A cognitive and neural network approach for software defect prediction

Software defect prediction is used to assist developers in finding potential defects and allocating their testing efforts as the scale of software grows. Traditional software defect prediction methods primarily concentrate on creating static code metrics that are fed into machine learning classifiers to predict defects in the code. To achieve the desired classifier performance, appropriate design decisions are required for deep neural network (DNN) and convolutional neural network (CNN) models. This is especially important when predicting software module fault proneness. When correctly identified, this could help to reduce testing costs by concentrating efforts on the modules that have been identified as fault prone. This paper proposes a CONVSDP and DNNSDP (cognitive and neural network) approach for predicting software defects. Python Programming Language with Keras and TensorFlow was used as the framework. From three NASA system datasets (CM1, KC3, and PC1) selected from PROMISE repository, a comparative analysis with machine learning algorithms (such as Random Forest (RF), Decision Trees (DT), Nave Bayes (NF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) in terms of F-Measure (known as F1-score), Recall, Precision, Accuracy, Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) and Area Under Curve (AUC) has been presented. We extract four dataset attributes from the original datasets and use them to estimate the development effort, development time, and number of errors. The number of operands, operators, branch count, and executable LOCs are among these attributes. Furthermore, a new parameter called cognitive weight (Wc) of Basic Control Structure (BCS) is proposed to make the proposed cognitive technique more effective, and a cognitive data set of 8 features for NASA system datasets (CM1, KC3, and PC1) selected from the PROMISE repository to predict software defects is created. The experimental results showed that the CONVSDP and DNNSDP models was comparable to existing classifiers in both original datasets and cognitive data sets, and that it outperformed them in most of the experiments.