What has been said, and what remains to be said, about the balanced scorecard?

被引:0
|
作者
Clara Banchieri, Lucia [1 ]
Campa Planas, Fernando [1 ]
Sanchez Rebull, Maria Victoria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rovira & Virgili, Dept Business Adm, Reus 43204, Spain
关键词
balanced scorecard applicability; literature review; critical analysis; PERFORMANCE-MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PROJECT INFORMATION-MANAGEMENT; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; HEALTH-CARE; STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE; KNOWLEDGE-MANAGEMENT; FINANCIAL-SERVICES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to address the paradox that while the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) tool enjoys widespread penetration in the corporate world, at a theoretical level it has received many and varied criticisms. The hypothesis is that the BSC is based on a solid theoretical model that is applicable to companies. This hypothesis is analysed by means of a literature review. This review has been done over 955 documents containing the same expression related to BSC in the ISI database. Finally, after some filter criteria, 309 articles have been analyzed. The conclusion of the study is that the assumed hypothesis has been confirmed. The BSC is a model that has evolved and been honed over the years to the point where it currently has a solid and applicable theoretical foundation, which is made possible by implementing it in various sectors and countries. However, there are still some questionable aspects with regard to certain elements of the model (perspectives, indicators and cause and effect relationship).
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 192
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条