Evaluation of maize production under mobile drip irrigation

被引:11
|
作者
Oker, Tobias E. [1 ,4 ]
Kisekka, Isaya [2 ,3 ]
Sheshukov, Aleksey Y. [1 ]
Aguilar, Jonathan [1 ,4 ]
Rogers, Danny H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Land Air & Water Resources, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] BAE, Arlington, VA 22209 USA
[4] Kansas State Univ, Southwest Res Extens Ctr, Garden City, NY USA
关键词
Mobile Drip Irrigation; LEPA; LESA; Center-pivot; Irrigation; Ogallala; YIELD RESPONSE; WATER-STRESS; GRAIN-YIELD; CORN YIELD; BIOMASS; NITROGEN; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.agwat.2018.07.047
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Declining water levels in the Ogallala aquifer of the U.S. High Plains necessitate more efficient irrigation technology to sustain agricultural production. A study to evaluate the performance of Mobile Drip Irrigation (MDI) for maize production, in comparison to common center-pivot nozzles (Low Elevation Spray Application (LESA) and Low Energy Precision Application (LEPA)) was conducted. A center-pivot was retrofitted with MDI, LEPA and LESA. Irrigation capacities of 6.3, 3.1, and 1.6 mm/d were considered. Grain yield, water use efficiency, above ground biomass, leaf area index (LAI), and soil water content was compared. Differences in grain yield between irrigation application devices were not significant (p = 0.085), but there were differences between irrigation capacities (p < 0.0001) at 5% significance level. There were no significant differences in monthly biomass yield between the application devices but there were significant differences in biomass yield between irrigation capacities. There were no significant differences in LAI between both the application devices and irrigation capacities. There were no significant differences in water use efficiency between the application technologies (p = 0.2352), at 5% significance level, however, differences between irrigation capacities were significant (p = 0.050). Generally, crop biophysical measurements under MDI were not significantly different from those under LEPA and LESA. Any marginal benefits of MDI were likely masked by rainfall, thus further evaluation of MDI is recommended under conditions of less applied water than LEPA or LESA accompanied by low rainfall. The other benefits of MDI were found in reduction of wheel-track rutting and ease of carrying out fertigation.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 21
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PRODUCTION AND WATER CONSUMPTION OF EGGPLANT UNDER SALT STRESS AND CONTINUOUS DRIP AND PULSE DRIP IRRIGATION
    Damasceno, Lucas Farias
    Watanabe Cova, Alide Mitsue
    Gheyi, Hans Raj
    De Almeida, Willian Fernandes
    Amorim Leite Dias, Jose Andrey
    Ribeiro, Vitor De Souza
    REVISTA CAATINGA, 2022, 35 (02) : 450 - 459
  • [22] Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) production under subsurface drip irrigation with two types of drip tape
    Prado-Hernandez, J., V
    Hernandez-Saucedo, F. R.
    Carrillo-Garcia, M.
    Pineda-Pineda, J.
    Gutierrez-Campos, A. H.
    Valentin-Paz, O. G.
    XXX INTERNATIONAL HORTICULTURAL CONGRESS (IHC2018): INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON WATER AND NUTRIENT RELATIONS AND MANAGEMENT OF HORTICULTURAL CROPS, 2019, 1253 : 397 - 404
  • [23] Evaluation of subsurface, mulched and non-mulched surface drip irrigation for maize production and economic benefits in northeast China
    Dan Wang
    Guangyong Li
    Yan Mo
    Ding Zhang
    Xinhan Xu
    Carol Jo Wilkerson
    Gerrit Hoogenboom
    Irrigation Science, 2021, 39 : 159 - 171
  • [24] Evaluation of subsurface, mulched and non-mulched surface drip irrigation for maize production and economic benefits in northeast China
    Wang, Dan
    Li, Guangyong
    Mo, Yan
    Zhang, Ding
    Xu, Xinhan
    Wilkerson, Carol Jo
    Hoogenboom, Gerrit
    IRRIGATION SCIENCE, 2021, 39 (02) : 159 - 171
  • [25] Simulation and Evaluation of Spring Maize Growth Under Drip Irrigation with Fully Biodegradable Film Mulching Based on the DSSAT Model
    Jia, Yanhui
    Shi, Haibin
    Miao, Qingfeng
    Sun, Xiulu
    Feng, Yayang
    PLANTS-BASEL, 2024, 13 (21):
  • [26] Reduced Water Use in Barley and Maize Production Through Conservation Agriculture and Drip Irrigation
    Fonteyne, Simon
    Flores Garcia, Alvaro
    Verhulst, Nele
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2021, 5
  • [27] PRODUCTION AND QUALITY OF MINI WATERMELON UNDER DRIP IRRIGATION WITH BRACKISH WATER
    Gomes do O, Lais Monique
    Watanabe Cova, Alide Mitsue
    Gheyi, Hans Raj
    da Silva, Neilon Duarte
    de Azevedo Neto, Andre Dias
    REVISTA CAATINGA, 2020, 33 (03) : 766 - 774
  • [28] Coin production under subsurface drip irrigation and application of cow manure
    Salazar-Sosa, E.
    Trejo-Escareno, H. I.
    Vazquez-Vazquez, C.
    Lopez-Martinez, J. D.
    PHYTON-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2007, 76 : 169 - 185
  • [29] Regulated Deficit Drip Irrigation Influences on Seed Maize Growth and Yield under Film
    Zhang Jinxia
    Cheng Ziyong
    Zhang Rui
    2012 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODERN HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING, 2012, 28 : 464 - 468
  • [30] Simulation of water balance in a maize field under film-mulching drip irrigation
    He, Qinsi
    Li, Sien
    Kang, Shaozhong
    Yang, Hanbo
    Qin, Shujing
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2018, 210 : 252 - 260