Evaluation of two RT-PCR techniques for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in serum for microbiological diagnosis

被引:6
|
作者
Martin Ramirez, Alexandra [1 ]
Zurita Cruz, Nelly Daniela [1 ]
Gutierrez-Cobos, Ainhoa [1 ]
Rodriguez Serrano, Diego Anibal [2 ]
Gonzalez Alvaro, Isidoro [3 ]
Roy Vallejo, Emilia [4 ]
Gomez de Frutos, Sara [1 ]
Fontan Garcia-Rodrigo, Leticia [1 ]
Cardenoso Domingo, Laura [1 ]
机构
[1] La Princesa Univ Hosp, Clin Microbiol Dept, C Diego de Leon 62, Madrid 28006, Spain
[2] La Princesa Univ Hosp, Intes Care Dept, Madrid, Spain
[3] La Princesa Univ Hosp, Rheumatol Dept, Madrid, Spain
[4] La Princesa Univ Hosp, Internal Med Dept, Madrid, Spain
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; RNA; Serum; rRT-PCR; COVID-19; CORONAVIRUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114411
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in serum (viremia) of COVID-19 patients has been related to poor prognosis and death. The aim of this study was to evaluate both the ability to detect viremia in COVID-19 patients of two commercial reverse real-time-PCR (rRT-PCR) tests, Cobas (R) and TaqPath (TM), comparing them with a gold standard method, and their implementation in microbiology laboratories. This retrospective cohort study included 303 adult patients (203 diagnosed with COVID-19 and 100 nonCOVID-19 patients) admitted to a tertiary hospital, with at least one serum sample collected within the first 48 h from admission. A total of 365 serum samples were included: 100 from non-COVID patients (pre-pandemic and pandemic control groups) and 265 from COVID-19 patients. Serum samples were considered positive when at least one target was detected. All patients in control groups showed negative viremia. Cobas (R) and TaqPath (TM) tests showed specificity and Positive Predictive Value over 96%. Nevertheless, sensitivity (53.72 and 73.63, respectively) and Negative Predictive Value (64.78 and 75) were lower. Viremia difference between ICU and non-ICU patients was significant (p < 0.001) for both techniques. Consequently, SARS-CoV-2 viremia detection by both rRT-PCR tests should be considered a good tool to stratify COVID-19 patients and could be implemented in microbiology laboratories.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Authors' response: SARS-CoV-2 detection by real-time RT-PCR
    Corman, Victor M.
    Drosten, Christian
    EUROSURVEILLANCE, 2020, 25 (21): : 35 - 35
  • [42] Positive pleural fluid RT-PCR for virus detection in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia
    Malik, M. I.
    Fox, N.
    Chopra, A.
    Hughes, H. Y.
    Washburn, R.
    Huggins, J. T.
    QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 113 (12) : 888 - 889
  • [43] Sensitivity of ID NOW and RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in an ambulatory population
    Tu, Yuan-Po
    Iqbal, Jameel
    O'Leary, Timothy
    ELIFE, 2021, 10
  • [44] Development of a rapid viability RT-PCR assay for detection of infectious SARS-CoV-2
    Veugen, Judith
    Schoenmakers, Tom
    van Loo, Inge
    Leers, Mathie
    Nuijts, Rudy
    Savelkoul, Paul
    Dickman, Mor
    Wolffs, Petra
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2023, 64 (08)
  • [45] New RT-PCR Assay for the Detection of Current and Future SARS-CoV-2 Variants
    Marchini, Antonio
    Petrillo, Mauro
    Parrish, Amy
    Buttinger, Gerhard
    Tavazzi, Simona
    Querci, Maddalena
    Betsou, Fay
    Elsinga, Goffe
    Medema, Gertjan
    Abdelrahman, Tamir
    Gawlik, Bernd
    Corbisier, Philippe
    VIRUSES-BASEL, 2023, 15 (01):
  • [46] Assessment of Real-Time RT-PCR Kits for SARS-CoV-2 Detection
    Okamaoto, Kiyoko
    Shirato, Kazuya
    Nao, Naganori
    Saito, Shinji
    Kageyama, Tsutomu
    Hasegawa, Hideki
    Suzuki, Tadaki
    Matsuyama, Shutoku
    Takeda, Makoto
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 73 (05) : 366 - 368
  • [47] SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR and Chest CT, two complementary approaches for COVID-19 diagnosis
    Farfour, Eric
    Mellot, Francois
    Lesprit, Philippe
    Vasse, Marc
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 38 (12) : 1209 - 1210
  • [48] SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR and Chest CT, two complementary approaches for COVID-19 diagnosis
    Eric Farfour
    François Mellot
    Philippe Lesprit
    Marc Vasse
    Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2020, 38 : 1209 - 1210
  • [49] Comparison of RT-PCR, RT-LAMP, and Antigen Quantification Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Tanimoto, Yoshihiko
    Mori, Ai
    Miyamoto, Sonoko
    Ito, Erika
    Arikawa, Kentaro
    Iwamoto, Tomotada
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 75 (03) : 249 - 253
  • [50] Validation of SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Saliva Samples by Real-Time PCR (RT-PCR)
    Melo, N. C.
    Silva, E. M.
    Tada, M. T.
    Silva, J. S. L.
    Nociti, D. A.
    Lima, A. S.
    Cavalcanti, C. F. A.
    Coudry, R. A.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 25 (06): : S39 - S39