Being Wrong: Logics for False Belief

被引：10
|
作者：
Steinsvold, Christopher [1 ]
机构：
[1] CUNY Brooklyn Coll, Dept Philosophy, Brooklyn, NY 11210 USA
来源：
NOTRE DAME JOURNAL OF FORMAL LOGIC | 2011年 / 52卷 / 03期
关键词：
modal logic; wrong; incorrect; false; belief;
D O I：
10.1215/00294527-1435438
中图分类号：
O1 [数学];
学科分类号：
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要：
We introduce an operator to represent the simple notion of being wrong. Read Wp to mean: the agent is wrong about p. Being wrong about p means believing p though p is false. We add this operator to the language of propositional logic and study it. We introduce a canonical model for logics of being wrong, show completeness for the minimal logic of being wrong and various other systems. En route we examine the expressiveness of the language. In conclusion, we discuss an open question regarding K4.
引用
收藏
页码：245 / 253
页数：9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Logics of Belief over Weighted Structures
    Ma, Minghui
    Guo, Meiyun
    LOGIC, RATIONALITY, AND INTERACTION, 2011, 6953 : 206 - 219
  • [32] Logics for Belief as Maximally Plausible Possibility
    Bonanno, Giacomo
    STUDIA LOGICA, 2020, 108 (05) : 1019 - 1061
  • [33] Abductive logics in a belief revision framework
    Bernard Walliser
    Denis Zwirn
    Hervé Zwirn
    Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 2004, 14 (1) : 87 - 117
  • [34] Some logics of iterated belief change
    Cantwell J.
    Studia Logica, 1999, 63 (1) : 49 - 84
  • [35] Logics of belief change without linearity
    Cantwell, J
    JOURNAL OF SYMBOLIC LOGIC, 2000, 65 (04) : 1556 - 1575
  • [36] Abductive logics in a belief revision framework
    Walliser B.
    Zwirn D.
    Zwirn H.
    Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 2005, 14 (1) : 87 - 117
  • [37] Degrees of rationality in weak logics of belief
    Zimmermann, E
    ANALYOMEN 2, VOL I: LOGIC, EPISTEMOLOGY, PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 1997, 16 : 183 - 193
  • [38] Clausal Tableaux for Multimodal Logics of Belief
    Gore, Rajeev
    Nguyen, Linh Anh
    FUNDAMENTA INFORMATICAE, 2009, 94 (01) : 21 - 40
  • [39] FALSE PREMISES, WRONG CONCLUSIONS
    GOMEZ, AP
    BULLETIN OF THE ATOMIC SCIENTISTS, 1995, 51 (02) : 69 - 69
  • [40] BEING RIGHT IN SPITE OF BEING WRONG
    TRAYNHAM, JG
    CHEMTECH, 1985, 15 (02) : 126 - 128
12345