Propulsion velocity of a flapping wing at low Reynolds number

被引:12
|
作者
Lee, JiSeok [1 ]
Seo, InSoo [1 ]
Lee, SangHwan [1 ]
机构
[1] Hanyang Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Seoul 133791, South Korea
关键词
Fruit fly; Propulsion velocity; Flapping wing; Fluid structure interaction; Lattice Boltzmann; Immersed boundary; LATTICE-BOLTZMANN METHOD; FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION; IMMERSED BOUNDARY METHOD; FICTITIOUS DOMAIN METHOD; FLEXIBLE PLATE; FLOWS; SIMULATIONS; MODEL; LOCOMOTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2014.12.002
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
This paper presents a computational fluid-structure interaction analysis for free movements with a flapping wing in a quiescent fluid. We demonstrated the moving velocity of a flapping wing according to the phase difference between the angle of attack and the positional angle in the case of a fruit fly with a Reynolds number of 136. If we considered the moving velocity of the flapping wing, the physics were different from that of hovering flight of previous studies, which did not consider the propulsive velocity and presented the advanced rotation of the angle of attack as the best mechanism for propulsion force, as compared to symmetric rotation and delayed rotation. We found that symmetric rotation produced a better propulsion velocity with less fluctuation in other direction than the advanced rotation. The hairpin vortex generated at the end of a stroke did not clearly contribute to the enhancement of propulsion; the wake capture is considered to be one of the main enhancements of the advanced rotation in a previous studies. We studied the effects of the angle of attack to determine why the fruit fly uses a large angle of attack during a constant angle of attack period. Larger angles of attack produced greater propulsion velocities. Further, larger angles of attack did not generate greater peal< force during the rotation of the angle of attack at the reversal of stroke, but they produced less fluctuation at the reversal of the stroke and greater force during the constant angle of attack period. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:422 / 439
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EFFECTS OF KINEMATICS ON LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER WING
    Mojgani, Rambod
    Tadjfar, Mehran
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME FLUIDS ENGINEERING DIVISION SUMMER MEETING, 2013, VOL 1A: SYMPOSIA, 2014,
  • [32] Aerodynamic center of a wing at low Reynolds number
    Maji, Arnesh
    Pandi, Jawahar Sivabharathy Samuthira
    Mittal, Sanjay
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2024, 36 (03)
  • [33] Flapping rotary wing: A novel low-Reynolds number layout merging bionic features into micro rotors
    Chen, Long
    Cheng, Cheng
    Zhou, Chao
    Zhang, Yanlai
    Wu, Jianghao
    PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 2024, 146
  • [34] SELF-PROPULSION AT LOW REYNOLDS-NUMBER
    SHAPERE, A
    WILCZEK, F
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1987, 58 (20) : 2051 - 2054
  • [35] Role of symmetry in driven propulsion at low Reynolds number
    Sachs, Johannes
    Morozov, Konstantin I.
    Kenneth, Oded
    Qiu, Tian
    Segreto, Nico
    Fischer, Peer
    Leshansky, Alexander M.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2018, 98 (06)
  • [36] Intertwined vorticity and elastodynamics in flapping wing propulsion
    Mysa, Ravi C.
    Venkatraman, Kartik
    JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2016, 787 : 175 - 223
  • [37] Numerical Study of Flexible Flapping Wing Propulsion
    Yang, Tao
    Wei, Mingjun
    Zhao, Hong
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2010, 48 (12) : 2909 - 2915
  • [38] OPTIMUM PITCHING AXES IN FLAPPING WING PROPULSION
    YATES, GT
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1986, 120 (03) : 255 - 276
  • [39] Effect of spanwise flexibility on flapping wing propulsion
    Heathcote, S.
    Wang, Z.
    Gursul, I.
    JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2008, 24 (02) : 183 - 199
  • [40] Investigation of the aerodynamic performance and flow physics on cross sections of Dragonfly wing on flapping and pitching motion in low Reynolds number
    Lavimi, Roham
    Hojaji, Mohammad
    Manshadi, Mojtaba Dehghan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART G-JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2019, 233 (02) : 589 - 603