prior breast cancer. Interviews were conducted in English or Spanish. The interview included a 15-minute, standardized educational session on the potential benefits and harms of tamoxifen followed by close-ended and open-ended questions about participants' inclinations to take tamoxifen and factors important to their decision. A demographic questionnaire, a test on knowledge of potential benefits and harms of tamoxifen, and an interview evaluation were included. RESULTS. Two hundred fifty-five women completed interviews. Their estimated mean 5-year breast cancer risk was 2.8%; and their mean self-perceived 5-year risk was 32.7%. After the educational intervention, 45 women (17.6%) were inclined to take tamoxifen. Very high risk women (> 3.5%) were no more inclined to take it than women with lower risk (1.7-3.5%). In a multivariable analysis, lower income, confidence in the effectiveness of tamoxifen, and concern about fractures were associated with being inclined to take it; concern about pulmonary embolism, dyspareunia, cataracts, and low self-perceived breast cancer risk were associated negatively with taking tamoxifen. Participants expressed concerns about adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS. Less than 20% of women were interested in tamoxifen after education about potential benefits and harms, despite a very high self-perceived breast cancer risk. Candidate chemoprevention agents must have few potential adverse effects to achieve widespread acceptance. (c) 2005 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:1996 / 2005
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Tamoxifen for breast cancer among hysterectomised women
    Veronesi, U
    Maisonneuve, P
    Sacchini, V
    Rotmensz, N
    Boyle, P
    LANCET, 2002, 359 (9312): : 1122 - 1124
  • [42] Tamoxifen for treatment of premenopausal women with breast cancer
    Lam, RY
    Chlebowski, RT
    CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2000, 18 (07) : 681 - 684
  • [43] The Cardiovascular Risks Associated with Aromatase Inhibitors, Tamoxifen, and GnRH Agonists in Women with Breast Cancer
    Alfaris, Ibrahim
    Asselah, Jamil
    Aziz, Haya
    Bouganim, Nathaniel
    Mousavi, Negareh
    CURRENT ATHEROSCLEROSIS REPORTS, 2023, 25 (04) : 145 - 154
  • [44] The Cardiovascular Risks Associated with Aromatase Inhibitors, Tamoxifen, and GnRH Agonists in Women with Breast Cancer
    Ibrahim Alfaris
    Jamil Asselah
    Haya Aziz
    Nathaniel Bouganim
    Negareh Mousavi
    Current Atherosclerosis Reports, 2023, 25 : 145 - 154
  • [47] Stroke risk and tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer
    Geiger, AM
    Fischberg, GM
    Chen, WS
    Bernstein, L
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (20): : 1528 - 1536
  • [48] Raloxifene and tamoxifen reduce breast cancer risk
    Slawson, David
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2006, 74 (07) : 1196 - +
  • [49] Stroke risk and tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer
    Geiger, AM
    Fischberg, G
    Chen, W
    Petitti, DB
    Bernstein, L
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 159 (11) : S99 - S99