共 50 条
Is there an association between non-dipping blood pressure and measures of glucose variability in type 1 diabetes?
被引:7
|作者:
Jaiswal, Mamta
[1
]
Ang, Lynn
[2
]
Mizokami-Stout, Kara
[2
]
Pop-Busui, Rodica
[2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Neurol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Internal Med, Div Metab Endocrinol & Diabet, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词:
Non-dipping blood pressure;
Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy;
Glucose variability;
Type;
1;
diabetes;
Blood pressure variability;
AUTONOMIC NEUROPATHY;
GLYCEMIC VARIABILITY;
COMPLICATIONS;
MELLITUS;
MORTALITY;
OUTCOMES;
IMPACT;
TRIAL;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2018.07.008
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Aim: To assess the relationship between glucose variability (GV) and non-dipping of blood pressure (BP) as a marker of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) among patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Methods: Forty-one subjects with T1D (age 34 +/- 13 years, duration 13 +/- 6 years, HbA1c 8 +/- 1.2%) without cardiovascular disease, dyslipidemia, or hypertension at baseline were enrolled in a 3-year observational cohort study. Subjects were phenotyped for CAN with heart rate variability, cardiovascular autonomic reflex tests, and 24-h BP profiles at baseline and during follow-up. Non-dipping was defined as nocturnal systolic and diastolic BP fall of <= 10%. Reverse dipping BP was defined as a <0% change in the day to night for systolic and diastolic BP. Indices of GV were derived from 5-day continuous glucose monitoring obtained at 3-month intervals, and serum inflammatory biomarkers in all subjects. Results: At baseline 10% of the T1D subjects were non-dippers. The dippers and non-dippers were similar in age, diabetes duration, glucose control, traditional cardiovascular risk factors, GV and inflammatory markers. No significant correlations were found at baseline between non-dipping nocturnal blood pressure and measures of GV. At 3 years there were no differences in risk factor profile of subjects who were non-dippers over time (progressors) and those who were dippers (non-progressors). Conclusion: In a cohort of contemporary patients with T1D following the current standard of care in diabetes, the prevalence of non-dipping is relatively low. There were no clear phenotypes that explained the difference in the risk for non-dipping, including GV. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring could be used as a tool for improved CVD risk stratification and development of therapeutic interventions in these patients. Published by Elsevier Inc
引用
收藏
页码:947 / 950
页数:4
相关论文