Circadian genes and risk of prostate cancer in the prostate cancer prevention trial

被引:20
|
作者
Chu, Lisa W. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Till, Cathee [4 ]
Yang, Baiyu [3 ]
Tangen, Catherine M. [4 ]
Goodman, Phyllis J. [4 ]
Yu, Kai [5 ]
Zhu, Yong [6 ]
Han, Summer [3 ]
Hoque, Ashraful M. [7 ]
Ambrosone, Christine [8 ]
Thompson, Ian [9 ,10 ]
Leach, Robin [9 ]
Hsing, Ann W. [1 ,2 ,3 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Canc Prevent Inst Calif, Fremont, CA USA
[2] NCI, Div Canc Epidemiol & Genet, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] Stanford Sch Med, Stanford Canc Inst, Stanford, CA USA
[4] SWOG Stat Ctr, Seattle, WA USA
[5] NCI, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[6] Yale Univ, New Haven, CT USA
[7] MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX USA
[8] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[9] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[10] Santa Rosa Med Ctr, CHRISTUS, San Antonio, TX USA
[11] Stanford Sch Med, Stanford Prevent Res Ctr, Dept Med, Stanford, CA USA
关键词
circadian genes; finasteride; genetic polymorphisms; prostate cancer; prostate cancer prevention trial; DIABETES-MELLITUS; ANDROGEN RECEPTOR; SHIFT-WORK; COHORT; CLOCK; IDENTIFICATION; ASSOCIATION; MORTALITY; PILOTS; LIGHT;
D O I
10.1002/mc.22770
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Circadian genes have been considered as a possible biological mechanism for the observed relationship between circadian rhythm disruptions and increased risk of hormone-related cancers. In the current study, we investigated the relationship between circadian gene variants and prostate cancer risk and whether reducing bioavailable testosterone modifies the circadian genes-prostate cancer relationship. We conducted a nested case-control study among Caucasian men in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT), a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial to assess if finasteride (an androgen bioactivation inhibitor) could prevent prostate cancer. We evaluated the associations between 240 circadian gene variations and prostate cancer risk among 1092 biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer cases and 1089 biopsy-negative controls in the study (642 cases and 667 controls from the placebo group; 450 cases and 422 controls from the finasteride group), stratified by treatment group. Among men in the finasteride group, there were suggestive associations between NPAS2 variants and total prostate cancer risk, with one SNP remaining statistically significant after Bonferroni correction (rs746924, odds ratio [OR]=1.5, P=9.6x10(-5)). However, we found little evidence of increased prostate cancer risk (overall or by low/high grade) associated with circadian gene variations in men of the placebo group, suggesting potential modification of genetic effects by treatment. We did not find strong evidence that circadian gene variants influenced prostate cancer risk in men who were not on finasteride treatment. There were suggestive associations between NPAS2 variants and prostate cancer risk among men using finasteride, which warrants further investigations.
引用
收藏
页码:462 / 466
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Serum Lycopene Concentration and Prostate Cancer Risk: Results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial
    Kristal, Alan R.
    Till, Cathee
    Platz, Elizabeth A.
    Song, Xiaoling
    King, Irena B.
    Neuhouser, Marian L.
    Ambrosone, Christine B.
    Thompson, Ian M.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2011, 20 (04) : 638 - 646
  • [22] Serum markers, obesity and prostate cancer risk: results from the prostate cancer prevention trial
    Chau, Cindy H.
    Till, Cathee
    Price, Douglas K.
    Goodman, Phyllis J.
    Neuhouser, Marian L.
    Pollak, Michael N.
    Thompson, Ian M.
    Figg, William D.
    ENDOCRINE-RELATED CANCER, 2022, 29 (02) : 99 - 109
  • [23] Reduction in the Risk of Prostate Cancer: Future Directions After the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial COMMENT
    Thompson, Ian M.
    UROLOGY, 2010, 75 (03) : 509 - 510
  • [24] Alcohol Consumption, Finasteride, and Prostate Cancer Risk Results From the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial
    Gong, Zhihong
    Kristal, Alan R.
    Schenk, Jeannette M.
    Tangen, Catherine M.
    Goodman, Phyllis J.
    Thompson, Ian M.
    CANCER, 2009, 115 (16) : 3661 - 3669
  • [25] Vitamin D in Blood and Risk of Prostate Cancer: Lessons from the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial and the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial
    Schwartz, Gary G.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2014, 23 (08) : 1447 - 1449
  • [26] Association between variants in genes involved in the immune response and prostate cancer risk in men randomized to finasteride in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial
    Winchester, Danyelle A.
    Till, Cathee
    Xu, Jianfeng
    Thompson, Ian M.
    Lippmann, Scott M.
    Parnes, Howard L.
    De Marzo, Angelo M.
    Drake, Charles G.
    Platz, Elizabeth A.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76
  • [27] Associations between polymorphisms in genes related to estrogen metabolism and function and prostate cancer risk: results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial
    Tang, Li
    Platek, Mary E.
    Yao, Song
    Till, Cathee
    Goodman, Phyllis J.
    Tangen, Catherine M.
    Wu, Yue
    Platz, Elizabeth A.
    Neuhouser, Marian L.
    Stanczyk, Frank Z.
    Reichardt, Juergen K. V.
    Santella, Regina M.
    Hsing, Ann
    Figg, William D.
    Lippman, Scott M.
    Thompson, Ian M.
    Ambrosone, Christine B.
    CARCINOGENESIS, 2018, 39 (02) : 125 - 133
  • [28] Prostate stromal cell telomere shortening is associated with risk of prostate cancer in the placebo arm of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial
    Heaphy, Christopher M.
    Gaonkar, Gaurav
    Peskoe, Sarah B.
    Joshu, Corinne E.
    De Marzo, Angelo M.
    Lucia, M. Scott
    Goodman, Phyllis J.
    Lippman, Scott M.
    Thompson, Ian M., Jr.
    Platz, Elizabeth A.
    Meeker, Alan K.
    PROSTATE, 2015, 75 (11): : 1160 - 1166
  • [29] Genes and prostate cancer risk
    不详
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1997, 89 (02) : 105 - 105
  • [30] High-Grade Prostate Cancer and the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial
    Logothetis, Christopher J.
    Schellhammer, Paul F.
    CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH, 2008, 1 (03) : 151 - 152