Factors Affecting Shark Detection from Drone Patrols in Southeast Queensland, Eastern Australia

被引:3
|
作者
Mitchell, Jonathan D. [1 ]
Scott-Holland, Tracey B. [2 ]
Butcher, Paul A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Govt, Dept Agr & Fisheries, Anim Sci, Ecosci Precinct, 41 Boggo Rd, Dutton Pk, Qld 4102, Australia
[2] Queensland Govt, Dept Agr & Fisheries, Fisheries Queensland, 41 George St, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
[3] Southern Cross Univ, New South Wales Dept Primary Ind, Fisheries, Natl Marine Sci Ctr, Coffs Harbour, NSW 2450, Australia
来源
BIOLOGY-BASEL | 2022年 / 11卷 / 11期
关键词
shark monitoring; beach safety; drones; southeast Queensland; COASTAL; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.3390/biology11111552
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Drones offer the potential for monitoring sharks at beaches to improve public safety. It is necessary to investigate their effectiveness at detecting sharks in conditions specific to Southeast Queensland, because they have not previously been used in this capacity in this region. The Queensland SharkSmart drone trial ran for 12 months at five beaches, in 2020-2021. The trial ran 3369 flights and sighted 174 sharks (including 48 large sharks over 2 m in length). Sharks were sighted on 3% of flights on average, with North Stradbroke Island having the highest shark sighting rate. We found that location, the sighting of other marine life, season and time of day all had an important impact on the likelihood of sighting a shark from the drones. Overall, we demonstrated that drones could operate across a range of weather conditions and detect sharks effectively. Additionally, the drones provided extra safety benefits because they were used to identify swimmers caught in rip currents and locate missing persons. This research highlights the broad value of drones as a public safety tool at beaches, and the results of this study will help refine the operation of drones to further improve their effectiveness in the future. Drones enable the monitoring for sharks in real-time, enhancing the safety of ocean users with minimal impact on marine life. Yet, the effectiveness of drones for detecting sharks (especially potentially dangerous sharks; i.e., white shark, tiger shark, bull shark) has not yet been tested at Queensland beaches. To determine effectiveness, it is necessary to understand how environmental and operational factors affect the ability of drones to detect sharks. To assess this, we utilised data from the Queensland SharkSmart drone trial, which operated at five southeast Queensland beaches for 12 months in 2020-2021. The trial conducted 3369 flights, covering 1348 km and sighting 174 sharks (48 of which were >2 m in length). Of these, eight bull sharks and one white shark were detected, leading to four beach evacuations. The shark sighting rate was 3% when averaged across all beaches, with North Stradbroke Island (NSI) having the highest sighting rate (17.9%) and Coolum North the lowest (0%). Drone pilots were able to differentiate between key shark species, including white, bull and whaler sharks, and estimate total length of the sharks. Statistical analysis indicated that location, the sighting of other fauna, season and flight number (proxy for time of day) influenced the probability of sighting sharks.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Factors affecting the detection of possums by spotlighting in Western Australia
    Wayne, AF
    Cowling, A
    Rooney, JF
    Ward, CG
    Wheeler, IB
    Lindenmayer, DB
    Donnelly, CF
    WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2005, 32 (08) : 689 - 700
  • [22] Shark detection probability from aerial drone surveys within a temperate estuary
    Benavides, Martin T.
    Fodrie, F. Joel
    Johnston, David W.
    JOURNAL OF UNMANNED VEHICLE SYSTEMS, 2020, 8 (01): : 44 - 56
  • [23] Factors affecting microhabitat use in two agamid species from south-eastern Australia
    Westaway, Dylan M.
    Jolly, Chris J.
    Michael, Damian R.
    Nimmo, Dale G.
    AUSTRAL ECOLOGY, 2024, 49 (07)
  • [24] AGE AND GROWTH OF THE AUSTRALIAN SHARPNOSE SHARK, RHIZOPRIONODON-TAYLORI, FROM NORTH QUEENSLAND, AUSTRALIA
    SIMPFENDORFER, CA
    ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY OF FISHES, 1993, 36 (03) : 233 - 241
  • [25] Enhancing the value of multiple use plantations: a case study from southeast Queensland, Australia
    Maraseni, Tek Narayan
    Cockfield, Geoff
    Cadman, Tim
    Chen, Guangnan
    Qu, Jiansheng
    AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS, 2012, 86 (03) : 451 - 462
  • [26] Enhancing the value of multiple use plantations: a case study from southeast Queensland, Australia
    Tek Narayan Maraseni
    Geoff Cockfield
    Tim Cadman
    Guangnan Chen
    Jiansheng Qu
    Agroforestry Systems, 2012, 86 : 451 - 462
  • [27] A comparison of greenhouse gas emissions from inputs into farm enterprises in southeast Queensland, Australia
    Maraseni, Tek N.
    Cockfield, Geoff
    Apan, Armando
    Journal of Environmental Science and Health - Part A Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering, 2007, 42 (01): : 11 - 18
  • [28] A comparison of greenhouse gas emissions from inputs into farm enterprises in Southeast Queensland, Australia
    Maraseni, Tek N.
    Cockfield, Geoff
    Apan, Armando
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2007, 42 (01): : 11 - 18
  • [29] A new species of Gillbeea (Cunoniaceae) from north-eastern Queensland, Australia
    Rozefelds, AC
    Pellow, B
    NORDIC JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2000, 20 (04) : 435 - 441
  • [30] Factors affecting the spread of Culicoides brevitarsis at the southern limit of distribution in eastern Australia
    Bishop, AL
    Spohr, LJ
    Barchia, IM
    BLUETONGUE, PT 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 40 (03): : 316 - 319