Chronic low back pain. Replication of different reaction groups

被引:0
|
作者
Hondorf, M. [1 ]
Morfeld, M. [1 ]
Moeller, M.
Hoeder, J. [2 ]
Koch, U. [3 ]
机构
[1] Hsch Magdeburg Stendal, Angew Humanwissensch, D-39576 Stendal, Germany
[2] Klinikum Bad Bramstedt, Bad Bramstedt, Germany
[3] Univ Klinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Inst & Poliklin Med Psychol, Hamburg, Germany
来源
SCHMERZ | 2010年 / 24卷 / 04期
关键词
Chronic low back pain; Pain coping; Endurance strategies; Different reaction groups; VARIABLES; DISABILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00482-010-0944-9
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background. The aim of the study was to replicate the different reaction groups: "Frohlicher Durchhalter (FD)" who are characterised by a positive mood and endurance strategies, "Depressiver Durchhalter (DD)" with depressive mood and cognitions to hold on and "Depressiver Vermeider (Dv)" who are depressed with social and physical avoidance strategies. The replication was conducted with more feasible methods than the Kiel Pain Inventory (KPI), which had been frequently used in former research. This might effectuate a superior intervention outcome. Patients/methods. The sample (n=290) consisted of patients after their first nucleotomy at the beginning of the inpatient medical rehabilitation. Selection of the scales was based on cognitive-emotional and behavioural pain characteristics. Therefore 14 scales of generic standardised questionnaires were investigated Results. The cluster analysis revealed two heterogeneous groups: the FD (n=203, 75.7%) and DV (n=65, 24.3%). MANOVA showed significant differences between both groups (Wilks' lambda: F (14,253)=30.97; p<.001); especially the emotional pain characteristics were relevant. Conclusion. The study contributes to the methodological stability of two postulated groups. Thus further research should foster the development of risk-based interventions to evaluate if these groups offer an appropriate differentiation in rehabilitation.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 341
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quality of life evaluation of treatment outcomes with etoricoxib in patients with chronic low back pain.
    Geba, G
    Bohidar, N
    Straus, W
    Petruschke, RA
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2004, 52 (04) : S64 - S64
  • [32] Randomized trial of mindfulness meditation in older adults for the treatment of chronic low back pain.
    Morone, NE
    Weiner, D
    Greco, C
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 20 : 58 - 58
  • [33] Office visits and services among managed care patients with chronic low back pain.
    Platts-Mills, T
    Tisnado, D
    Chen, WP
    Kahn, KL
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2003, 51 : S121 - S121
  • [34] Severity of chronic back pain. Assessment with the Mainz Pain Staging System
    Michalski, D.
    Hinz, A.
    SCHMERZ, 2006, 20 (03): : 198 - +
  • [35] Disability scales in low back pain. Interest of the Quebec back pain disability scale
    Calmels, P
    Thomas, M
    Bethoux, F
    Nayme, P
    Richard, A
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1997, 6 (7-8) : 56 - 56
  • [36] The biomechanics of back pain.
    Bridger, R
    ERGONOMICS, 2004, 47 (03) : 361 - 361
  • [37] Ozone therapy for low back pain. A systematic review
    Costa, T.
    Linhares, D.
    Ribeiro da Silva, M.
    Neves, N.
    ACTA REUMATOLOGICA PORTUGUESA, 2018, 43 (03): : 172 - 181
  • [38] No correlation between fluctuating asymmetry and low back pain.
    Ngo, AN
    Thomas, J
    Martin, JT
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2006, 54 (01) : S172 - S172
  • [39] Predictors of Persistence in People with Subacute Low Back Pain.
    Torbey, Souraya
    Mansour, Ali
    Herrmann, Kristina
    Baliki, Marwan
    Schnitzer, Thomas J.
    Apkarian, A. Vania
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2012, 64 (10): : S465 - S466
  • [40] SURVEY OF RUNNERS AND WALKERS WITH AND WITHOUT LOW BACK PAIN.
    Woolf, S. K.
    Barfield, W. R.
    Nietert, P. J.
    Mainous, A.
    Glaser, J. A.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2001, 33 (05): : S186 - S186