A comparison of analytical methods for the content and purity of cefradine

被引:0
|
作者
Hyun, Myung Ho [3 ,4 ]
Jeong, Euh Duck [1 ,2 ]
Shin, Min Seob [3 ,4 ]
Jin, Jong Sung [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] KBSI, High Technol Components & Mat Res Ctr, Pusan 609735, South Korea
[2] KBSI, Busan Ctr, Pusan 609735, South Korea
[3] Pusan Natl Univ, Dept Chem, Pusan 609735, South Korea
[4] Pusan Natl Univ, Chem Inst Funct Mat, Pusan 609735, South Korea
关键词
cefradine; cefalexin; cefadroxil; impurity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Two HPLC methods such as cefadroxil and cefalexin methods were compared in their performance for the quantitative analysis of the content and purity of beta-lactamic antibiotic, cefradine, for six bulk drug samples. Between the two methods, the cefadroxil method prescribed by the European Pharmacopoeia (EP) for the determination of impurities in cefradoxil was superior to the cefalexin method prescribed by the EP and by the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) for the determination of cefalexin impurity in cefradine in terms of the greater stability of the chromatogram baselines and the higher precision, i.e., the lower % relative standard deviation (RSD). Based on the comparison of the two HPLC methods, the cefadroxil method was recommended to replace the TLC method, which has been prescribed by the EP as the official method for determination of extraneous impurities in cefradine.
引用
收藏
页码:1185 / 1189
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A comparison of analytical test methods in dairy processing
    Burke, Niamh
    Zacharski, Krzysztof
    Adley, Catherine C.
    Southern, Mark
    FOOD CONTROL, 2021, 121
  • [42] Analysis of pure copper – a comparison of analytical methods
    Britta Lange
    Sebastian Recknagel
    Michael Czerwensky
    Ralf Matschat
    Matthias Michaelis
    Burkhard Peplinski
    Ulrich Panne
    Microchimica Acta, 2008, 160 : 97 - 107
  • [43] The Effectivity Comparison of TDOA Analytical Solution Methods
    Van Doan, Sang
    Vesely, Jiri
    2015 16TH INTERNATIONAL RADAR SYMPOSIUM (IRS), 2015, : 800 - 805
  • [44] COMPARISON OF ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR NUMERICAL TAXONOMY OF YEASTS
    JONES, GR
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1975, 89 (JUL): : 175 - 181
  • [45] A comparison of geometrical and analytical methods of astrometric corrections
    Marco, FJ
    Martínez, MJ
    López, JA
    REVISTA MEXICANA DE ASTRONOMIA Y ASTROFISICA, 2001, 37 (01) : 73 - 81
  • [46] A Comparison of Analytical Methods for Genetic Association Studies
    Motsinger-Reif, Alison A.
    Reif, David M.
    Fanelli, Theresa J.
    Ritchie, Marylyn D.
    GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 32 (08) : 767 - 778
  • [47] Pyrrolizidine alkaloids in honey: Comparison of analytical methods
    Universität Würzburg, Lehrstuhl für Lebensmittelchemie, Am Hubland, D-97974 Würzburg, Germany
    不详
    不详
    不详
    不详
    Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Exposure Risk Assess., 3 (332-347):
  • [48] Comparison of Analytical Methods Of Serum Untargeted Metabolomics
    Fonseca, Tiago A. H.
    Conceieao Oliveira, M.
    Araujo, Ruben
    Bento, Luis
    Von Rekowski, Cristiana
    Justino, Goncalo C.
    Calado, Cecilia R. C.
    2023 IEEE 7TH PORTUGUESE MEETING ON BIOENGINEERING, ENBENG, 2023, : 32 - 35
  • [49] Comparison of numerical and analytical methods of analysis of tunnels
    Elarabi, H.
    Mustafa, A.
    GEOTECHNICAL ASPECTS OF UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION IN SOFT GROUND, 2014, : 225 - 231
  • [50] Pyrrolizidine alkaloids in honey: comparison of analytical methods
    Kempf, M.
    Wittig, M.
    Reinhard, A.
    von der Ohe, K.
    Blacquiere, T.
    Raezke, K. -P.
    Michel, R.
    Schreier, P.
    Beuerle, T.
    FOOD ADDITIVES AND CONTAMINANTS PART A-CHEMISTRY ANALYSIS CONTROL EXPOSURE & RISK ASSESSMENT, 2011, 28 (03): : 332 - 347