Comparative analysis of feature extraction methods in satellite imagery

被引:12
|
作者
Karim, Shahid [1 ]
Zhang, Ye [1 ]
Asif, Muhammad Rizwan [2 ]
Ali, Saad [3 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Elect & Informat Engn, Harbin, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Elect & Informat Engn, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Mechatron Engn, Harbin, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
feature extraction; satellite imagery; remote sensing; shadow regions; feature matching;
D O I
10.1117/1.JRS.11.042618
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Feature extraction techniques are extensively being used in satellite imagery and getting impressive attention for remote sensing applications. The state-of-the-art feature extraction methods are appropriate according to the categories and structures of the objects to be detected. Based on distinctive computations of each feature extraction method, different types of images are selected to evaluate the performance of the methods, such as binary robust invariant scalable keypoints (BRISK), scale-invariant feature transform, speeded-up robust features (SURF), features from accelerated segment test (FAST), histogram of oriented gradients, and local binary patterns. Total computational time is calculated to evaluate the speed of each feature extraction method. The extracted features are counted under shadow regions and preprocessed shadow regions to compare the functioning of each method. We have studied the combination of SURF with FAST and BRISK individually and found very promising results with an increased number of features and less computational time. Finally, feature matching is conferred for all methods. (C) 2017 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparative study of feature selection and feature extraction methods for financial distress identification
    Kuiziniene, Dovile
    Savickas, Paulius
    Kunickaite, Rimante
    Juozaitiene, Ruta
    Damasevicius, Robertas
    Maskeliunas, Rytis
    Krilavicius, Tomas
    PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2024, 10
  • [32] A comparative study of feature selection and feature extraction methods for financial distress identification
    Kuizinienė D.
    Savickas P.
    Kunickaitė R.
    Juozaitienė R.
    Damaševičius R.
    Maskeliūnas R.
    Krilavičius T.
    PeerJ Computer Science, 2024, 10
  • [33] Collaborative representation analysis methods for feature extraction
    Hua, Juliang
    Wang, Huan
    Ren, Mingu
    Huang, Heyan
    NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2017, 28 : S225 - S231
  • [34] Comparative Analysis of Feature Extraction Methods in the Clustering of Electronic Nose Response Correlated with GC/MS Analysis
    Hardoyono, Fajar
    Iswanto, Bambang Heru
    Triyana, Kuwat
    ADVANCES OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR SOCIETY, 2016, 1755
  • [35] Collaborative representation analysis methods for feature extraction
    Juliang Hua
    Huan Wang
    Mingu Ren
    Heyan Huang
    Neural Computing and Applications, 2017, 28 : 225 - 231
  • [36] FEATURE-EXTRACTION METHODS FOR EEG ANALYSIS
    JANSEN, BH
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1985, 61 (03): : S222 - S222
  • [37] Comparative studies of feature extraction methods with application face recognition
    Jiang, Yunfei
    Guo, Ping
    2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-8, 2007, : 796 - 801
  • [38] Comparative evaluation of feature extraction methods for human motion detection
    Multidimensional Data Analysis and Knowledge Management Laboratory, Dept. of Computer Engineering and Informatics, University of Patras, Rion-Patras
    26500, Greece
    IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, (146-154):
  • [39] A Comparative Study of EMD and LMD Methods in Fault Feature Extraction
    Shao, Renping
    Wang, Yayun
    Qi, Xiankun
    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SIGNAL PROCESSING BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, AND INFORMATICS (SPBEI 2013), 2014, : 1119 - 1130
  • [40] Level set based shape model for automatic linear feature extraction from satellite imagery
    2013, International Frequency Sensor Association, 46 Thorny Vineway, Toronto, ON M2J 4J2, Canada (159):